All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>,
	Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/8] hugetlb: optimize update_and_free_pages_bulk to avoid lock cycles
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 16:01:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230918230202.254631-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230918230202.254631-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com>

update_and_free_pages_bulk is designed to free a list of hugetlb pages
back to their associated lower level allocators.  This may require
allocating vmemmmap pages associated with each hugetlb page.  The
hugetlb page destructor must be changed before pages are freed to lower
level allocators.  However, the destructor must be changed under the
hugetlb lock.  This means there is potentially one lock cycle per page.

Minimize the number of lock cycles in update_and_free_pages_bulk by:
1) allocating necessary vmemmap for all hugetlb pages on the list
2) take hugetlb lock and clear destructor for all pages on the list
3) free all pages on list back to low level allocators

Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index e2123d1bb4a2..1ca0377c62ab 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1837,7 +1837,46 @@ static void update_and_free_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h, struct folio *folio,
 static void update_and_free_pages_bulk(struct hstate *h, struct list_head *list)
 {
 	struct folio *folio, *t_folio;
+	bool clear_dtor = false;
 
+	/*
+	 * First allocate required vmemmmap (if necessary) for all folios on
+	 * list.  If vmemmap can not be allocated, we can not free folio to
+	 * lower level allocator, so add back as hugetlb surplus page.
+	 * add_hugetlb_folio() removes the page from THIS list.
+	 * Use clear_dtor to note if vmemmap was successfully allocated for
+	 * ANY page on the list.
+	 */
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, t_folio, list, lru) {
+		if (folio_test_hugetlb_vmemmap_optimized(folio)) {
+			if (hugetlb_vmemmap_restore(h, &folio->page)) {
+				spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
+				add_hugetlb_folio(h, folio, true);
+				spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
+			} else
+				clear_dtor = true;
+		}
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If vmemmmap allocation was performed on any folio above, take lock
+	 * to clear destructor of all folios on list.  This avoids the need to
+	 * lock/unlock for each individual folio.
+	 * The assumption is vmemmap allocation was performed on all or none
+	 * of the folios on the list.  This is true expect in VERY rare cases.
+	 */
+	if (clear_dtor) {
+		spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
+		list_for_each_entry(folio, list, lru)
+			__clear_hugetlb_destructor(h, folio);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Free folios back to low level allocators.  vmemmap and destructors
+	 * were taken care of above, so update_and_free_hugetlb_folio will
+	 * not need to take hugetlb lock.
+	 */
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, t_folio, list, lru) {
 		update_and_free_hugetlb_folio(h, folio, false);
 		cond_resched();
-- 
2.41.0


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-18 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-18 23:01 [PATCH v4 0/8] Batch hugetlb vmemmap modification operations Mike Kravetz
2023-09-18 23:01 ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2023-09-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] hugetlb: restructure pool allocations Mike Kravetz
2023-09-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] hugetlb: perform vmemmap optimization on a list of pages Mike Kravetz
2023-09-19  3:10   ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19 20:49     ` Mike Kravetz
2023-09-20  3:05       ` Muchun Song
2023-09-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] hugetlb: perform vmemmap restoration " Mike Kravetz
2023-09-19  9:52   ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19 20:57     ` Mike Kravetz
2023-09-20  2:56       ` Muchun Song
2023-09-20  3:03         ` Muchun Song
2023-09-21  1:12           ` Mike Kravetz
2023-09-21  9:31             ` Muchun Song
2023-09-21  9:47               ` Muchun Song
2023-09-21 21:58               ` Mike Kravetz
2023-09-22  8:19                 ` Muchun Song
2023-09-22 17:01                   ` Mike Kravetz
2023-09-22 17:28                     ` Mike Kravetz
2023-09-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] hugetlb: batch freeing of vmemmap pages Mike Kravetz
2023-09-19  6:09   ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19 21:32     ` Mike Kravetz
2023-09-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] hugetlb: batch PMD split for bulk vmemmap dedup Mike Kravetz
2023-09-19  6:27   ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19  8:18     ` Joao Martins
2023-09-19  6:42   ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19  8:26     ` Joao Martins
2023-09-19  8:41       ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19  8:55         ` Joao Martins
2023-09-19  8:57           ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19 15:09             ` Joao Martins
2023-09-20  2:47               ` Muchun Song
2023-09-20 10:39                 ` Joao Martins
2023-09-21  1:42                   ` Muchun Song
2023-09-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] hugetlb: batch TLB flushes when freeing vmemmap Mike Kravetz
2023-09-18 23:02 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] hugetlb: batch TLB flushes when restoring vmemmap Mike Kravetz
2023-09-19  6:48   ` Muchun Song
2023-09-19 21:53     ` Mike Kravetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230918230202.254631-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.