[PATCH] fs: Wrong function name in comment

From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: Wrong function name in comment
Date: Mon,  8 Jan 2024 18:20:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240108172040.178173-1-agruenba@redhat.com> (raw)

This comment refers to function mark_buffer_inode_dirty(), but the
function is actually called mark_buffer_dirty_inode(), so fix the
comment.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
---
 fs/buffer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 967f34b70aa8..6bdca819033f 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mark_buffer_async_write);
  * a successful fsync().  For example, ext2 indirect blocks need to be
  * written back and waited upon before fsync() returns.
  *
- * The functions mark_buffer_inode_dirty(), fsync_inode_buffers(),
+ * The functions mark_buffer_dirty_inode(), fsync_inode_buffers(),
  * inode_has_buffers() and invalidate_inode_buffers() are provided for the
  * management of a list of dependent buffers at ->i_mapping->private_list.
  *
-- 
2.43.0

