All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 11/11] lib/kunit: Execute kunit test cases only when needed
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:17:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231011141734.590321-24-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231011141734.590321-13-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>

IGT user interface allows to request execution of only those dynamic sub-
subtests that match a user provided name pattern.  If the user pattern
doesn't match any names of test cases provided by a kunit test module used
with the subtest to be run then no results from any dynamic sub-subtests
will be reported.  Since we already know the list of test cases provided
by the kunit test module, there is no need to load that module to execute
them unless the user pattern matches at least one of those test cases.

Don't load the kunit test module in execute mode before entering the loop
of dynamic sub-subtests, and do that only from the first actually executed
dynamic sub-subtest.

v2: Always pass last result to next dynamic sub-subtest, fetch first
    result right after loading the kunit test module for execution.

Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>
---
 lib/igt_kmod.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/igt_kmod.c b/lib/igt_kmod.c
index c20c52d372..ca0356b1ca 100644
--- a/lib/igt_kmod.c
+++ b/lib/igt_kmod.c
@@ -1130,33 +1130,37 @@ static void __igt_kunit(struct igt_ktest *tst,
 
 	igt_skip_on(lseek(tst->kmsg, 0, SEEK_END) < 0);
 
-	igt_skip_on(pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr));
-	igt_skip_on(pthread_mutexattr_setrobust(&attr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST));
-	igt_skip_on(pthread_mutex_init(&modprobe.lock, &attr));
-
 	ktap = igt_ktap_alloc(&results);
 	igt_require(ktap);
 
-	if (igt_debug_on(pthread_create(&modprobe.thread, NULL,
-					modprobe_task, &modprobe))) {
-		igt_ktap_free(ktap);
-		igt_skip("Failed to create a modprobe thread\n");
-	}
-
 	igt_list_for_each_entry(t, tests, link) {
 		igt_dynamic_f("%s%s%s",
 			      strcmp(t->suite_name, name) ?  t->suite_name : "",
 			      strcmp(t->suite_name, name) ? "-" : "",
 			      t->case_name) {
 
-			if (igt_list_empty(&results)) {
+			if (!modprobe.thread) {
+				igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr), 0);
+				igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutexattr_setrobust(&attr,
+							  PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST),
+					      0);
+				igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_init(&modprobe.lock,
+								 &attr), 0);
+
+				modprobe.err = pthread_create(&modprobe.thread,
+							      NULL,
+							      modprobe_task,
+							      &modprobe);
+				igt_assert_eq(modprobe.err, 0);
+
+				igt_assert(igt_list_empty(&results));
 				igt_assert_eq(ret, -EINPROGRESS);
 				ret = kunit_kmsg_result_get(&results, &modprobe,
 							    tst->kmsg, ktap);
 				igt_fail_on(igt_list_empty(&results));
-			}
 
-			r = igt_list_first_entry(&results, r, link);
+				r = igt_list_first_entry(&results, r, link);
+			}
 
 			while (igt_debug_on_f(strcmp(r->suite_name, t->suite_name),
 					      "suite_name expected: %s, got: %s\n",
@@ -1228,30 +1232,30 @@ static void __igt_kunit(struct igt_ktest *tst,
 			igt_assert_eq(igt_kernel_tainted(&taints), 0);
 		}
 
-		kunit_result_free(&r, &suite_name, &case_name);
-
 		if (igt_debug_on(ret != -EINPROGRESS))
 			break;
 	}
 
 	kunit_results_free(&results, &suite_name, &case_name);
 
-	switch (pthread_mutex_lock(&modprobe.lock)) {
-	case 0:
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_cancel(modprobe.thread));
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_mutex_unlock(&modprobe.lock));
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_join(modprobe.thread, NULL));
-		break;
-	case EOWNERDEAD:
-		/* leave the mutex unrecoverable */
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_mutex_unlock(&modprobe.lock));
-		break;
-	case ENOTRECOVERABLE:
-		break;
-	default:
-		igt_debug("pthread_mutex_lock() failed\n");
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_join(modprobe.thread, NULL));
-		break;
+	if (modprobe.thread) {
+		switch (pthread_mutex_lock(&modprobe.lock)) {
+		case 0:
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_cancel(modprobe.thread));
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_mutex_unlock(&modprobe.lock));
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_join(modprobe.thread, NULL));
+			break;
+		case EOWNERDEAD:
+			/* leave the mutex unrecoverable */
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_mutex_unlock(&modprobe.lock));
+			break;
+		case ENOTRECOVERABLE:
+			break;
+		default:
+			igt_debug("pthread_mutex_lock() failed\n");
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_join(modprobe.thread, NULL));
+			break;
+		}
 	}
 
 	igt_ktap_free(ktap);
-- 
2.42.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>,
	Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH i-g-t v3 11/11] lib/kunit: Execute kunit test cases only when needed
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:17:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231011141734.590321-24-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231011141734.590321-13-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>

IGT user interface allows to request execution of only those dynamic sub-
subtests that match a user provided name pattern.  If the user pattern
doesn't match any names of test cases provided by a kunit test module used
with the subtest to be run then no results from any dynamic sub-subtests
will be reported.  Since we already know the list of test cases provided
by the kunit test module, there is no need to load that module to execute
them unless the user pattern matches at least one of those test cases.

Don't load the kunit test module in execute mode before entering the loop
of dynamic sub-subtests, and do that only from the first actually executed
dynamic sub-subtest.

v2: Always pass last result to next dynamic sub-subtest, fetch first
    result right after loading the kunit test module for execution.

Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>
---
 lib/igt_kmod.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/igt_kmod.c b/lib/igt_kmod.c
index c20c52d372..ca0356b1ca 100644
--- a/lib/igt_kmod.c
+++ b/lib/igt_kmod.c
@@ -1130,33 +1130,37 @@ static void __igt_kunit(struct igt_ktest *tst,
 
 	igt_skip_on(lseek(tst->kmsg, 0, SEEK_END) < 0);
 
-	igt_skip_on(pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr));
-	igt_skip_on(pthread_mutexattr_setrobust(&attr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST));
-	igt_skip_on(pthread_mutex_init(&modprobe.lock, &attr));
-
 	ktap = igt_ktap_alloc(&results);
 	igt_require(ktap);
 
-	if (igt_debug_on(pthread_create(&modprobe.thread, NULL,
-					modprobe_task, &modprobe))) {
-		igt_ktap_free(ktap);
-		igt_skip("Failed to create a modprobe thread\n");
-	}
-
 	igt_list_for_each_entry(t, tests, link) {
 		igt_dynamic_f("%s%s%s",
 			      strcmp(t->suite_name, name) ?  t->suite_name : "",
 			      strcmp(t->suite_name, name) ? "-" : "",
 			      t->case_name) {
 
-			if (igt_list_empty(&results)) {
+			if (!modprobe.thread) {
+				igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr), 0);
+				igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutexattr_setrobust(&attr,
+							  PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST),
+					      0);
+				igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_init(&modprobe.lock,
+								 &attr), 0);
+
+				modprobe.err = pthread_create(&modprobe.thread,
+							      NULL,
+							      modprobe_task,
+							      &modprobe);
+				igt_assert_eq(modprobe.err, 0);
+
+				igt_assert(igt_list_empty(&results));
 				igt_assert_eq(ret, -EINPROGRESS);
 				ret = kunit_kmsg_result_get(&results, &modprobe,
 							    tst->kmsg, ktap);
 				igt_fail_on(igt_list_empty(&results));
-			}
 
-			r = igt_list_first_entry(&results, r, link);
+				r = igt_list_first_entry(&results, r, link);
+			}
 
 			while (igt_debug_on_f(strcmp(r->suite_name, t->suite_name),
 					      "suite_name expected: %s, got: %s\n",
@@ -1228,30 +1232,30 @@ static void __igt_kunit(struct igt_ktest *tst,
 			igt_assert_eq(igt_kernel_tainted(&taints), 0);
 		}
 
-		kunit_result_free(&r, &suite_name, &case_name);
-
 		if (igt_debug_on(ret != -EINPROGRESS))
 			break;
 	}
 
 	kunit_results_free(&results, &suite_name, &case_name);
 
-	switch (pthread_mutex_lock(&modprobe.lock)) {
-	case 0:
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_cancel(modprobe.thread));
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_mutex_unlock(&modprobe.lock));
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_join(modprobe.thread, NULL));
-		break;
-	case EOWNERDEAD:
-		/* leave the mutex unrecoverable */
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_mutex_unlock(&modprobe.lock));
-		break;
-	case ENOTRECOVERABLE:
-		break;
-	default:
-		igt_debug("pthread_mutex_lock() failed\n");
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_join(modprobe.thread, NULL));
-		break;
+	if (modprobe.thread) {
+		switch (pthread_mutex_lock(&modprobe.lock)) {
+		case 0:
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_cancel(modprobe.thread));
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_mutex_unlock(&modprobe.lock));
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_join(modprobe.thread, NULL));
+			break;
+		case EOWNERDEAD:
+			/* leave the mutex unrecoverable */
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_mutex_unlock(&modprobe.lock));
+			break;
+		case ENOTRECOVERABLE:
+			break;
+		default:
+			igt_debug("pthread_mutex_lock() failed\n");
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_join(modprobe.thread, NULL));
+			break;
+		}
 	}
 
 	igt_ktap_free(ktap);
-- 
2.42.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 11/11] lib/kunit: Execute kunit test cases only when needed
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:17:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231011141734.590321-24-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231011141734.590321-13-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>

IGT user interface allows to request execution of only those dynamic sub-
subtests that match a user provided name pattern.  If the user pattern
doesn't match any names of test cases provided by a kunit test module used
with the subtest to be run then no results from any dynamic sub-subtests
will be reported.  Since we already know the list of test cases provided
by the kunit test module, there is no need to load that module to execute
them unless the user pattern matches at least one of those test cases.

Don't load the kunit test module in execute mode before entering the loop
of dynamic sub-subtests, and do that only from the first actually executed
dynamic sub-subtest.

v2: Always pass last result to next dynamic sub-subtest, fetch first
    result right after loading the kunit test module for execution.

Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>
---
 lib/igt_kmod.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/igt_kmod.c b/lib/igt_kmod.c
index c20c52d372..ca0356b1ca 100644
--- a/lib/igt_kmod.c
+++ b/lib/igt_kmod.c
@@ -1130,33 +1130,37 @@ static void __igt_kunit(struct igt_ktest *tst,
 
 	igt_skip_on(lseek(tst->kmsg, 0, SEEK_END) < 0);
 
-	igt_skip_on(pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr));
-	igt_skip_on(pthread_mutexattr_setrobust(&attr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST));
-	igt_skip_on(pthread_mutex_init(&modprobe.lock, &attr));
-
 	ktap = igt_ktap_alloc(&results);
 	igt_require(ktap);
 
-	if (igt_debug_on(pthread_create(&modprobe.thread, NULL,
-					modprobe_task, &modprobe))) {
-		igt_ktap_free(ktap);
-		igt_skip("Failed to create a modprobe thread\n");
-	}
-
 	igt_list_for_each_entry(t, tests, link) {
 		igt_dynamic_f("%s%s%s",
 			      strcmp(t->suite_name, name) ?  t->suite_name : "",
 			      strcmp(t->suite_name, name) ? "-" : "",
 			      t->case_name) {
 
-			if (igt_list_empty(&results)) {
+			if (!modprobe.thread) {
+				igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr), 0);
+				igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutexattr_setrobust(&attr,
+							  PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST),
+					      0);
+				igt_assert_eq(pthread_mutex_init(&modprobe.lock,
+								 &attr), 0);
+
+				modprobe.err = pthread_create(&modprobe.thread,
+							      NULL,
+							      modprobe_task,
+							      &modprobe);
+				igt_assert_eq(modprobe.err, 0);
+
+				igt_assert(igt_list_empty(&results));
 				igt_assert_eq(ret, -EINPROGRESS);
 				ret = kunit_kmsg_result_get(&results, &modprobe,
 							    tst->kmsg, ktap);
 				igt_fail_on(igt_list_empty(&results));
-			}
 
-			r = igt_list_first_entry(&results, r, link);
+				r = igt_list_first_entry(&results, r, link);
+			}
 
 			while (igt_debug_on_f(strcmp(r->suite_name, t->suite_name),
 					      "suite_name expected: %s, got: %s\n",
@@ -1228,30 +1232,30 @@ static void __igt_kunit(struct igt_ktest *tst,
 			igt_assert_eq(igt_kernel_tainted(&taints), 0);
 		}
 
-		kunit_result_free(&r, &suite_name, &case_name);
-
 		if (igt_debug_on(ret != -EINPROGRESS))
 			break;
 	}
 
 	kunit_results_free(&results, &suite_name, &case_name);
 
-	switch (pthread_mutex_lock(&modprobe.lock)) {
-	case 0:
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_cancel(modprobe.thread));
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_mutex_unlock(&modprobe.lock));
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_join(modprobe.thread, NULL));
-		break;
-	case EOWNERDEAD:
-		/* leave the mutex unrecoverable */
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_mutex_unlock(&modprobe.lock));
-		break;
-	case ENOTRECOVERABLE:
-		break;
-	default:
-		igt_debug("pthread_mutex_lock() failed\n");
-		igt_debug_on(pthread_join(modprobe.thread, NULL));
-		break;
+	if (modprobe.thread) {
+		switch (pthread_mutex_lock(&modprobe.lock)) {
+		case 0:
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_cancel(modprobe.thread));
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_mutex_unlock(&modprobe.lock));
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_join(modprobe.thread, NULL));
+			break;
+		case EOWNERDEAD:
+			/* leave the mutex unrecoverable */
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_mutex_unlock(&modprobe.lock));
+			break;
+		case ENOTRECOVERABLE:
+			break;
+		default:
+			igt_debug("pthread_mutex_lock() failed\n");
+			igt_debug_on(pthread_join(modprobe.thread, NULL));
+			break;
+		}
 	}
 
 	igt_ktap_free(ktap);
-- 
2.42.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-11 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-11 14:17 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 00/11] Kunit fixes and improvements Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17 ` [igt-dev] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17 ` [Intel-xe] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 01/11] lib/ktap: Improve TODO workaround description Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [igt-dev] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [Intel-xe] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-12  7:41   ` [Intel-gfx] " Kamil Konieczny
2023-10-12  7:41     ` [igt-dev] " Kamil Konieczny
2023-10-12  7:41     ` [Intel-xe] " Kamil Konieczny
2023-10-12 14:45   ` [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-10-12 14:45     ` [igt-dev] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-10-12 14:45     ` [Intel-xe] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-10-11 14:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 02/11] lib/kunit: Fix handling of potential errors from F_GETFL Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [igt-dev] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [Intel-xe] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-12 14:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-10-12 14:46     ` [igt-dev] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-10-12 14:46     ` [Intel-xe] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-10-11 14:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 03/11] lib/kunit: Be more verbose on errors Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [igt-dev] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [Intel-xe] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 04/11] lib/kunit: Fix misplaced igt_kunit() doc Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [igt-dev] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [Intel-xe] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-12 14:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-10-12 14:47     ` [igt-dev] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-10-12 14:47     ` [Intel-xe] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-10-11 14:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 05/11] lib/kunit: Parse KTAP report from the main process thread Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [igt-dev] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [Intel-xe] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-20 11:32   ` [Intel-gfx] " Kamil Konieczny
2023-10-20 11:32     ` [igt-dev] " Kamil Konieczny
2023-10-20 11:32     ` [Intel-xe] " Kamil Konieczny
2023-10-11 14:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 06/11] lib/kunit: Omit suite name prefix if the same as subtest name Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [igt-dev] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [Intel-xe] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 07/11] tests/kms_selftest: Let subtest names match suite names Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [igt-dev] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [Intel-xe] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 08/11] lib/kunit: Provide all results cleanup helper Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [igt-dev] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [Intel-xe] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 09/11] lib/kunit: Prepare for KTAP parsing after modprobe completed Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [igt-dev] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [Intel-xe] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 10/11] lib/kunit: Fetch a list of test cases in advance Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [igt-dev] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [Intel-xe] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-20 11:33   ` [Intel-gfx] " Kamil Konieczny
2023-10-20 11:33     ` [igt-dev] " Kamil Konieczny
2023-10-20 11:33     ` [Intel-xe] " Kamil Konieczny
2023-10-11 14:17 ` Janusz Krzysztofik [this message]
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 11/11] lib/kunit: Execute kunit test cases only when needed Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 14:17   ` [Intel-xe] " Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-11 19:26 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Kunit fixes and improvements (rev3) Patchwork
2023-10-12  1:00 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Kunit fixes and improvements (rev4) Patchwork
2023-10-12  1:21 ` [igt-dev] ✓ CI.xeBAT: " Patchwork
2023-10-12 17:59 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-10-13 12:59   ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-10-17  5:41 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231011141734.590321-24-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
    --to=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.