All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
To: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Emma Anholt <emma@anholt.net>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	"Javier Martinez Canillas" <javierm@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Maíra Canal" <mairacanal@riseup.net>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/11] drm/vc4: tests: mock: Use a kunit action to unregister DRM device
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 11:06:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230728-kms-kunit-actions-rework-v3-8-952565ccccfe@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728-kms-kunit-actions-rework-v3-0-952565ccccfe@kernel.org>

The *_mock_device functions allocate a DRM device that needs to be
released using drm_dev_unregister.

Now that we have a kunit release action API, we can switch to it and
don't require any kind of garbage collection from the caller.

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c           | 12 ++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c |  6 ------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c
index a4bed26af32f..63ca46f4cb35 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c
@@ -153,6 +153,13 @@ static int __build_mock(struct kunit *test, struct drm_device *drm,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void kunit_action_drm_dev_unregister(void *ptr)
+{
+	struct drm_device *drm = ptr;
+
+	drm_dev_unregister(drm);
+}
+
 static struct vc4_dev *__mock_device(struct kunit *test, bool is_vc5)
 {
 	struct drm_device *drm;
@@ -186,6 +193,11 @@ static struct vc4_dev *__mock_device(struct kunit *test, bool is_vc5)
 	ret = drm_dev_register(drm, 0);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
 
+	ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test,
+					kunit_action_drm_dev_unregister,
+					drm);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
 	return vc4;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c
index 6c982e72cae8..776a7b01608f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c
@@ -754,14 +754,11 @@ static int vc4_pv_muxing_test_init(struct kunit *test)
 static void vc4_pv_muxing_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct pv_muxing_priv *priv = test->priv;
-	struct vc4_dev *vc4 = priv->vc4;
-	struct drm_device *drm = &vc4->base;
 	struct drm_atomic_state *state = priv->state;
 
 	drm_atomic_state_put(state);
 	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&priv->ctx);
 	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&priv->ctx);
-	drm_dev_unregister(drm);
 }
 
 static struct kunit_case vc4_pv_muxing_tests[] = {
@@ -871,7 +868,6 @@ static void drm_test_vc5_pv_muxing_bugs_subsequent_crtc_enable(struct kunit *tes
 	drm_atomic_state_put(state);
 	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
 	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
-	drm_dev_unregister(drm);
 }
 
 static void drm_test_vc5_pv_muxing_bugs_stable_fifo(struct kunit *test)
@@ -960,7 +956,6 @@ static void drm_test_vc5_pv_muxing_bugs_stable_fifo(struct kunit *test)
 	drm_atomic_state_put(state);
 	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
 	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
-	drm_dev_unregister(drm);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -1013,7 +1008,6 @@ drm_test_vc5_pv_muxing_bugs_subsequent_crtc_enable_too_many_crtc_state(struct ku
 	drm_atomic_state_put(state);
 	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
 	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
-	drm_dev_unregister(drm);
 }
 
 static struct kunit_case vc5_pv_muxing_bugs_tests[] = {

-- 
2.41.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
To: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Emma Anholt <emma@anholt.net>
Cc: "Maíra Canal" <mairacanal@riseup.net>,
	"Javier Martinez Canillas" <javierm@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/11] drm/vc4: tests: mock: Use a kunit action to unregister DRM device
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 11:06:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230728-kms-kunit-actions-rework-v3-8-952565ccccfe@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728-kms-kunit-actions-rework-v3-0-952565ccccfe@kernel.org>

The *_mock_device functions allocate a DRM device that needs to be
released using drm_dev_unregister.

Now that we have a kunit release action API, we can switch to it and
don't require any kind of garbage collection from the caller.

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c           | 12 ++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c |  6 ------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c
index a4bed26af32f..63ca46f4cb35 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_mock.c
@@ -153,6 +153,13 @@ static int __build_mock(struct kunit *test, struct drm_device *drm,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void kunit_action_drm_dev_unregister(void *ptr)
+{
+	struct drm_device *drm = ptr;
+
+	drm_dev_unregister(drm);
+}
+
 static struct vc4_dev *__mock_device(struct kunit *test, bool is_vc5)
 {
 	struct drm_device *drm;
@@ -186,6 +193,11 @@ static struct vc4_dev *__mock_device(struct kunit *test, bool is_vc5)
 	ret = drm_dev_register(drm, 0);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
 
+	ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test,
+					kunit_action_drm_dev_unregister,
+					drm);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
 	return vc4;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c
index 6c982e72cae8..776a7b01608f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/tests/vc4_test_pv_muxing.c
@@ -754,14 +754,11 @@ static int vc4_pv_muxing_test_init(struct kunit *test)
 static void vc4_pv_muxing_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct pv_muxing_priv *priv = test->priv;
-	struct vc4_dev *vc4 = priv->vc4;
-	struct drm_device *drm = &vc4->base;
 	struct drm_atomic_state *state = priv->state;
 
 	drm_atomic_state_put(state);
 	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&priv->ctx);
 	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&priv->ctx);
-	drm_dev_unregister(drm);
 }
 
 static struct kunit_case vc4_pv_muxing_tests[] = {
@@ -871,7 +868,6 @@ static void drm_test_vc5_pv_muxing_bugs_subsequent_crtc_enable(struct kunit *tes
 	drm_atomic_state_put(state);
 	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
 	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
-	drm_dev_unregister(drm);
 }
 
 static void drm_test_vc5_pv_muxing_bugs_stable_fifo(struct kunit *test)
@@ -960,7 +956,6 @@ static void drm_test_vc5_pv_muxing_bugs_stable_fifo(struct kunit *test)
 	drm_atomic_state_put(state);
 	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
 	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
-	drm_dev_unregister(drm);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -1013,7 +1008,6 @@ drm_test_vc5_pv_muxing_bugs_subsequent_crtc_enable_too_many_crtc_state(struct ku
 	drm_atomic_state_put(state);
 	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
 	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
-	drm_dev_unregister(drm);
 }
 
 static struct kunit_case vc5_pv_muxing_bugs_tests[] = {

-- 
2.41.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-28  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-28  9:06 [PATCH v3 00/11] drm: kunit: Switch to kunit actions Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] drm/tests: helpers: " Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] drm/tests: client-modeset: Remove call to drm_kunit_helper_free_device() Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] drm/tests: modes: " Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] drm/tests: probe-helper: " Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] drm/tests: helpers: Create a helper to allocate a locking ctx Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] drm/tests: helpers: Create a helper to allocate an atomic state Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] drm/vc4: tests: pv-muxing: Remove call to drm_kunit_helper_free_device() Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2023-07-28  9:06   ` [PATCH v3 08/11] drm/vc4: tests: mock: Use a kunit action to unregister DRM device Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] drm/vc4: tests: pv-muxing: Switch to managed locking init Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] drm/vc4: tests: Switch to atomic state allocation helper Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] drm/vc4: tests: pv-muxing: Document test scenario Maxime Ripard
2023-07-28  9:06   ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-31 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] drm: kunit: Switch to kunit actions Maxime Ripard
2023-07-31 12:23   ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230728-kms-kunit-actions-rework-v3-8-952565ccccfe@kernel.org \
    --to=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=emma@anholt.net \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mairacanal@riseup.net \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.