From: "Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Lars Ellenberg" <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
"Philipp Reisner" <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
"Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, "Thomas Voegtle" <tv@lio96.de>
Subject: [PATCH] drbd: correctly submit flush bio on barrier
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 14:19:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230503121937.17232-1-christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> (raw)
When we receive a flush command (or "barrier" in DRBD), we currently use
a REQ_OP_FLUSH with the REQ_PREFLUSH flag set.
The correct way to submit a flush bio is by using a REQ_OP_WRITE without
any data, and set the REQ_PREFLUSH flag.
Since commit b4a6bb3a67aa ("block: add a sanity check for non-write
flush/fua bios"), this triggers a warning in the block layer, but this
has been broken for quite some time before that.
So use the correct set of flags to actually make the flush happen.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: f9ff0da56437 ("drbd: allow parallel flushes for multi-volume resources")
Reported-by: Thomas Voegtle <tv@lio96.de>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>
---
Previous, incorrect version of this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230502092922.175857-1-christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com/
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
index e54404c632e7..34b112752ab1 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
@@ -1283,7 +1283,7 @@ static void one_flush_endio(struct bio *bio)
static void submit_one_flush(struct drbd_device *device, struct issue_flush_context *ctx)
{
struct bio *bio = bio_alloc(device->ldev->backing_bdev, 0,
- REQ_OP_FLUSH | REQ_PREFLUSH, GFP_NOIO);
+ REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_PREFLUSH, GFP_NOIO);
struct one_flush_context *octx = kmalloc(sizeof(*octx), GFP_NOIO);
if (!octx) {
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-05-03 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-03 12:19 Christoph Böhmwalder [this message]
2023-05-03 15:19 ` [PATCH] drbd: correctly submit flush bio on barrier Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-03 15:39 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230503121937.17232-1-christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
--to=christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tv@lio96.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.