All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	ricardo.neri@intel.com, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@chromium.org>,
	Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
	Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, davem@davemloft.net,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 14/17] watchdog/perf: Add a weak function for an arch to detect if perf can use NMIs
Date: Thu,  4 May 2023 15:13:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230504151100.v4.14.Ic55cb6f90ef5967d8aaa2b503a4e67c753f64d3a@changeid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230504221349.1535669-1-dianders@chromium.org>

On arm64, NMI support needs to be detected at runtime. Add a weak
function to the perf hardlockup detector so that an architecture can
implement it to detect whether NMIs are available.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
While I won't object to this patch landing, I consider it part of the
arm64 perf hardlockup effort. I would be OK with the earlier patches
in the series landing and then not landing ${SUBJECT} patch nor
anything else later.

I'll also note that, as an alternative to this, it would be nice if we
could figure out how to make perf_event_create_kernel_counter() fail
on arm64 if NMIs aren't available. Maybe we could add a "must_use_nmi"
element to "struct perf_event_attr"?

Changes in v4:
- ("Add a weak function for an arch to detect ...") new for v4.

 include/linux/nmi.h    |  1 +
 kernel/watchdog_perf.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/nmi.h b/include/linux/nmi.h
index 90aa33317b4c..9caea5ba494d 100644
--- a/include/linux/nmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/nmi.h
@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ static inline bool trigger_single_cpu_backtrace(int cpu)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF
 u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(int watchdog_thresh);
+bool arch_perf_nmi_is_available(void);
 #endif
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_CHECK_TIMESTAMP) && \
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c b/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
index a55a6eab1b3a..0d1c292a655d 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
@@ -234,12 +234,22 @@ void __init hardlockup_detector_perf_restart(void)
 	}
 }
 
+bool __weak __init arch_perf_nmi_is_available(void)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * watchdog_hardlockup_probe - Probe whether NMI event is available at all
  */
 int __init watchdog_hardlockup_probe(void)
 {
-	int ret = hardlockup_detector_event_create();
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!arch_perf_nmi_is_available())
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	ret = hardlockup_detector_event_create();
 
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_info("Perf NMI watchdog permanently disabled\n");
-- 
2.40.1.521.gf1e218fcd8-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, ricardo.neri@intel.com,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
	ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@chromium.org>,
	npiggin@gmail.com, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
	ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com, Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [PATCH v4 14/17] watchdog/perf: Add a weak function for an arch to detect if perf can use NMIs
Date: Thu,  4 May 2023 15:13:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230504151100.v4.14.Ic55cb6f90ef5967d8aaa2b503a4e67c753f64d3a@changeid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230504221349.1535669-1-dianders@chromium.org>

On arm64, NMI support needs to be detected at runtime. Add a weak
function to the perf hardlockup detector so that an architecture can
implement it to detect whether NMIs are available.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
While I won't object to this patch landing, I consider it part of the
arm64 perf hardlockup effort. I would be OK with the earlier patches
in the series landing and then not landing ${SUBJECT} patch nor
anything else later.

I'll also note that, as an alternative to this, it would be nice if we
could figure out how to make perf_event_create_kernel_counter() fail
on arm64 if NMIs aren't available. Maybe we could add a "must_use_nmi"
element to "struct perf_event_attr"?

Changes in v4:
- ("Add a weak function for an arch to detect ...") new for v4.

 include/linux/nmi.h    |  1 +
 kernel/watchdog_perf.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/nmi.h b/include/linux/nmi.h
index 90aa33317b4c..9caea5ba494d 100644
--- a/include/linux/nmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/nmi.h
@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ static inline bool trigger_single_cpu_backtrace(int cpu)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF
 u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(int watchdog_thresh);
+bool arch_perf_nmi_is_available(void);
 #endif
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_CHECK_TIMESTAMP) && \
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c b/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
index a55a6eab1b3a..0d1c292a655d 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
@@ -234,12 +234,22 @@ void __init hardlockup_detector_perf_restart(void)
 	}
 }
 
+bool __weak __init arch_perf_nmi_is_available(void)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * watchdog_hardlockup_probe - Probe whether NMI event is available at all
  */
 int __init watchdog_hardlockup_probe(void)
 {
-	int ret = hardlockup_detector_event_create();
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!arch_perf_nmi_is_available())
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	ret = hardlockup_detector_event_create();
 
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_info("Perf NMI watchdog permanently disabled\n");
-- 
2.40.1.521.gf1e218fcd8-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	ricardo.neri@intel.com, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@chromium.org>,
	Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
	Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, davem@davemloft.net,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 14/17] watchdog/perf: Add a weak function for an arch to detect if perf can use NMIs
Date: Thu,  4 May 2023 15:13:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230504151100.v4.14.Ic55cb6f90ef5967d8aaa2b503a4e67c753f64d3a@changeid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230504221349.1535669-1-dianders@chromium.org>

On arm64, NMI support needs to be detected at runtime. Add a weak
function to the perf hardlockup detector so that an architecture can
implement it to detect whether NMIs are available.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
While I won't object to this patch landing, I consider it part of the
arm64 perf hardlockup effort. I would be OK with the earlier patches
in the series landing and then not landing ${SUBJECT} patch nor
anything else later.

I'll also note that, as an alternative to this, it would be nice if we
could figure out how to make perf_event_create_kernel_counter() fail
on arm64 if NMIs aren't available. Maybe we could add a "must_use_nmi"
element to "struct perf_event_attr"?

Changes in v4:
- ("Add a weak function for an arch to detect ...") new for v4.

 include/linux/nmi.h    |  1 +
 kernel/watchdog_perf.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/nmi.h b/include/linux/nmi.h
index 90aa33317b4c..9caea5ba494d 100644
--- a/include/linux/nmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/nmi.h
@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ static inline bool trigger_single_cpu_backtrace(int cpu)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF
 u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(int watchdog_thresh);
+bool arch_perf_nmi_is_available(void);
 #endif
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_CHECK_TIMESTAMP) && \
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c b/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
index a55a6eab1b3a..0d1c292a655d 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
@@ -234,12 +234,22 @@ void __init hardlockup_detector_perf_restart(void)
 	}
 }
 
+bool __weak __init arch_perf_nmi_is_available(void)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * watchdog_hardlockup_probe - Probe whether NMI event is available at all
  */
 int __init watchdog_hardlockup_probe(void)
 {
-	int ret = hardlockup_detector_event_create();
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!arch_perf_nmi_is_available())
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	ret = hardlockup_detector_event_create();
 
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_info("Perf NMI watchdog permanently disabled\n");
-- 
2.40.1.521.gf1e218fcd8-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-04 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 130+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-04 22:13 [PATCH v4 00/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Add the buddy hardlockup detector Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] watchdog/perf: Define dummy watchdog_update_hrtimer_threshold() on correct config Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05  2:43   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  2:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  2:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-11  8:39     ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-11  8:39       ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] watchdog: remove WATCHDOG_DEFAULT Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] watchdog/hardlockup: change watchdog_nmi_enable() to void Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05  2:45   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  2:45     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  2:45     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] watchdog/perf: Ensure CPU-bound context when creating hardlockup detector event Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Rename touch_nmi_watchdog() to touch_hardlockup_watchdog() Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05  2:51   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  2:51     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  2:51     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05 16:37     ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-05 16:37       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-05 16:37       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-08  1:34       ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08  1:34         ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08  1:34         ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08 15:56         ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-08 15:56           ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-11  9:24       ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-11  9:24         ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] watchdog/perf: Rename watchdog_hld.c to watchdog_perf.c Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05  2:53   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  2:53     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  2:53     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-11 10:09   ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-11 10:09     ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Move perf hardlockup checking/panic to common watchdog.c Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05  2:58   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  2:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  2:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05 16:37     ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-05 16:37       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-05 16:37       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-11 12:03       ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-11 12:03         ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Style changes to watchdog_hardlockup_check() / ..._is_lockedup() Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05  3:01   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  3:01     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  3:01     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05 16:38     ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-05 16:38       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-05 16:38       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-11 12:45       ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-11 12:45         ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Add a "cpu" param to watchdog_hardlockup_check() Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-11 14:14   ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-11 14:14     ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-19 17:21     ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-19 17:21       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-19 17:21       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Move perf hardlockup watchdog petting to watchdog.c Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-11 15:46   ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-11 15:46     ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-19 17:22     ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-19 17:22       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-19 17:22       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Rename some "NMI watchdog" constants/function Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05  3:06   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  3:06     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  3:06     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05 16:38     ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-05 16:38       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-05 16:38       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-12 11:21     ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-12 11:21       ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] watchdog/hardlockup: Have the perf hardlockup use __weak functions more cleanly Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-12 11:55   ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-12 11:55     ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] watchdog/hardlockup: detect hard lockups using secondary (buddy) CPUs Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-05  2:35   ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  2:35     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05  2:35     ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-05 16:35     ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-05 16:35       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-05 16:35       ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-08  1:04       ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08  1:04         ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08  1:04         ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-05-08 15:52         ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-08 15:52           ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-19 17:23           ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-19 17:23             ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-19 17:23             ` Doug Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` Douglas Anderson [this message]
2023-05-04 22:13   ` [PATCH v4 14/17] watchdog/perf: Add a weak function for an arch to detect if perf can use NMIs Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] watchdog/perf: Adapt the watchdog_perf interface for async model Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] arm64: add hw_nmi_get_sample_period for preparation of lockup detector Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] arm64: Enable perf events based hard " Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-05-04 22:13   ` Douglas Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230504151100.v4.14.Ic55cb6f90ef5967d8aaa2b503a4e67c753f64d3a@changeid \
    --to=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=groeck@chromium.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=tzungbi@chromium.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.