All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "John Harrison" <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>,
	"Daniele Ceraolo Spurio" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14.y] drm/i915: Don't use stolen memory for ring buffers with LLC
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 17:05:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230318000531.480966-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <167820540147158@kroah.com>

From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>

Direction from hardware is that stolen memory should never be used for
ring buffer allocations on platforms with LLC. There are too many
caching pitfalls due to the way stolen memory accesses are routed. So
it is safest to just not use it.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Fixes: c58b735fc762 ("drm/i915: Allocate rings from stolen")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Tested-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230216011101.1909009-2-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
(cherry picked from commit f54c1f6c697c4297f7ed94283c184acc338a5cf8)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 690e0ec8e63da9a29b39fedc6ed5da09c7c82651)
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 6c7563c1ab5f..f0b923e037df 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -1359,10 +1359,11 @@ static struct i915_vma *
 intel_ring_create_vma(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int size)
 {
 	struct i915_address_space *vm = &dev_priv->ggtt.base;
-	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = NULL;
 	struct i915_vma *vma;
 
-	obj = i915_gem_object_create_stolen(dev_priv, size);
+	if (!HAS_LLC(dev_priv))
+		obj = i915_gem_object_create_stolen(dev_priv, size);
 	if (!obj)
 		obj = i915_gem_object_create_internal(dev_priv, size);
 	if (IS_ERR(obj))
-- 
2.39.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4.14.y] drm/i915: Don't use stolen memory for ring buffers with LLC
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 17:05:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230318000531.480966-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <167820540147158@kroah.com>

From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>

Direction from hardware is that stolen memory should never be used for
ring buffer allocations on platforms with LLC. There are too many
caching pitfalls due to the way stolen memory accesses are routed. So
it is safest to just not use it.

Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Fixes: c58b735fc762 ("drm/i915: Allocate rings from stolen")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Tested-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230216011101.1909009-2-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
(cherry picked from commit f54c1f6c697c4297f7ed94283c184acc338a5cf8)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 690e0ec8e63da9a29b39fedc6ed5da09c7c82651)
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 6c7563c1ab5f..f0b923e037df 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -1359,10 +1359,11 @@ static struct i915_vma *
 intel_ring_create_vma(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int size)
 {
 	struct i915_address_space *vm = &dev_priv->ggtt.base;
-	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = NULL;
 	struct i915_vma *vma;
 
-	obj = i915_gem_object_create_stolen(dev_priv, size);
+	if (!HAS_LLC(dev_priv))
+		obj = i915_gem_object_create_stolen(dev_priv, size);
 	if (!obj)
 		obj = i915_gem_object_create_internal(dev_priv, size);
 	if (IS_ERR(obj))
-- 
2.39.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-18  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-07 16:10 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915: Don't use stolen memory for ring buffers with LLC" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2023-03-18  0:05 ` John.C.Harrison [this message]
2023-03-18  0:05   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4.14.y] drm/i915: Don't use stolen memory for ring buffers with LLC John.C.Harrison

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230318000531.480966-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
    --to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.