All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	Luo Yuzhang <yuzhang.luo@intel.com>,
	Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Fix incorrect cache invalidation for mm notification
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 17:09:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231117090933.75267-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)

Commit 6bbd42e2df8f ("mmu_notifiers: call invalidate_range() when
invalidating TLBs") moved the secondary TLB invalidations into the TLB
invalidation functions to ensure that all secondary TLB invalidations
happen at the same time as the CPU invalidation and added a flush-all
type of secondary TLB invalidation for the batched mode, where a range
of [0, -1UL) is used to indicates that the range extends to the end of
the address space.

However, using an end address of -1UL caused an overflow in the Intel
IOMMU driver, where the end address was rounded up to the next page.
As a result, both the IOTLB and device ATC were not invalidated correctly.

Add a flush all helper function and call it when the invalidation range
is from 0 to -1UL, ensuring that the entire caches are invalidated
correctly.

Fixes: 6bbd42e2df8f ("mmu_notifiers: call invalidate_range() when invalidating TLBs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Luo Yuzhang <yuzhang.luo@intel.com> # QAT
Tested-by: Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@intel.com> # DSA
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index 50a481c895b8..588385050a07 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -216,6 +216,27 @@ static void intel_flush_svm_range(struct intel_svm *svm, unsigned long address,
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
+static void intel_flush_svm_all(struct intel_svm *svm)
+{
+	struct device_domain_info *info;
+	struct intel_svm_dev *sdev;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(sdev, &svm->devs, list) {
+		info = dev_iommu_priv_get(sdev->dev);
+
+		qi_flush_piotlb(sdev->iommu, sdev->did, svm->pasid, 0, -1UL, 1);
+		if (info->ats_enabled) {
+			qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(sdev->iommu, sdev->sid, info->pfsid,
+						 svm->pasid, sdev->qdep,
+						 0, 64 - VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
+			quirk_extra_dev_tlb_flush(info, 0, 64 - VTD_PAGE_SHIFT,
+						  svm->pasid, sdev->qdep);
+		}
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
 /* Pages have been freed at this point */
 static void intel_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 					struct mm_struct *mm,
@@ -223,6 +244,11 @@ static void intel_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 {
 	struct intel_svm *svm = container_of(mn, struct intel_svm, notifier);
 
+	if (start == 0 && end == -1UL) {
+		intel_flush_svm_all(svm);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	intel_flush_svm_range(svm, start,
 			      (end - start + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT, 0);
 }
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-11-17  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-17  9:09 Lu Baolu [this message]
2023-11-17 13:11 ` [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Fix incorrect cache invalidation for mm notification Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-19 23:57 ` Alistair Popple
2023-11-20  2:55   ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-22  6:14     ` Alistair Popple
2023-11-20  3:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-11-20  4:17   ` Baolu Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231117090933.75267-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=yuzhang.luo@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.