All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, <jack@suse.cz>,
	<ritesh.list@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<djwong@kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	<yangerkun@huawei.com>, <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	<libaokun1@huawei.com>, <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: prevent the normalized size from exceeding EXT_MAX_BLOCKS
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 14:33:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231127063313.3734294-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> (raw)

For files with logical blocks close to EXT_MAX_BLOCKS, the file size
predicted in ext4_mb_normalize_request() may exceed EXT_MAX_BLOCKS.
This can cause some blocks to be preallocated that will not be used.
And after [Fixes], the following issue may be triggered:

=========================================================
 kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:4653!
 Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
 CPU: 1 PID: 2357 Comm: xfs_io 6.7.0-rc2-00195-g0f5cc96c367f
 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
 pc : ext4_mb_use_inode_pa+0x148/0x208
 lr : ext4_mb_use_inode_pa+0x98/0x208
 Call trace:
  ext4_mb_use_inode_pa+0x148/0x208
  ext4_mb_new_inode_pa+0x240/0x4a8
  ext4_mb_use_best_found+0x1d4/0x208
  ext4_mb_try_best_found+0xc8/0x110
  ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x11c/0xf48
  ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x790/0xaa8
  ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x7cc/0xd20
  ext4_map_blocks+0x170/0x600
  ext4_iomap_begin+0x1c0/0x348
=========================================================

Here is a calculation when adjusting ac_b_ex in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa():

	ex.fe_logical = orig_goal_end - EXT4_C2B(sbi, ex.fe_len);
	if (ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= ex.fe_logical)
		goto adjust_bex;

The problem is that when orig_goal_end is subtracted from ac_b_ex.fe_len
it is still greater than EXT_MAX_BLOCKS, which causes ex.fe_logical to
overflow to a very small value, which ultimately triggers a BUG_ON in
ext4_mb_new_inode_pa() because pa->pa_free < len.

The last logical block of an actual write request does not exceed
EXT_MAX_BLOCKS, so in ext4_mb_normalize_request() also avoids normalizing
the last logical block to exceed EXT_MAX_BLOCKS to avoid the above issue.

The test case in [Link] can reproduce the above issue with 64k block size.

Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/fstests/list/?series=804003
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 6.4
Fixes: 93cdf49f6eca ("ext4: Fix best extent lstart adjustment logic in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa()")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 454d5612641e..d72b5e3c92ec 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -4478,6 +4478,10 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 	start = max(start, rounddown(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical,
 			(ext4_lblk_t)EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(ac->ac_sb)));
 
+	/* avoid unnecessary preallocation that may trigger assertions */
+	if (start + size > EXT_MAX_BLOCKS)
+		size = EXT_MAX_BLOCKS - start;
+
 	/* don't cover already allocated blocks in selected range */
 	if (ar->pleft && start <= ar->lleft) {
 		size -= ar->lleft + 1 - start;
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-11-27  6:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-27  6:33 Baokun Li [this message]
2023-11-30 17:18 ` [PATCH] ext4: prevent the normalized size from exceeding EXT_MAX_BLOCKS Jan Kara
2023-12-01 14:46 ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231127063313.3734294-1-libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.