From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Damian Tometzki <dtometzki@fedoraproject.org>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org>,
Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] memfd: drop warning for missing exec-related flags
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023 17:02:06 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230906-memfd-reduce-spam-v1-1-1f0d35facd95@cyphar.com> (raw)
Commit 434ed3350f57 ("memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing
exec-related flags") attempted to make these warnings more useful (so
they would work as an incentive to get users to switch to specifying
these flags -- as intended by the original MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL patchset).
Unfortunately, it turns out that even INFO-level logging is too extreme
to enable by default and alternative solutions to the spam issue (such
as doing more extreme rate-limiting per-task) are either too ugly or
overkill for something as simple as emitting a log as a developer aid.
Given that the flags are new and there is no harm to not specifying them
(after all, we maintain backwards compatibility) we can just drop the
warnings for now until some time in the future when most programs have
migrated and distributions start using vm.memfd_noexec=1 (where failing
to pass the flag would result in unexpected errors for programs that use
executable memfds).
Fixes: 434ed3350f57 ("memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related flags")
Reported-by: Damian Tometzki <dtometzki@fedoraproject.org>
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
---
mm/memfd.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c
index 1cad1904fc26..d3a1ba4208c9 100644
--- a/mm/memfd.c
+++ b/mm/memfd.c
@@ -315,12 +315,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create,
if ((flags & MFD_EXEC) && (flags & MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL))
return -EINVAL;
- if (!(flags & (MFD_EXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL))) {
- pr_info_ratelimited(
- "%s[%d]: memfd_create() called without MFD_EXEC or MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL set\n",
- current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
- }
-
error = check_sysctl_memfd_noexec(&flags);
if (error < 0)
return error;
---
base-commit: 2374b401b0e0b9ab6d91eead30f9a049f8d620cf
change-id: 20230906-memfd-reduce-spam-8788fc0b951e
Best regards,
--
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
next reply other threads:[~2023-09-06 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-06 7:02 Aleksa Sarai [this message]
2023-09-06 7:13 ` [PATCH] memfd: drop warning for missing exec-related flags Christian Brauner
2023-09-10 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230906-memfd-reduce-spam-v1-1-1f0d35facd95@cyphar.com \
--to=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dtometzki@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=dverkamp@chromium.org \
--cc=jeffxu@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.