From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: meson: g12a-tohdmitx: Validate written enum values
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 18:34:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240103-meson-enum-val-v1-2-424af7a8fb91@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240103-meson-enum-val-v1-0-424af7a8fb91@kernel.org>
When writing to an enum we need to verify that the value written is valid
for the enumeration, the helper function snd_soc_item_enum_to_val() doesn't
do it since it needs to return an unsigned (and in any case we'd need to
check the return value).
Fixes: c8609f3870f7 ("ASoC: meson: add g12a tohdmitx control")
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c b/sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c
index f7ef9aa1eed8..51b7703e1834 100644
--- a/sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c
+++ b/sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ static int g12a_tohdmitx_i2s_mux_put_enum(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
unsigned int mux, changed;
+ if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->items)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
mux = snd_soc_enum_item_to_val(e, ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]);
changed = snd_soc_component_test_bits(component, e->reg,
CTRL0_I2S_DAT_SEL,
@@ -93,6 +96,9 @@ static int g12a_tohdmitx_spdif_mux_put_enum(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
unsigned int mux, changed;
+ if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->items)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
mux = snd_soc_enum_item_to_val(e, ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]);
changed = snd_soc_component_test_bits(component, TOHDMITX_CTRL0,
CTRL0_SPDIF_SEL,
--
2.39.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: meson: g12a-tohdmitx: Validate written enum values
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 18:34:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240103-meson-enum-val-v1-2-424af7a8fb91@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240103-meson-enum-val-v1-0-424af7a8fb91@kernel.org>
When writing to an enum we need to verify that the value written is valid
for the enumeration, the helper function snd_soc_item_enum_to_val() doesn't
do it since it needs to return an unsigned (and in any case we'd need to
check the return value).
Fixes: c8609f3870f7 ("ASoC: meson: add g12a tohdmitx control")
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c b/sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c
index f7ef9aa1eed8..51b7703e1834 100644
--- a/sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c
+++ b/sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ static int g12a_tohdmitx_i2s_mux_put_enum(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
unsigned int mux, changed;
+ if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->items)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
mux = snd_soc_enum_item_to_val(e, ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]);
changed = snd_soc_component_test_bits(component, e->reg,
CTRL0_I2S_DAT_SEL,
@@ -93,6 +96,9 @@ static int g12a_tohdmitx_spdif_mux_put_enum(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
unsigned int mux, changed;
+ if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->items)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
mux = snd_soc_enum_item_to_val(e, ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]);
changed = snd_soc_component_test_bits(component, TOHDMITX_CTRL0,
CTRL0_SPDIF_SEL,
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: meson: g12a-tohdmitx: Validate written enum values
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 18:34:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240103-meson-enum-val-v1-2-424af7a8fb91@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240103-meson-enum-val-v1-0-424af7a8fb91@kernel.org>
When writing to an enum we need to verify that the value written is valid
for the enumeration, the helper function snd_soc_item_enum_to_val() doesn't
do it since it needs to return an unsigned (and in any case we'd need to
check the return value).
Fixes: c8609f3870f7 ("ASoC: meson: add g12a tohdmitx control")
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c b/sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c
index f7ef9aa1eed8..51b7703e1834 100644
--- a/sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c
+++ b/sound/soc/meson/g12a-tohdmitx.c
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ static int g12a_tohdmitx_i2s_mux_put_enum(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
unsigned int mux, changed;
+ if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->items)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
mux = snd_soc_enum_item_to_val(e, ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]);
changed = snd_soc_component_test_bits(component, e->reg,
CTRL0_I2S_DAT_SEL,
@@ -93,6 +96,9 @@ static int g12a_tohdmitx_spdif_mux_put_enum(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct soc_enum *e = (struct soc_enum *)kcontrol->private_value;
unsigned int mux, changed;
+ if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] >= e->items)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
mux = snd_soc_enum_item_to_val(e, ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]);
changed = snd_soc_component_test_bits(component, TOHDMITX_CTRL0,
CTRL0_SPDIF_SEL,
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-03 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-03 18:34 [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: meson: Fix issues with LibreTech Saphire Mark Brown
2024-01-03 18:34 ` Mark Brown
2024-01-03 18:34 ` Mark Brown
2024-01-03 18:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: meson: g12a-toacodec: Validate written enum values Mark Brown
2024-01-03 18:34 ` Mark Brown
2024-01-03 18:34 ` Mark Brown
2024-01-03 18:34 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2024-01-03 18:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: meson: g12a-tohdmitx: " Mark Brown
2024-01-03 18:34 ` Mark Brown
2024-01-03 18:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: meson: g12a-toacodec: Fix event generation Mark Brown
2024-01-03 18:34 ` Mark Brown
2024-01-03 18:34 ` Mark Brown
2024-01-03 18:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: meson: g12a-tohdmitx: Fix event generation for S/PDIF mux Mark Brown
2024-01-03 18:34 ` Mark Brown
2024-01-03 18:34 ` Mark Brown
2024-01-03 20:24 ` [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: meson: Fix issues with LibreTech Saphire Mark Brown
2024-01-03 20:24 ` Mark Brown
2024-01-03 20:24 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240103-meson-enum-val-v1-2-424af7a8fb91@kernel.org \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.