From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>, Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com> Cc: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mtk,scp: Add missing additionalProperties on child node schemas Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:45:08 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20230926164513.101958-1-robh@kernel.org> (raw) Just as unevaluatedProperties or additionalProperties are required at the top level of schemas, they should (and will) also be required for child node schemas. That ensures only documented properties are present for any node. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml index 895415772d1d..24422fd56e83 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ allOf: additionalProperties: type: object + additionalProperties: false description: Subnodes of the SCP represent rpmsg devices. The names of the devices are not important. The properties of these nodes are defined by the -- 2.40.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>, Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com> Cc: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mtk,scp: Add missing additionalProperties on child node schemas Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:45:08 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20230926164513.101958-1-robh@kernel.org> (raw) Just as unevaluatedProperties or additionalProperties are required at the top level of schemas, they should (and will) also be required for child node schemas. That ensures only documented properties are present for any node. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml index 895415772d1d..24422fd56e83 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ allOf: additionalProperties: type: object + additionalProperties: false description: Subnodes of the SCP represent rpmsg devices. The names of the devices are not important. The properties of these nodes are defined by the -- 2.40.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2023-09-26 16:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-09-26 16:45 Rob Herring [this message] 2023-09-26 16:45 ` [PATCH] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mtk,scp: Add missing additionalProperties on child node schemas Rob Herring 2023-09-27 12:25 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2023-09-27 12:25 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2023-09-27 15:12 ` Conor Dooley 2023-09-27 15:12 ` Conor Dooley 2023-09-28 19:31 ` Mathieu Poirier 2023-09-28 19:31 ` Mathieu Poirier 2023-09-28 20:51 ` Rob Herring 2023-09-28 20:51 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20230926164513.101958-1-robh@kernel.org \ --to=robh@kernel.org \ --cc=andersson@kernel.org \ --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \ --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \ --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \ --cc=tinghan.shen@mediatek.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.