From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> To: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, "Luca Weiss" <luca@z3ntu.xyz>, "Matti Lehtimäki" <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the qcom tree with the arm-soc tree Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:08:48 +1100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20231204100848.141cfd29@canb.auug.org.au> (raw) [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1483 bytes --] Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the qcom tree got a conflict in: arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8974.dtsi between commit: 4960e06d386e ("ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974: sort nodes by reg") from the arm-soc tree and commit: 95053f6bc8ff ("ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974: Add watchdog node") from the qcom tree. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell diff --cc arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8974.dtsi index 76006c3c4af2,f7d7e5d70f30..000000000000 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8974.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8974.dtsi @@@ -346,12 -346,14 +346,20 @@@ reg = <0xf9011000 0x1000>; }; + saw_l2: power-controller@f9012000 { + compatible = "qcom,saw2"; + reg = <0xf9012000 0x1000>; + regulator; + }; + + watchdog@f9017000 { + compatible = "qcom,apss-wdt-msm8974", "qcom,kpss-wdt"; + reg = <0xf9017000 0x1000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, + <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + clocks = <&sleep_clk>; + }; + timer@f9020000 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> To: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, "Luca Weiss" <luca@z3ntu.xyz>, "Matti Lehtimäki" <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the qcom tree with the arm-soc tree Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:08:48 +1100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20231204100848.141cfd29@canb.auug.org.au> (raw) [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1483 bytes --] Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the qcom tree got a conflict in: arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8974.dtsi between commit: 4960e06d386e ("ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974: sort nodes by reg") from the arm-soc tree and commit: 95053f6bc8ff ("ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974: Add watchdog node") from the qcom tree. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell diff --cc arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8974.dtsi index 76006c3c4af2,f7d7e5d70f30..000000000000 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8974.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8974.dtsi @@@ -346,12 -346,14 +346,20 @@@ reg = <0xf9011000 0x1000>; }; + saw_l2: power-controller@f9012000 { + compatible = "qcom,saw2"; + reg = <0xf9012000 0x1000>; + regulator; + }; + + watchdog@f9017000 { + compatible = "qcom,apss-wdt-msm8974", "qcom,kpss-wdt"; + reg = <0xf9017000 0x1000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, + <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + clocks = <&sleep_clk>; + }; + timer@f9020000 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; [-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --] _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2023-12-03 23:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-12-03 23:08 Stephen Rothwell [this message] 2023-12-03 23:08 ` linux-next: manual merge of the qcom tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2023-12-03 23:03 Stephen Rothwell 2023-12-03 23:03 ` Stephen Rothwell 2019-11-04 22:39 Stephen Rothwell 2019-11-04 22:39 ` Stephen Rothwell 2015-10-11 23:19 Stephen Rothwell 2015-10-11 23:19 ` Stephen Rothwell 2015-10-11 23:19 ` Stephen Rothwell 2015-10-12 16:29 ` Andy Gross 2015-10-12 16:29 ` Andy Gross
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20231204100848.141cfd29@canb.auug.org.au \ --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \ --cc=agross@kernel.org \ --cc=andersson@kernel.org \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=luca@z3ntu.xyz \ --cc=matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com \ --cc=olof@lixom.net \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.