All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
	 rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Cc: andi.shyti@linux.intel.com, trix@redhat.com,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	ndesaulniers@google.com, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	fei.yang@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gt: Fix second parameter type of pre-gen8 pte_encode callbacks
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 11:24:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230530-i915-gt-cache_level-wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict-v1-1-54501d598229@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230530-i915-gt-cache_level-wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict-v1-0-54501d598229@kernel.org>

When booting a kernel compiled with CONFIG_CFI_CLANG (kCFI), there is a
CFI failure in ggtt_probe_common() when trying to call hsw_pte_encode()
via an indirect call:

  [    5.030027] CFI failure at ggtt_probe_common+0xd1/0x130 [i915] (target: hsw_pte_encode+0x0/0x30 [i915]; expected type: 0xf5c1d0fc)

With kCFI, indirect calls are validated against their expected type
versus actual type and failures occur when the two types do not match.

clang's -Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict can catch this at
compile time but it is not enabled for the kernel yet:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1155:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = iris_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1157:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = hsw_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1159:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = byt_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1161:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = ivb_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1163:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = snb_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  5 errors generated.

In this case, the pre-gen8 pte_encode functions have a second parameter
type of 'enum i915_cache_level' whereas the function pointer prototype
in 'struct i915_address_space' expects a second parameter type of
'unsigned int'.

Update the second parameter of the callbacks and the comment above them
noting that these statements are still valid, which matches other
functions and files, to clear up the kCFI failures at run time.

Fixes: 9275277d5324 ("drm/i915: use pat_index instead of cache_level")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
index 2a7942fac798..122197737ef2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
@@ -1015,16 +1015,16 @@ static int gen8_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 
 /*
  * For pre-gen8 platforms pat_index is the same as enum i915_cache_level,
- * so these PTE encode functions are left with using cache_level.
+ * so the switch-case statements in these PTE encode functions are still valid.
  * See translation table LEGACY_CACHELEVEL.
  */
 static u64 snb_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			  enum i915_cache_level level,
+			  unsigned int pat_index,
 			  u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
 
-	switch (level) {
+	switch (pat_index) {
 	case I915_CACHE_L3_LLC:
 	case I915_CACHE_LLC:
 		pte |= GEN6_PTE_CACHE_LLC;
@@ -1033,19 +1033,19 @@ static u64 snb_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
 		pte |= GEN6_PTE_UNCACHED;
 		break;
 	default:
-		MISSING_CASE(level);
+		MISSING_CASE(pat_index);
 	}
 
 	return pte;
 }
 
 static u64 ivb_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			  enum i915_cache_level level,
+			  unsigned int pat_index,
 			  u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
 
-	switch (level) {
+	switch (pat_index) {
 	case I915_CACHE_L3_LLC:
 		pte |= GEN7_PTE_CACHE_L3_LLC;
 		break;
@@ -1056,14 +1056,14 @@ static u64 ivb_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
 		pte |= GEN6_PTE_UNCACHED;
 		break;
 	default:
-		MISSING_CASE(level);
+		MISSING_CASE(pat_index);
 	}
 
 	return pte;
 }
 
 static u64 byt_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			  enum i915_cache_level level,
+			  unsigned int pat_index,
 			  u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
@@ -1071,31 +1071,31 @@ static u64 byt_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
 	if (!(flags & PTE_READ_ONLY))
 		pte |= BYT_PTE_WRITEABLE;
 
-	if (level != I915_CACHE_NONE)
+	if (pat_index != I915_CACHE_NONE)
 		pte |= BYT_PTE_SNOOPED_BY_CPU_CACHES;
 
 	return pte;
 }
 
 static u64 hsw_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			  enum i915_cache_level level,
+			  unsigned int pat_index,
 			  u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = HSW_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
 
-	if (level != I915_CACHE_NONE)
+	if (pat_index != I915_CACHE_NONE)
 		pte |= HSW_WB_LLC_AGE3;
 
 	return pte;
 }
 
 static u64 iris_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			   enum i915_cache_level level,
+			   unsigned int pat_index,
 			   u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = HSW_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
 
-	switch (level) {
+	switch (pat_index) {
 	case I915_CACHE_NONE:
 		break;
 	case I915_CACHE_WT:

-- 
2.40.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
	 rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Cc: trix@redhat.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, ndesaulniers@google.com,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gt: Fix second parameter type of pre-gen8 pte_encode callbacks
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 11:24:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230530-i915-gt-cache_level-wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict-v1-1-54501d598229@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230530-i915-gt-cache_level-wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict-v1-0-54501d598229@kernel.org>

When booting a kernel compiled with CONFIG_CFI_CLANG (kCFI), there is a
CFI failure in ggtt_probe_common() when trying to call hsw_pte_encode()
via an indirect call:

  [    5.030027] CFI failure at ggtt_probe_common+0xd1/0x130 [i915] (target: hsw_pte_encode+0x0/0x30 [i915]; expected type: 0xf5c1d0fc)

With kCFI, indirect calls are validated against their expected type
versus actual type and failures occur when the two types do not match.

clang's -Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict can catch this at
compile time but it is not enabled for the kernel yet:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1155:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = iris_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1157:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = hsw_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1159:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = byt_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1161:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = ivb_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1163:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = snb_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  5 errors generated.

In this case, the pre-gen8 pte_encode functions have a second parameter
type of 'enum i915_cache_level' whereas the function pointer prototype
in 'struct i915_address_space' expects a second parameter type of
'unsigned int'.

Update the second parameter of the callbacks and the comment above them
noting that these statements are still valid, which matches other
functions and files, to clear up the kCFI failures at run time.

Fixes: 9275277d5324 ("drm/i915: use pat_index instead of cache_level")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
index 2a7942fac798..122197737ef2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
@@ -1015,16 +1015,16 @@ static int gen8_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 
 /*
  * For pre-gen8 platforms pat_index is the same as enum i915_cache_level,
- * so these PTE encode functions are left with using cache_level.
+ * so the switch-case statements in these PTE encode functions are still valid.
  * See translation table LEGACY_CACHELEVEL.
  */
 static u64 snb_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			  enum i915_cache_level level,
+			  unsigned int pat_index,
 			  u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
 
-	switch (level) {
+	switch (pat_index) {
 	case I915_CACHE_L3_LLC:
 	case I915_CACHE_LLC:
 		pte |= GEN6_PTE_CACHE_LLC;
@@ -1033,19 +1033,19 @@ static u64 snb_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
 		pte |= GEN6_PTE_UNCACHED;
 		break;
 	default:
-		MISSING_CASE(level);
+		MISSING_CASE(pat_index);
 	}
 
 	return pte;
 }
 
 static u64 ivb_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			  enum i915_cache_level level,
+			  unsigned int pat_index,
 			  u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
 
-	switch (level) {
+	switch (pat_index) {
 	case I915_CACHE_L3_LLC:
 		pte |= GEN7_PTE_CACHE_L3_LLC;
 		break;
@@ -1056,14 +1056,14 @@ static u64 ivb_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
 		pte |= GEN6_PTE_UNCACHED;
 		break;
 	default:
-		MISSING_CASE(level);
+		MISSING_CASE(pat_index);
 	}
 
 	return pte;
 }
 
 static u64 byt_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			  enum i915_cache_level level,
+			  unsigned int pat_index,
 			  u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
@@ -1071,31 +1071,31 @@ static u64 byt_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
 	if (!(flags & PTE_READ_ONLY))
 		pte |= BYT_PTE_WRITEABLE;
 
-	if (level != I915_CACHE_NONE)
+	if (pat_index != I915_CACHE_NONE)
 		pte |= BYT_PTE_SNOOPED_BY_CPU_CACHES;
 
 	return pte;
 }
 
 static u64 hsw_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			  enum i915_cache_level level,
+			  unsigned int pat_index,
 			  u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = HSW_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
 
-	if (level != I915_CACHE_NONE)
+	if (pat_index != I915_CACHE_NONE)
 		pte |= HSW_WB_LLC_AGE3;
 
 	return pte;
 }
 
 static u64 iris_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			   enum i915_cache_level level,
+			   unsigned int pat_index,
 			   u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = HSW_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
 
-	switch (level) {
+	switch (pat_index) {
 	case I915_CACHE_NONE:
 		break;
 	case I915_CACHE_WT:

-- 
2.40.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
	 rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Cc: ndesaulniers@google.com, trix@redhat.com,
	andi.shyti@linux.intel.com,  fei.yang@intel.com,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	 dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	 patches@lists.linux.dev, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gt: Fix second parameter type of pre-gen8 pte_encode callbacks
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 11:24:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230530-i915-gt-cache_level-wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict-v1-1-54501d598229@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230530-i915-gt-cache_level-wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict-v1-0-54501d598229@kernel.org>

When booting a kernel compiled with CONFIG_CFI_CLANG (kCFI), there is a
CFI failure in ggtt_probe_common() when trying to call hsw_pte_encode()
via an indirect call:

  [    5.030027] CFI failure at ggtt_probe_common+0xd1/0x130 [i915] (target: hsw_pte_encode+0x0/0x30 [i915]; expected type: 0xf5c1d0fc)

With kCFI, indirect calls are validated against their expected type
versus actual type and failures occur when the two types do not match.

clang's -Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict can catch this at
compile time but it is not enabled for the kernel yet:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1155:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = iris_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1157:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = hsw_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1159:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = byt_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1161:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = ivb_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:1163:23: error: incompatible function pointer types assigning to 'u64 (*)(dma_addr_t, unsigned int, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (*)(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)') from 'u64 (dma_addr_t,
  enum i915_cache_level, u32)' (aka 'unsigned long long (unsigned int, enum i915_cache_level, unsigned int)') [-Werror,-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict]
                  ggtt->vm.pte_encode = snb_pte_encode;
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  5 errors generated.

In this case, the pre-gen8 pte_encode functions have a second parameter
type of 'enum i915_cache_level' whereas the function pointer prototype
in 'struct i915_address_space' expects a second parameter type of
'unsigned int'.

Update the second parameter of the callbacks and the comment above them
noting that these statements are still valid, which matches other
functions and files, to clear up the kCFI failures at run time.

Fixes: 9275277d5324 ("drm/i915: use pat_index instead of cache_level")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
index 2a7942fac798..122197737ef2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
@@ -1015,16 +1015,16 @@ static int gen8_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 
 /*
  * For pre-gen8 platforms pat_index is the same as enum i915_cache_level,
- * so these PTE encode functions are left with using cache_level.
+ * so the switch-case statements in these PTE encode functions are still valid.
  * See translation table LEGACY_CACHELEVEL.
  */
 static u64 snb_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			  enum i915_cache_level level,
+			  unsigned int pat_index,
 			  u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
 
-	switch (level) {
+	switch (pat_index) {
 	case I915_CACHE_L3_LLC:
 	case I915_CACHE_LLC:
 		pte |= GEN6_PTE_CACHE_LLC;
@@ -1033,19 +1033,19 @@ static u64 snb_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
 		pte |= GEN6_PTE_UNCACHED;
 		break;
 	default:
-		MISSING_CASE(level);
+		MISSING_CASE(pat_index);
 	}
 
 	return pte;
 }
 
 static u64 ivb_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			  enum i915_cache_level level,
+			  unsigned int pat_index,
 			  u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
 
-	switch (level) {
+	switch (pat_index) {
 	case I915_CACHE_L3_LLC:
 		pte |= GEN7_PTE_CACHE_L3_LLC;
 		break;
@@ -1056,14 +1056,14 @@ static u64 ivb_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
 		pte |= GEN6_PTE_UNCACHED;
 		break;
 	default:
-		MISSING_CASE(level);
+		MISSING_CASE(pat_index);
 	}
 
 	return pte;
 }
 
 static u64 byt_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			  enum i915_cache_level level,
+			  unsigned int pat_index,
 			  u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
@@ -1071,31 +1071,31 @@ static u64 byt_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
 	if (!(flags & PTE_READ_ONLY))
 		pte |= BYT_PTE_WRITEABLE;
 
-	if (level != I915_CACHE_NONE)
+	if (pat_index != I915_CACHE_NONE)
 		pte |= BYT_PTE_SNOOPED_BY_CPU_CACHES;
 
 	return pte;
 }
 
 static u64 hsw_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			  enum i915_cache_level level,
+			  unsigned int pat_index,
 			  u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = HSW_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
 
-	if (level != I915_CACHE_NONE)
+	if (pat_index != I915_CACHE_NONE)
 		pte |= HSW_WB_LLC_AGE3;
 
 	return pte;
 }
 
 static u64 iris_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
-			   enum i915_cache_level level,
+			   unsigned int pat_index,
 			   u32 flags)
 {
 	gen6_pte_t pte = HSW_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr) | GEN6_PTE_VALID;
 
-	switch (level) {
+	switch (pat_index) {
 	case I915_CACHE_NONE:
 		break;
 	case I915_CACHE_WT:

-- 
2.40.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-30 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-30 18:24 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/gt: Fix recent kCFI violations Nathan Chancellor
2023-05-30 18:24 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-05-30 18:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nathan Chancellor
2023-05-30 18:24 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2023-05-30 18:24   ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gt: Fix second parameter type of pre-gen8 pte_encode callbacks Nathan Chancellor
2023-05-30 18:24   ` [Intel-gfx] " Nathan Chancellor
2023-05-30 18:54   ` Andi Shyti
2023-05-30 18:54     ` Andi Shyti
2023-05-30 18:54     ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2023-05-30 19:05   ` Yang, Fei
2023-05-30 19:05     ` [Intel-gfx] " Yang, Fei
2023-05-30 19:05     ` Yang, Fei
2023-05-30 18:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gt: Fix parameter in gmch_ggtt_insert_{entries,page}() Nathan Chancellor
2023-05-30 18:24   ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-05-30 18:24   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gt: Fix parameter in gmch_ggtt_insert_{entries, page}() Nathan Chancellor
2023-05-30 18:55   ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gt: Fix parameter in gmch_ggtt_insert_{entries,page}() Andi Shyti
2023-05-30 18:55     ` Andi Shyti
2023-05-30 18:55     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gt: Fix parameter in gmch_ggtt_insert_{entries, page}() Andi Shyti
2023-05-30 19:08   ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gt: Fix parameter in gmch_ggtt_insert_{entries,page}() Yang, Fei
2023-05-30 19:08     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gt: Fix parameter in gmch_ggtt_insert_{entries, page}() Yang, Fei
2023-05-30 19:08     ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gt: Fix parameter in gmch_ggtt_insert_{entries,page}() Yang, Fei
2023-05-31 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gt: Fix recent kCFI violations Patchwork
2023-05-31 13:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-05-31 13:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-06-01 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2023-06-02  1:03 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Andi Shyti
2023-06-02  1:03   ` Andi Shyti
2023-06-02  1:03   ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230530-i915-gt-cache_level-wincompatible-function-pointer-types-strict-v1-1-54501d598229@kernel.org \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=fei.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.