All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rhys Rustad-Elliott <me@rhysre.net>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Rhys Rustad-Elliott <me@rhysre.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: Fix elem_size not being set for inner maps
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 19:02:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230602190110.47068-2-me@rhysre.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230602190110.47068-1-me@rhysre.net>

Commit d937bc3449fa ("bpf: make uniform use of array->elem_size
everywhere in arraymap.c") changed array_map_gen_lookup to use
array->elem_size instead of round_up(map->value_size, 8) as the element
size when generating code to access a value in an array map.

array->elem_size, however, is not set by bpf_map_meta_alloc when
initializing an BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS or BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS.
This results in array_map_gen_lookup incorrectly outputting code that
always accesses index 0 in the array (as the index will be calculated
via a multiplication with the element size, which is incorrectly set to
0).

Set elem_size on the bpf_array object when allocating an array or hash
of maps to fix this.

Fixes: d937bc3449fa ("bpf: make uniform use of array->elem_size everywhere in arraymap.c")
Signed-off-by: Rhys Rustad-Elliott <me@rhysre.net>
---
 kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c b/kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c
index 2c5c64c2a53b..cd5eafaba97e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c
@@ -69,9 +69,13 @@ struct bpf_map *bpf_map_meta_alloc(int inner_map_ufd)
 	/* Misc members not needed in bpf_map_meta_equal() check. */
 	inner_map_meta->ops = inner_map->ops;
 	if (inner_map->ops == &array_map_ops) {
+		struct bpf_array *inner_array_meta =
+			container_of(inner_map_meta, struct bpf_array, map);
+		struct bpf_array *inner_array = container_of(inner_map, struct bpf_array, map);
+
+		inner_array_meta->index_mask = inner_array->index_mask;
+		inner_array_meta->elem_size = inner_array->elem_size;
 		inner_map_meta->bypass_spec_v1 = inner_map->bypass_spec_v1;
-		container_of(inner_map_meta, struct bpf_array, map)->index_mask =
-		     container_of(inner_map, struct bpf_array, map)->index_mask;
 	}
 
 	fdput(f);
-- 
2.40.1



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rhys Rustad-Elliott <me@rhysre.net>
Cc: Rhys Rustad-Elliott <me@rhysre.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: Fix elem_size not being set for inner maps
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 19:02:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230602190110.47068-2-me@rhysre.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230602190110.47068-1-me@rhysre.net>

Commit d937bc3449fa ("bpf: make uniform use of array->elem_size
everywhere in arraymap.c") changed array_map_gen_lookup to use
array->elem_size instead of round_up(map->value_size, 8) as the element
size when generating code to access a value in an array map.

array->elem_size, however, is not set by bpf_map_meta_alloc when
initializing an BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS or BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS.
This results in array_map_gen_lookup incorrectly outputting code that
always accesses index 0 in the array (as the index will be calculated
via a multiplication with the element size, which is incorrectly set to
0).

Set elem_size on the bpf_array object when allocating an array or hash
of maps to fix this.

Fixes: d937bc3449fa ("bpf: make uniform use of array->elem_size everywhere in arraymap.c")
Signed-off-by: Rhys Rustad-Elliott <me@rhysre.net>
---
 kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c b/kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c
index 2c5c64c2a53b..cd5eafaba97e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/map_in_map.c
@@ -69,9 +69,13 @@ struct bpf_map *bpf_map_meta_alloc(int inner_map_ufd)
 	/* Misc members not needed in bpf_map_meta_equal() check. */
 	inner_map_meta->ops = inner_map->ops;
 	if (inner_map->ops == &array_map_ops) {
+		struct bpf_array *inner_array_meta =
+			container_of(inner_map_meta, struct bpf_array, map);
+		struct bpf_array *inner_array = container_of(inner_map, struct bpf_array, map);
+
+		inner_array_meta->index_mask = inner_array->index_mask;
+		inner_array_meta->elem_size = inner_array->elem_size;
 		inner_map_meta->bypass_spec_v1 = inner_map->bypass_spec_v1;
-		container_of(inner_map_meta, struct bpf_array, map)->index_mask =
-		     container_of(inner_map, struct bpf_array, map)->index_mask;
 	}
 
 	fdput(f);
-- 
2.40.1



  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-02 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-02 19:01 [PATCH bpf v2 0/2] Fix elem_size not being set for inner maps Rhys Rustad-Elliott
2023-06-02 19:01 ` Rhys Rustad-Elliott
2023-06-02 19:02 ` Rhys Rustad-Elliott [this message]
2023-06-02 19:02   ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: " Rhys Rustad-Elliott
2023-06-02 19:02 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add access_inner_map selftest Rhys Rustad-Elliott
2023-06-02 19:02   ` Rhys Rustad-Elliott
2023-06-03  0:27   ` Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230602190110.47068-2-me@rhysre.net \
    --to=me@rhysre.net \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.