All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>,
	Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] iomap: clear the per-folio dirty bits on all writeback failures
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 13:47:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231126124720.1249310-2-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231126124720.1249310-1-hch@lst.de>

write_cache_pages always clear the page dirty bit before calling into the
file systems, and leaves folios with a writeback failure without the
dirty bit after return.  We also clear the per-block writeback bits for
writeback failures unless no I/O has submitted, which will leave the
folio in an inconsistent state where it doesn't have the folio dirty,
but one or more per-block dirty bits.  This seems to be due the place
where the iomap_clear_range_dirty call was inserted into the existing
not very clearly structured code when adding per-block dirty bit support
and not actually intentional.  Switch to always clearing the dirty on
writeback failure.

Fixes: 4ce02c679722 ("iomap: Add per-block dirty state tracking to improve performance")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index f72df2babe561a..98d52feb220f0a 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -1849,10 +1849,6 @@ iomap_writepage_map(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc,
 		 */
 		if (wpc->ops->discard_folio)
 			wpc->ops->discard_folio(folio, pos);
-		if (!count) {
-			folio_unlock(folio);
-			goto done;
-		}
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -1861,6 +1857,12 @@ iomap_writepage_map(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc,
 	 * all the dirty bits in the folio here.
 	 */
 	iomap_clear_range_dirty(folio, 0, folio_size(folio));
+
+	if (error && !count) {
+		folio_unlock(folio);
+		goto done;
+	}
+
 	folio_start_writeback(folio);
 	folio_unlock(folio);
 
-- 
2.39.2


  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-26 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-26 12:47 RFC: map multiple blocks per ->map_blocks in iomap writeback Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-26 12:47 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-11-27  3:47   ` [PATCH 01/13] iomap: clear the per-folio dirty bits on all writeback failures Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-27  6:29     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-26 12:47 ` [PATCH 02/13] iomap: treat inline data in iomap_writepage_map as an I/O error Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-27  5:01   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-27  6:33     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  4:40       ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-29  5:39         ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-26 12:47 ` [PATCH 03/13] iomap: move the io_folios field out of struct iomap_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-27  5:33   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-29  4:41   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-26 12:47 ` [PATCH 04/13] iomap: drop the obsolete PF_MEMALLOC check in iomap_do_writepage Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-27  6:39   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-27  6:41     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  4:45       ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-26 12:47 ` [PATCH 05/13] iomap: factor out a iomap_writepage_handle_eof helper Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-27  6:57   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-27  7:02     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-27  7:12       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  4:48         ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-26 12:47 ` [PATCH 06/13] iomap: move all remaining per-folio logic into xfs_writepage_map Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-27  7:36   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-27 19:20   ` Josef Bacik
2023-11-29  4:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-26 12:47 ` [PATCH 07/13] iomap: clean up the iomap_new_ioend calling convention Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-27  7:43   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-27  8:13     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  4:51       ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-26 12:47 ` [PATCH 08/13] iomap: move the iomap_sector sector calculation out of iomap_add_to_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-27  9:54   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-11-27 13:54     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  4:53       ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-29  5:42         ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-26 12:47 ` [PATCH 09/13] iomap: don't chain bios Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-27 12:53   ` Zhang Yi
2023-11-27 13:51     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  4:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-29  5:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-26 12:47 ` [PATCH 10/13] iomap: only call mapping_set_error once for each failed bio Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  5:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-29  5:41     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-26 12:47 ` [PATCH 11/13] iomap: factor out a iomap_writepage_map_block helper Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  5:06   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-26 12:47 ` [PATCH 12/13] iomap: submit ioends immediately Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  5:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-26 12:47 ` [PATCH 13/13] iomap: map multiple blocks at a time Christoph Hellwig
2023-11-29  5:25   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-29  5:44     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231126124720.1249310-2-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.