All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yue Zhao <findns94@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: roman.gushchin@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
	shakeelb@google.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, willy@infradead.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tangyeechou@gmail.com,
	Yue Zhao <findns94@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2, 3/4] mm, memcg: Prevent memory.oom_control load/store tearing
Date: Mon,  6 Mar 2023 23:41:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230306154138.3775-4-findns94@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230306154138.3775-1-findns94@gmail.com>

The knob for cgroup v1 memory controller: memory.oom_control
is not protected by any locking so it can be modified while it is used.
This is not an actual problem because races are unlikely.
But it is better to use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE to prevent compiler from
doing anything funky.

The access of memcg->oom_kill_disable is lockless,
so it can be concurrently set at the same time as we are
trying to read it.

Signed-off-by: Yue Zhao <findns94@gmail.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index dca895c66a9b..26605b2f51b1 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -4515,7 +4515,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_oom_control_read(struct seq_file *sf, void *v)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_seq(sf);
 
-	seq_printf(sf, "oom_kill_disable %d\n", memcg->oom_kill_disable);
+	seq_printf(sf, "oom_kill_disable %d\n", READ_ONCE(memcg->oom_kill_disable));
 	seq_printf(sf, "under_oom %d\n", (bool)memcg->under_oom);
 	seq_printf(sf, "oom_kill %lu\n",
 		   atomic_long_read(&memcg->memory_events[MEMCG_OOM_KILL]));
@@ -4531,7 +4531,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_oom_control_write(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
 	if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg) || !((val == 0) || (val == 1)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	memcg->oom_kill_disable = val;
+	WRITE_ONCE(memcg->oom_kill_disable, val);
 	if (!val)
 		memcg_oom_recover(memcg);
 
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yue Zhao <findns94-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
Cc: roman.gushchin-fxUVXftIFDnyG1zEObXtfA@public.gmane.org,
	hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
	mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	muchun.song-fxUVXftIFDnyG1zEObXtfA@public.gmane.org,
	willy-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	tangyeechou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	Yue Zhao <findns94-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2, 3/4] mm, memcg: Prevent memory.oom_control load/store tearing
Date: Mon,  6 Mar 2023 23:41:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230306154138.3775-4-findns94@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230306154138.3775-1-findns94-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

The knob for cgroup v1 memory controller: memory.oom_control
is not protected by any locking so it can be modified while it is used.
This is not an actual problem because races are unlikely.
But it is better to use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE to prevent compiler from
doing anything funky.

The access of memcg->oom_kill_disable is lockless,
so it can be concurrently set at the same time as we are
trying to read it.

Signed-off-by: Yue Zhao <findns94-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index dca895c66a9b..26605b2f51b1 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -4515,7 +4515,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_oom_control_read(struct seq_file *sf, void *v)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_seq(sf);
 
-	seq_printf(sf, "oom_kill_disable %d\n", memcg->oom_kill_disable);
+	seq_printf(sf, "oom_kill_disable %d\n", READ_ONCE(memcg->oom_kill_disable));
 	seq_printf(sf, "under_oom %d\n", (bool)memcg->under_oom);
 	seq_printf(sf, "oom_kill %lu\n",
 		   atomic_long_read(&memcg->memory_events[MEMCG_OOM_KILL]));
@@ -4531,7 +4531,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_oom_control_write(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
 	if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg) || !((val == 0) || (val == 1)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	memcg->oom_kill_disable = val;
+	WRITE_ONCE(memcg->oom_kill_disable, val);
 	if (!val)
 		memcg_oom_recover(memcg);
 
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-06 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-06 15:41 [PATCH v2, 0/4] mm, memcg: cgroup v1 and v2 tunable load/store tearing fixes Yue Zhao
2023-03-06 15:41 ` Yue Zhao
2023-03-06 15:41 ` [PATCH v2, 1/4] mm, memcg: Prevent memory.oom.group load/store tearing Yue Zhao
2023-03-06 15:41   ` Yue Zhao
2023-03-06 17:47   ` Michal Hocko
2023-03-06 17:47     ` Michal Hocko
2023-03-06 15:41 ` [PATCH v2, 2/4] mm, memcg: Prevent memory.swappiness " Yue Zhao
2023-03-06 17:50   ` Michal Hocko
2023-03-06 17:50     ` Michal Hocko
2023-03-06 15:41 ` Yue Zhao [this message]
2023-03-06 15:41   ` [PATCH v2, 3/4] mm, memcg: Prevent memory.oom_control " Yue Zhao
2023-03-06 17:53   ` Michal Hocko
2023-03-06 17:53     ` Michal Hocko
2023-03-08 14:51     ` Martin Zhao
2023-03-08 14:51       ` Martin Zhao
2023-03-06 15:41 ` [PATCH v2, 4/4] mm, memcg: Prevent memory.soft_limit_in_bytes " Yue Zhao
2023-03-06 15:41   ` Yue Zhao
2023-03-06 17:55   ` Michal Hocko
2023-03-06 17:55     ` Michal Hocko
2023-03-06 16:25 ` [PATCH v2, 0/4] mm, memcg: cgroup v1 and v2 tunable load/store tearing fixes Shakeel Butt
2023-03-06 16:25   ` Shakeel Butt
2023-03-06 17:51 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-03-06 17:51   ` Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230306154138.3775-4-findns94@gmail.com \
    --to=findns94@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=tangyeechou@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.