[PATCH LSM 2/2] selinux: Implement mptcp_add_subflow hook

From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	 "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	 Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>,
	 Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>,
	 mptcp@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,  linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org,
	 Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Subject: [PATCH LSM 2/2] selinux: Implement mptcp_add_subflow hook
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 19:44:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230419-upstream-lsm-next-20230419-mptcp-sublows-user-ctx-v1-2-9d4064cb0075@tessares.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230419-upstream-lsm-next-20230419-mptcp-sublows-user-ctx-v1-0-9d4064cb0075@tessares.net>

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

Newly added subflows should inherit the LSM label from the associated
msk socket regarless current context.

This patch implements the above copying sid and class from the msk
context, deleting the existing subflow label, if any, and then
re-creating a new one.

The new helper reuses the selinux_netlbl_sk_security_free() function,
and the latter can end-up being called multiple times with the same
argument; we additionally need to make it idempotent.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
---
 security/selinux/hooks.c    | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 security/selinux/netlabel.c |  8 ++++++--
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 9a5bdfc21314..53cfc1cb67d2 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -5476,6 +5476,21 @@ static void selinux_sctp_sk_clone(struct sctp_association *asoc, struct sock *sk
 	selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(sk, newsk);
 }
 
+static int selinux_mptcp_add_subflow(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
+{
+	struct sk_security_struct *ssksec = ssk->sk_security;
+	struct sk_security_struct *sksec = sk->sk_security;
+
+	ssksec->sclass = sksec->sclass;
+	ssksec->sid = sksec->sid;
+
+	/* replace the existing subflow label deleting the existing one
+	 * and re-recrating a new label using the current context
+	 */
+	selinux_netlbl_sk_security_free(ssksec);
+	return selinux_netlbl_socket_post_create(ssk, ssk->sk_family);
+}
+
 static int selinux_inet_conn_request(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 				     struct request_sock *req)
 {
@@ -7216,6 +7231,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list selinux_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(sctp_sk_clone, selinux_sctp_sk_clone),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(sctp_bind_connect, selinux_sctp_bind_connect),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(sctp_assoc_established, selinux_sctp_assoc_established),
+	LSM_HOOK_INIT(mptcp_add_subflow, selinux_mptcp_add_subflow),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inet_conn_request, selinux_inet_conn_request),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inet_csk_clone, selinux_inet_csk_clone),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inet_conn_established, selinux_inet_conn_established),
diff --git a/security/selinux/netlabel.c b/security/selinux/netlabel.c
index 1321f15799e2..33187e38def7 100644
--- a/security/selinux/netlabel.c
+++ b/security/selinux/netlabel.c
@@ -155,8 +155,12 @@ void selinux_netlbl_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u16 family, int error, int gateway)
  */
 void selinux_netlbl_sk_security_free(struct sk_security_struct *sksec)
 {
-	if (sksec->nlbl_secattr != NULL)
-		netlbl_secattr_free(sksec->nlbl_secattr);
+	if (!sksec->nlbl_secattr)
+		return;
+
+	netlbl_secattr_free(sksec->nlbl_secattr);
+	sksec->nlbl_secattr = NULL;
+	sksec->nlbl_state = NLBL_UNSET;
 }
 
 /**

-- 
2.39.2

