All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
	vineetg@rivosinc.com, heiko@sntech.de, slewis@rivosinc.com,
	Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests: Test the new RISC-V hwprobe interface
Date: Mon,  6 Feb 2023 12:14:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230206201455.1790329-7-evan@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230206201455.1790329-1-evan@rivosinc.com>

This adds a test for the recently added RISC-V interface for probing
hardware capabilities.  It happens to be the first selftest we have for
RISC-V, so I've added some infrastructure for those as well.  The build
stuff looks pretty straight-forward, but there's also  a tiny C library
to avoid coupling this to any userspace implementation.

Co-developed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>

---

Changes in v2:
 - Updated the selftests to the new API and added some more.
 - Fixed indentation, comments in .S, and general checkpatch complaints.


---
 tools/testing/selftests/Makefile              |  1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile        | 58 ++++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile  | 10 +++
 .../testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S     | 12 +++
 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/libc.S          | 46 ++++++++++
 6 files changed, 216 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/libc.S

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
index 41b649452560..a599ef726310 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ TARGETS += pstore
 TARGETS += ptrace
 TARGETS += openat2
 TARGETS += resctrl
+TARGETS += riscv
 TARGETS += rlimits
 TARGETS += rseq
 TARGETS += rtc
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..32a72902d045
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Originally tools/testing/arm64/Makefile
+
+# When ARCH not overridden for crosscompiling, lookup machine
+ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not)
+
+ifneq (,$(filter $(ARCH),riscv))
+RISCV_SUBTARGETS ?= hwprobe
+else
+RISCV_SUBTARGETS :=
+endif
+
+CFLAGS := -Wall -O2 -g
+
+# A proper top_srcdir is needed by KSFT(lib.mk)
+top_srcdir = $(realpath ../../../../)
+
+# Additional include paths needed by kselftest.h and local headers
+CFLAGS += -I$(top_srcdir)/tools/testing/selftests/
+
+CFLAGS += $(KHDR_INCLUDES)
+
+export CFLAGS
+export top_srcdir
+
+all:
+	@for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do				\
+		BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR;			\
+		mkdir -p $$BUILD_TARGET;			\
+		$(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;		\
+	done
+
+install: all
+	@for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do				\
+		BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR;			\
+		$(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;		\
+	done
+
+run_tests: all
+	@for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do				\
+		BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR;			\
+		$(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;		\
+	done
+
+# Avoid any output on non riscv on emit_tests
+emit_tests: all
+	@for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do				\
+		BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR;			\
+		$(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;		\
+	done
+
+clean:
+	@for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do				\
+		BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR;			\
+		$(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;		\
+	done
+
+.PHONY: all clean install run_tests emit_tests
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..614501584803
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited
+# Originally tools/testing/arm64/abi/Makefile
+
+TEST_GEN_PROGS := hwprobe
+
+include ../../lib.mk
+
+$(OUTPUT)/hwprobe: hwprobe.c ../libc.S sys_hwprobe.S
+	$(CC) -o$@ $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -nostdlib $^
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ddfb61de2938
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#include <asm/hwprobe.h>
+
+/*
+ * Rather than relying on having a new enough libc to define this, just do it
+ * ourselves.  This way we don't need to be coupled to a new-enough libc to
+ * contain the call.
+ */
+long riscv_hwprobe(struct riscv_hwprobe *pairs, long pair_count,
+		   long cpu_count, unsigned long *cpus, unsigned long flags);
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+	struct riscv_hwprobe pairs[8];
+	unsigned long cpus;
+	long out;
+
+	/* Fake the CPU_SET ops. */
+	cpus = -1;
+
+	/*
+	 * Just run a basic test: pass enough pairs to get up to the base
+	 * behavior, and then check to make sure it's sane.
+	 */
+	for (long i = 0; i < 8; i++)
+		pairs[i].key = i;
+	out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 1, &cpus, 0);
+	if (out != 0)
+		return -1;
+	for (long i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
+		/* Fail if the kernel claims not to recognize a base key. */
+		if ((i < 4) && (pairs[i].key != i))
+			return -2;
+
+		if (pairs[i].key != RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR)
+			continue;
+
+		if (pairs[i].value & RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA)
+			continue;
+
+		return -3;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * This should also work with a NULL CPU set, but should not work
+	 * with an improperly supplied CPU set.
+	 */
+	out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 0, 0, 0);
+	if (out != 0)
+		return -4;
+
+	out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 0, &cpus, 0);
+	if (out == 0)
+		return -5;
+
+	out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 1, 0, 0);
+	if (out == 0)
+		return -6;
+
+	/*
+	 * Check that keys work by providing one that we know exists, and
+	 * checking to make sure the resultig pair is what we asked for.
+	 */
+	pairs[0].key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR;
+	out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 1, 1, &cpus, 0);
+	if (out != 0)
+		return -7;
+	if (pairs[0].key != RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR)
+		return -8;
+
+	/*
+	 * Check that an unknown key gets overwritten with -1,
+	 * but doesn't block elements after it.
+	 */
+	pairs[0].key = 0x5555;
+	pairs[1].key = 1;
+	pairs[1].value = 0xAAAA;
+	out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 2, 0, 0, 0);
+	if (out != 0)
+		return -9;
+
+	if (pairs[0].key != -1)
+		return -10;
+
+	if ((pairs[1].key != 1) || (pairs[1].value == 0xAAAA))
+		return -11;
+
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ed8d28863b27
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (C) 2022 Rivos, Inc */
+
+.text
+.global riscv_hwprobe
+riscv_hwprobe:
+	# Put __NR_riscv_hwprobe in the syscall number register, then just shim
+	# back the kernel's return.  This doesn't do any sort of errno
+	# handling, the caller can deal with it.
+	li a7, 258
+	ecall
+	ret
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/libc.S b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/libc.S
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1041bbea9b6b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/libc.S
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (C) 2022 Rivos, Inc */
+/* A C library */
+
+#if __riscv_xlen == 64
+# define REG_S sd
+#else
+# define REG_S sw
+#endif
+
+.text
+.global _start
+_start:
+.option push
+.option norelax
+	la gp, __global_pointer$
+.option pop
+
+	la sp, stack
+
+	la t0, heap
+	la t1, brk
+	REG_S t0, 0(t1)
+
+	li a0, 0
+	li a1, 0
+
+	call main
+
+	li a7, 93
+	ecall
+
+1:
+	j 1b
+
+.data
+brk:
+	.long 0
+
+.global heap
+heap:
+.rep 65536
+.byte 0
+.endr
+.global stack
+stack:
-- 
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
	vineetg@rivosinc.com, heiko@sntech.de, slewis@rivosinc.com,
	Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests: Test the new RISC-V hwprobe interface
Date: Mon,  6 Feb 2023 12:14:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230206201455.1790329-7-evan@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230206201455.1790329-1-evan@rivosinc.com>

This adds a test for the recently added RISC-V interface for probing
hardware capabilities.  It happens to be the first selftest we have for
RISC-V, so I've added some infrastructure for those as well.  The build
stuff looks pretty straight-forward, but there's also  a tiny C library
to avoid coupling this to any userspace implementation.

Co-developed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>

---

Changes in v2:
 - Updated the selftests to the new API and added some more.
 - Fixed indentation, comments in .S, and general checkpatch complaints.


---
 tools/testing/selftests/Makefile              |  1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile        | 58 ++++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile  | 10 +++
 .../testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S     | 12 +++
 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/libc.S          | 46 ++++++++++
 6 files changed, 216 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/libc.S

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
index 41b649452560..a599ef726310 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ TARGETS += pstore
 TARGETS += ptrace
 TARGETS += openat2
 TARGETS += resctrl
+TARGETS += riscv
 TARGETS += rlimits
 TARGETS += rseq
 TARGETS += rtc
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..32a72902d045
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Originally tools/testing/arm64/Makefile
+
+# When ARCH not overridden for crosscompiling, lookup machine
+ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not)
+
+ifneq (,$(filter $(ARCH),riscv))
+RISCV_SUBTARGETS ?= hwprobe
+else
+RISCV_SUBTARGETS :=
+endif
+
+CFLAGS := -Wall -O2 -g
+
+# A proper top_srcdir is needed by KSFT(lib.mk)
+top_srcdir = $(realpath ../../../../)
+
+# Additional include paths needed by kselftest.h and local headers
+CFLAGS += -I$(top_srcdir)/tools/testing/selftests/
+
+CFLAGS += $(KHDR_INCLUDES)
+
+export CFLAGS
+export top_srcdir
+
+all:
+	@for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do				\
+		BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR;			\
+		mkdir -p $$BUILD_TARGET;			\
+		$(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;		\
+	done
+
+install: all
+	@for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do				\
+		BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR;			\
+		$(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;		\
+	done
+
+run_tests: all
+	@for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do				\
+		BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR;			\
+		$(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;		\
+	done
+
+# Avoid any output on non riscv on emit_tests
+emit_tests: all
+	@for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do				\
+		BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR;			\
+		$(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;		\
+	done
+
+clean:
+	@for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do				\
+		BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR;			\
+		$(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@;		\
+	done
+
+.PHONY: all clean install run_tests emit_tests
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..614501584803
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited
+# Originally tools/testing/arm64/abi/Makefile
+
+TEST_GEN_PROGS := hwprobe
+
+include ../../lib.mk
+
+$(OUTPUT)/hwprobe: hwprobe.c ../libc.S sys_hwprobe.S
+	$(CC) -o$@ $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -nostdlib $^
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ddfb61de2938
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#include <asm/hwprobe.h>
+
+/*
+ * Rather than relying on having a new enough libc to define this, just do it
+ * ourselves.  This way we don't need to be coupled to a new-enough libc to
+ * contain the call.
+ */
+long riscv_hwprobe(struct riscv_hwprobe *pairs, long pair_count,
+		   long cpu_count, unsigned long *cpus, unsigned long flags);
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+	struct riscv_hwprobe pairs[8];
+	unsigned long cpus;
+	long out;
+
+	/* Fake the CPU_SET ops. */
+	cpus = -1;
+
+	/*
+	 * Just run a basic test: pass enough pairs to get up to the base
+	 * behavior, and then check to make sure it's sane.
+	 */
+	for (long i = 0; i < 8; i++)
+		pairs[i].key = i;
+	out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 1, &cpus, 0);
+	if (out != 0)
+		return -1;
+	for (long i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
+		/* Fail if the kernel claims not to recognize a base key. */
+		if ((i < 4) && (pairs[i].key != i))
+			return -2;
+
+		if (pairs[i].key != RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR)
+			continue;
+
+		if (pairs[i].value & RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA)
+			continue;
+
+		return -3;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * This should also work with a NULL CPU set, but should not work
+	 * with an improperly supplied CPU set.
+	 */
+	out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 0, 0, 0);
+	if (out != 0)
+		return -4;
+
+	out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 0, &cpus, 0);
+	if (out == 0)
+		return -5;
+
+	out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 1, 0, 0);
+	if (out == 0)
+		return -6;
+
+	/*
+	 * Check that keys work by providing one that we know exists, and
+	 * checking to make sure the resultig pair is what we asked for.
+	 */
+	pairs[0].key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR;
+	out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 1, 1, &cpus, 0);
+	if (out != 0)
+		return -7;
+	if (pairs[0].key != RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR)
+		return -8;
+
+	/*
+	 * Check that an unknown key gets overwritten with -1,
+	 * but doesn't block elements after it.
+	 */
+	pairs[0].key = 0x5555;
+	pairs[1].key = 1;
+	pairs[1].value = 0xAAAA;
+	out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 2, 0, 0, 0);
+	if (out != 0)
+		return -9;
+
+	if (pairs[0].key != -1)
+		return -10;
+
+	if ((pairs[1].key != 1) || (pairs[1].value == 0xAAAA))
+		return -11;
+
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ed8d28863b27
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (C) 2022 Rivos, Inc */
+
+.text
+.global riscv_hwprobe
+riscv_hwprobe:
+	# Put __NR_riscv_hwprobe in the syscall number register, then just shim
+	# back the kernel's return.  This doesn't do any sort of errno
+	# handling, the caller can deal with it.
+	li a7, 258
+	ecall
+	ret
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/libc.S b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/libc.S
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1041bbea9b6b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/libc.S
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (C) 2022 Rivos, Inc */
+/* A C library */
+
+#if __riscv_xlen == 64
+# define REG_S sd
+#else
+# define REG_S sw
+#endif
+
+.text
+.global _start
+_start:
+.option push
+.option norelax
+	la gp, __global_pointer$
+.option pop
+
+	la sp, stack
+
+	la t0, heap
+	la t1, brk
+	REG_S t0, 0(t1)
+
+	li a0, 0
+	li a1, 0
+
+	call main
+
+	li a7, 93
+	ecall
+
+1:
+	j 1b
+
+.data
+brk:
+	.long 0
+
+.global heap
+heap:
+.rep 65536
+.byte 0
+.endr
+.global stack
+stack:
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-06 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-06 20:14 [PATCH v2 0/6] RISC-V Hardware Probing User Interface Evan Green
2023-02-06 20:14 ` Evan Green
2023-02-06 20:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] RISC-V: Move struct riscv_cpuinfo to new header Evan Green
2023-02-06 20:14   ` Evan Green
2023-02-14 21:38   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-14 21:38     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-14 21:57     ` Evan Green
2023-02-14 21:57       ` Evan Green
2023-02-06 20:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] RISC-V: Add a syscall for HW probing Evan Green
2023-02-06 20:14   ` Evan Green
2023-02-07  6:13   ` Greg KH
2023-02-07  6:13     ` Greg KH
2023-02-07  6:32     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-07  6:32       ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-09 17:09       ` Evan Green
2023-02-09 17:09         ` Evan Green
2023-02-09 17:13         ` Greg KH
2023-02-09 17:13           ` Greg KH
2023-02-09 17:22           ` Jessica Clarke
2023-02-09 17:22             ` Jessica Clarke
2023-02-10  6:48             ` Greg KH
2023-02-10  6:48               ` Greg KH
2023-02-09 18:41           ` Evan Green
2023-02-09 18:41             ` Evan Green
2023-02-10  6:50             ` Greg KH
2023-02-10  6:50               ` Greg KH
2023-02-07 23:16   ` kernel test robot
2023-02-07 23:16     ` kernel test robot
2023-02-14 23:51   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-14 23:51     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-15  8:04     ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-15  8:04       ` Andrew Jones
2023-02-15 20:49     ` Evan Green
2023-02-15 20:49       ` Evan Green
2023-02-15 21:10       ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-15 21:10         ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-15  9:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-15  9:56     ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-15 21:14     ` Evan Green
2023-02-15 21:14       ` Evan Green
2023-02-15 22:43       ` Jessica Clarke
2023-02-15 22:43         ` Jessica Clarke
2023-02-16 13:28         ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-16 13:28           ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-16 23:18           ` Evan Green
2023-02-16 23:18             ` Evan Green
2023-02-06 20:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] RISC-V: hwprobe: Add support for RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA Evan Green
2023-02-06 20:14   ` Evan Green
2023-02-08  5:06   ` kernel test robot
2023-02-15 21:25   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-15 21:25     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-15 22:09   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-15 22:09     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-06 20:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] dt-bindings: Add RISC-V misaligned access performance Evan Green
2023-02-06 20:14   ` Evan Green
2023-02-06 21:49   ` Rob Herring
2023-02-06 21:49     ` Rob Herring
2023-02-07 17:05   ` Rob Herring
2023-02-07 17:05     ` Rob Herring
2023-02-08 12:45     ` David Laight
2023-02-08 12:45       ` David Laight
2023-02-09 16:51       ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-09 16:51         ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-28 14:56         ` Rob Herring
2023-02-28 14:56           ` Rob Herring
2023-02-14 21:26   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-14 21:26     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-15 20:50     ` Evan Green
2023-02-15 20:50       ` Evan Green
2023-02-06 20:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] RISC-V: hwprobe: Support probing of " Evan Green
2023-02-06 20:14   ` Evan Green
2023-02-07  7:02   ` kernel test robot
2023-02-07  7:02     ` kernel test robot
2023-02-15 21:57   ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-15 21:57     ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-18  0:15     ` Evan Green
2023-02-18  0:15       ` Evan Green
2023-02-06 20:14 ` Evan Green [this message]
2023-02-06 20:14   ` [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests: Test the new RISC-V hwprobe interface Evan Green
2023-02-06 21:27   ` Mark Brown
2023-02-06 21:27     ` Mark Brown
2023-02-09 18:44     ` Evan Green
2023-02-09 18:44       ` Evan Green
2023-02-06 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] RISC-V Hardware Probing User Interface Jessica Clarke
2023-02-06 21:11   ` Jessica Clarke
2023-02-06 22:47   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2023-02-06 22:47     ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2023-02-09 16:56     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-09 16:56       ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-06 22:32 ` Conor Dooley
2023-02-06 22:32   ` Conor Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230206201455.1790329-7-evan@rivosinc.com \
    --to=evan@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=slewis@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=vineetg@rivosinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.