All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com, Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v13 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs
Date: Wed,  6 Sep 2023 09:02:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230906090246.v13.1.I1223c11c88937bd0cbd9b086d4ef216985797302@changeid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230906160505.2431857-1-dianders@chromium.org>

As of commit 6abbd6988971 ("irqchip/gic, gic-v3: Make SGIs use
handle_percpu_devid_irq()") SGIs are treated the same as PPIs/EPPIs
and use handle_percpu_devid_irq() by default. Unfortunately,
handle_percpu_devid_irq() isn't NMI safe, and so to run in an NMI
context those should use handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi().

In order to accomplish this, we just have to make room for SGIs in the
array of refcounts that keeps track of which interrupts are set as
NMI. We also rename the array and create a new indexing scheme that
accounts for SGIs.

Also, enable NMI support prior to gic_smp_init() as allocation of SGIs
as IRQs/NMIs happen as part of this routine.

Co-developed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
I'll note that this change is a little more black magic to me than
others in this series. I don't have a massive amounts of familiarity
with all the moving parts of gic-v3, so I mostly just followed Mark
Rutland's advice [1].

As per discussion [2], the hope is that this patch could get Acked by
Marc Zyngier and then land through the arm64 tree. If this isn't a
good idea for some reason, I'd love suggestions for alternate ways for
this series to land.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZNC-YRQopO0PaIIo@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZPC1nUw3qKWrC85l@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com

Changes in v13:
- s/_idx/_index/ on the patch to make function names consistent.

Changes in v12:
- Added a comment about why we account for 16 SGIs when Linux uses 8.

Changes in v10:
- Rewrite as needed for 5.11+ as per Mark Rutland and Sumit.

 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index eedfa8e9f077..787ccc880b22 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -78,6 +78,13 @@ static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(supports_deactivate_key);
 #define GIC_LINE_NR	min(GICD_TYPER_SPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer), 1020U)
 #define GIC_ESPI_NR	GICD_TYPER_ESPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer)
 
+/*
+ * There are 16 SGIs, though we only actually use 8 in Linux. The other 8 SGIs
+ * are potentially stolen by the secure side. Some code, especially code dealing
+ * with hwirq IDs, is simplified by accounting for all 16.
+ */
+#define SGI_NR		16
+
 /*
  * The behaviours of RPR and PMR registers differ depending on the value of
  * SCR_EL3.FIQ, and the behaviour of non-secure priority registers of the
@@ -125,8 +132,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(gic_nonsecure_priorities);
 		__priority;						\
 	})
 
-/* ppi_nmi_refs[n] == number of cpus having ppi[n + 16] set as NMI */
-static refcount_t *ppi_nmi_refs;
+/* rdist_nmi_refs[n] == number of cpus having the rdist interrupt n set as NMI */
+static refcount_t *rdist_nmi_refs;
 
 static struct gic_kvm_info gic_v3_kvm_info __initdata;
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, has_rss);
@@ -519,9 +526,22 @@ static u32 __gic_get_ppi_index(irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
 	}
 }
 
-static u32 gic_get_ppi_index(struct irq_data *d)
+static u32 __gic_get_rdist_index(irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+	switch (__get_intid_range(hwirq)) {
+	case SGI_RANGE:
+	case PPI_RANGE:
+		return hwirq;
+	case EPPI_RANGE:
+		return hwirq - EPPI_BASE_INTID + 32;
+	default:
+		unreachable();
+	}
+}
+
+static u32 gic_get_rdist_index(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	return __gic_get_ppi_index(d->hwirq);
+	return __gic_get_rdist_index(d->hwirq);
 }
 
 static int gic_irq_nmi_setup(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -545,11 +565,14 @@ static int gic_irq_nmi_setup(struct irq_data *d)
 
 	/* desc lock should already be held */
 	if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d)) {
-		u32 idx = gic_get_ppi_index(d);
+		u32 idx = gic_get_rdist_index(d);
 
-		/* Setting up PPI as NMI, only switch handler for first NMI */
-		if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&ppi_nmi_refs[idx])) {
-			refcount_set(&ppi_nmi_refs[idx], 1);
+		/*
+		 * Setting up a percpu interrupt as NMI, only switch handler
+		 * for first NMI
+		 */
+		if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&rdist_nmi_refs[idx])) {
+			refcount_set(&rdist_nmi_refs[idx], 1);
 			desc->handle_irq = handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi;
 		}
 	} else {
@@ -582,10 +605,10 @@ static void gic_irq_nmi_teardown(struct irq_data *d)
 
 	/* desc lock should already be held */
 	if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d)) {
-		u32 idx = gic_get_ppi_index(d);
+		u32 idx = gic_get_rdist_index(d);
 
 		/* Tearing down NMI, only switch handler for last NMI */
-		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ppi_nmi_refs[idx]))
+		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&rdist_nmi_refs[idx]))
 			desc->handle_irq = handle_percpu_devid_irq;
 	} else {
 		desc->handle_irq = handle_fasteoi_irq;
@@ -1279,10 +1302,10 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(void)
 	rbase = gic_data_rdist_sgi_base();
 
 	/* Configure SGIs/PPIs as non-secure Group-1 */
-	for (i = 0; i < gic_data.ppi_nr + 16; i += 32)
+	for (i = 0; i < gic_data.ppi_nr + SGI_NR; i += 32)
 		writel_relaxed(~0, rbase + GICR_IGROUPR0 + i / 8);
 
-	gic_cpu_config(rbase, gic_data.ppi_nr + 16, gic_redist_wait_for_rwp);
+	gic_cpu_config(rbase, gic_data.ppi_nr + SGI_NR, gic_redist_wait_for_rwp);
 
 	/* initialise system registers */
 	gic_cpu_sys_reg_init();
@@ -1939,12 +1962,13 @@ static void gic_enable_nmi_support(void)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	ppi_nmi_refs = kcalloc(gic_data.ppi_nr, sizeof(*ppi_nmi_refs), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!ppi_nmi_refs)
+	rdist_nmi_refs = kcalloc(gic_data.ppi_nr + SGI_NR,
+				 sizeof(*rdist_nmi_refs), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rdist_nmi_refs)
 		return;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < gic_data.ppi_nr; i++)
-		refcount_set(&ppi_nmi_refs[i], 0);
+	for (i = 0; i < gic_data.ppi_nr + SGI_NR; i++)
+		refcount_set(&rdist_nmi_refs[i], 0);
 
 	pr_info("Pseudo-NMIs enabled using %s ICC_PMR_EL1 synchronisation\n",
 		gic_has_relaxed_pmr_sync() ? "relaxed" : "forced");
@@ -2061,6 +2085,7 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(phys_addr_t dist_phys_base,
 
 	gic_dist_init();
 	gic_cpu_init();
+	gic_enable_nmi_support();
 	gic_smp_init();
 	gic_cpu_pm_init();
 
@@ -2073,8 +2098,6 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(phys_addr_t dist_phys_base,
 			gicv2m_init(handle, gic_data.domain);
 	}
 
-	gic_enable_nmi_support();
-
 	return 0;
 
 out_free:
-- 
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com, Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v13 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs
Date: Wed,  6 Sep 2023 09:02:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230906090246.v13.1.I1223c11c88937bd0cbd9b086d4ef216985797302@changeid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230906160505.2431857-1-dianders@chromium.org>

As of commit 6abbd6988971 ("irqchip/gic, gic-v3: Make SGIs use
handle_percpu_devid_irq()") SGIs are treated the same as PPIs/EPPIs
and use handle_percpu_devid_irq() by default. Unfortunately,
handle_percpu_devid_irq() isn't NMI safe, and so to run in an NMI
context those should use handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi().

In order to accomplish this, we just have to make room for SGIs in the
array of refcounts that keeps track of which interrupts are set as
NMI. We also rename the array and create a new indexing scheme that
accounts for SGIs.

Also, enable NMI support prior to gic_smp_init() as allocation of SGIs
as IRQs/NMIs happen as part of this routine.

Co-developed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
I'll note that this change is a little more black magic to me than
others in this series. I don't have a massive amounts of familiarity
with all the moving parts of gic-v3, so I mostly just followed Mark
Rutland's advice [1].

As per discussion [2], the hope is that this patch could get Acked by
Marc Zyngier and then land through the arm64 tree. If this isn't a
good idea for some reason, I'd love suggestions for alternate ways for
this series to land.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZNC-YRQopO0PaIIo@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZPC1nUw3qKWrC85l@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com

Changes in v13:
- s/_idx/_index/ on the patch to make function names consistent.

Changes in v12:
- Added a comment about why we account for 16 SGIs when Linux uses 8.

Changes in v10:
- Rewrite as needed for 5.11+ as per Mark Rutland and Sumit.

 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index eedfa8e9f077..787ccc880b22 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -78,6 +78,13 @@ static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(supports_deactivate_key);
 #define GIC_LINE_NR	min(GICD_TYPER_SPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer), 1020U)
 #define GIC_ESPI_NR	GICD_TYPER_ESPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer)
 
+/*
+ * There are 16 SGIs, though we only actually use 8 in Linux. The other 8 SGIs
+ * are potentially stolen by the secure side. Some code, especially code dealing
+ * with hwirq IDs, is simplified by accounting for all 16.
+ */
+#define SGI_NR		16
+
 /*
  * The behaviours of RPR and PMR registers differ depending on the value of
  * SCR_EL3.FIQ, and the behaviour of non-secure priority registers of the
@@ -125,8 +132,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(gic_nonsecure_priorities);
 		__priority;						\
 	})
 
-/* ppi_nmi_refs[n] == number of cpus having ppi[n + 16] set as NMI */
-static refcount_t *ppi_nmi_refs;
+/* rdist_nmi_refs[n] == number of cpus having the rdist interrupt n set as NMI */
+static refcount_t *rdist_nmi_refs;
 
 static struct gic_kvm_info gic_v3_kvm_info __initdata;
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, has_rss);
@@ -519,9 +526,22 @@ static u32 __gic_get_ppi_index(irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
 	}
 }
 
-static u32 gic_get_ppi_index(struct irq_data *d)
+static u32 __gic_get_rdist_index(irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+	switch (__get_intid_range(hwirq)) {
+	case SGI_RANGE:
+	case PPI_RANGE:
+		return hwirq;
+	case EPPI_RANGE:
+		return hwirq - EPPI_BASE_INTID + 32;
+	default:
+		unreachable();
+	}
+}
+
+static u32 gic_get_rdist_index(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	return __gic_get_ppi_index(d->hwirq);
+	return __gic_get_rdist_index(d->hwirq);
 }
 
 static int gic_irq_nmi_setup(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -545,11 +565,14 @@ static int gic_irq_nmi_setup(struct irq_data *d)
 
 	/* desc lock should already be held */
 	if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d)) {
-		u32 idx = gic_get_ppi_index(d);
+		u32 idx = gic_get_rdist_index(d);
 
-		/* Setting up PPI as NMI, only switch handler for first NMI */
-		if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&ppi_nmi_refs[idx])) {
-			refcount_set(&ppi_nmi_refs[idx], 1);
+		/*
+		 * Setting up a percpu interrupt as NMI, only switch handler
+		 * for first NMI
+		 */
+		if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&rdist_nmi_refs[idx])) {
+			refcount_set(&rdist_nmi_refs[idx], 1);
 			desc->handle_irq = handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi;
 		}
 	} else {
@@ -582,10 +605,10 @@ static void gic_irq_nmi_teardown(struct irq_data *d)
 
 	/* desc lock should already be held */
 	if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d)) {
-		u32 idx = gic_get_ppi_index(d);
+		u32 idx = gic_get_rdist_index(d);
 
 		/* Tearing down NMI, only switch handler for last NMI */
-		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ppi_nmi_refs[idx]))
+		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&rdist_nmi_refs[idx]))
 			desc->handle_irq = handle_percpu_devid_irq;
 	} else {
 		desc->handle_irq = handle_fasteoi_irq;
@@ -1279,10 +1302,10 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(void)
 	rbase = gic_data_rdist_sgi_base();
 
 	/* Configure SGIs/PPIs as non-secure Group-1 */
-	for (i = 0; i < gic_data.ppi_nr + 16; i += 32)
+	for (i = 0; i < gic_data.ppi_nr + SGI_NR; i += 32)
 		writel_relaxed(~0, rbase + GICR_IGROUPR0 + i / 8);
 
-	gic_cpu_config(rbase, gic_data.ppi_nr + 16, gic_redist_wait_for_rwp);
+	gic_cpu_config(rbase, gic_data.ppi_nr + SGI_NR, gic_redist_wait_for_rwp);
 
 	/* initialise system registers */
 	gic_cpu_sys_reg_init();
@@ -1939,12 +1962,13 @@ static void gic_enable_nmi_support(void)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	ppi_nmi_refs = kcalloc(gic_data.ppi_nr, sizeof(*ppi_nmi_refs), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!ppi_nmi_refs)
+	rdist_nmi_refs = kcalloc(gic_data.ppi_nr + SGI_NR,
+				 sizeof(*rdist_nmi_refs), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rdist_nmi_refs)
 		return;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < gic_data.ppi_nr; i++)
-		refcount_set(&ppi_nmi_refs[i], 0);
+	for (i = 0; i < gic_data.ppi_nr + SGI_NR; i++)
+		refcount_set(&rdist_nmi_refs[i], 0);
 
 	pr_info("Pseudo-NMIs enabled using %s ICC_PMR_EL1 synchronisation\n",
 		gic_has_relaxed_pmr_sync() ? "relaxed" : "forced");
@@ -2061,6 +2085,7 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(phys_addr_t dist_phys_base,
 
 	gic_dist_init();
 	gic_cpu_init();
+	gic_enable_nmi_support();
 	gic_smp_init();
 	gic_cpu_pm_init();
 
@@ -2073,8 +2098,6 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(phys_addr_t dist_phys_base,
 			gicv2m_init(handle, gic_data.domain);
 	}
 
-	gic_enable_nmi_support();
-
 	return 0;
 
 out_free:
-- 
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-06 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-06 16:02 [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02 ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02 ` Douglas Anderson [this message]
2023-09-06 16:02   ` [PATCH v13 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Douglas Anderson
2023-09-12 12:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-12 12:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 2/7] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 3/7] arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-26  0:39   ` Doug Anderson
2023-09-26  0:39     ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-02 16:48     ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-02 16:48       ` Doug Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 4/7] arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:03 ` [PATCH v13 5/7] arm64: smp: IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP should try for NMI Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:03   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:03 ` [PATCH v13 6/7] arm64: kgdb: Implement kgdb_roundup_cpus() to enable pseudo-NMI roundup Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:03   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:03 ` [PATCH v13 7/7] arm64: smp: Mark IPI globals as __ro_after_init Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:03   ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 21:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2023-09-06 21:45     ` Stephen Boyd
2023-09-25 17:10 ` [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Catalin Marinas
2023-09-25 17:10   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230906090246.v13.1.I1223c11c88937bd0cbd9b086d4ef216985797302@changeid \
    --to=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --cc=wenst@chromium.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.