All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH printk v4 04/14] printk: ringbuffer: Do not skip non-finalized records with prb_next_seq()
Date: Wed,  7 Feb 2024 14:46:53 +0106	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240207134103.1357162-5-john.ogness@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240207134103.1357162-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>

Commit f244b4dc53e5 ("printk: ringbuffer: Improve
prb_next_seq() performance") introduced an optimization for
prb_next_seq() by using best-effort to track recently finalized
records. However, the order of finalization does not
necessarily match the order of the records. The optimization
changed prb_next_seq() to return inconsistent results, possibly
yielding sequence numbers that are not available to readers
because they are preceded by non-finalized records or they are
not yet visible to the reader CPU.

Rather than simply best-effort tracking recently finalized
records, force the committing writer to read records and
increment the last "contiguous block" of finalized records. In
order to do this, the sequence number instead of ID must be
stored because ID's cannot be directly compared.

A new memory barrier pair is introduced to guarantee that a
reader can always read the records up until the sequence number
returned by prb_next_seq() (unless the records have since
been overwritten in the ringbuffer).

This restores the original functionality of prb_next_seq()
while also keeping the optimization.

For 32bit systems, only the lower 32 bits of the sequence
number are stored. When reading the value, it is expanded to
the full 64bit sequence number using the 32bit seq macros,
which fold in the value returned by prb_first_seq().

Fixes: f244b4dc53e5 ("printk: ringbuffer: Improve prb_next_seq() performance")
Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c | 164 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h |   4 +-
 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
index 49a82ccce8e9..04c26cca546f 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/bug.h>
 #include "printk_ringbuffer.h"
+#include "internal.h"
 
 /**
  * DOC: printk_ringbuffer overview
@@ -303,6 +304,9 @@
  *
  *   desc_push_tail:B / desc_reserve:D
  *     set descriptor reusable (state), then push descriptor tail (id)
+ *
+ *   desc_update_last_finalized:A / desc_last_finalized_seq:A
+ *     store finalized record, then set new highest finalized sequence number
  */
 
 #define DATA_SIZE(data_ring)		_DATA_SIZE((data_ring)->size_bits)
@@ -1441,20 +1445,118 @@ bool prb_reserve_in_last(struct prb_reserved_entry *e, struct printk_ringbuffer
 	return false;
 }
 
+/*
+ * @last_finalized_seq value guarantees that all records up to and including
+ * this sequence number are finalized and can be read. The only exception are
+ * too old records which have already been overwritten.
+ *
+ * It is also guaranteed that @last_finalized_seq only increases.
+ *
+ * Be aware that finalized records following non-finalized records are not
+ * reported because they are not yet available to the reader. For example,
+ * a new record stored via printk() will not be available to a printer if
+ * it follows a record that has not been finalized yet. However, once that
+ * non-finalized record becomes finalized, @last_finalized_seq will be
+ * appropriately updated and the full set of finalized records will be
+ * available to the printer. And since each printk() caller will either
+ * directly print or trigger deferred printing of all available unprinted
+ * records, all printk() messages will get printed.
+ */
+static u64 desc_last_finalized_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb)
+{
+	struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring = &rb->desc_ring;
+	unsigned long ulseq;
+
+	/*
+	 * Guarantee the sequence number is loaded before loading the
+	 * associated record in order to guarantee that the record can be
+	 * seen by this CPU. This pairs with desc_update_last_finalized:A.
+	 */
+	ulseq = atomic_long_read_acquire(&desc_ring->last_finalized_seq
+					); /* LMM(desc_last_finalized_seq:A) */
+
+	return __ulseq_to_u64seq(rb, ulseq);
+}
+
+static bool _prb_read_valid(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb, u64 *seq,
+			    struct printk_record *r, unsigned int *line_count);
+
+/*
+ * Check if there are records directly following @last_finalized_seq that are
+ * finalized. If so, update @last_finalized_seq to the latest of these
+ * records. It is not allowed to skip over records that are not yet finalized.
+ */
+static void desc_update_last_finalized(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb)
+{
+	struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring = &rb->desc_ring;
+	u64 old_seq = desc_last_finalized_seq(rb);
+	unsigned long oldval;
+	unsigned long newval;
+	u64 finalized_seq;
+	u64 try_seq;
+
+try_again:
+	finalized_seq = old_seq;
+	try_seq = finalized_seq + 1;
+
+	/* Try to find later finalized records. */
+	while (_prb_read_valid(rb, &try_seq, NULL, NULL)) {
+		finalized_seq = try_seq;
+		try_seq++;
+	}
+
+	/* No update needed if no later finalized record was found. */
+	if (finalized_seq == old_seq)
+		return;
+
+	oldval = __u64seq_to_ulseq(old_seq);
+	newval = __u64seq_to_ulseq(finalized_seq);
+
+	/*
+	 * Set the sequence number of a later finalized record that has been
+	 * seen.
+	 *
+	 * Guarantee the record data is visible to other CPUs before storing
+	 * its sequence number. This pairs with desc_last_finalized_seq:A.
+	 *
+	 * Memory barrier involvement:
+	 *
+	 * If desc_last_finalized_seq:A reads from
+	 * desc_update_last_finalized:A, then desc_read:A reads from
+	 * _prb_commit:B.
+	 *
+	 * Relies on:
+	 *
+	 * RELEASE from _prb_commit:B to desc_update_last_finalized:A
+	 *    matching
+	 * ACQUIRE from desc_last_finalized_seq:A to desc_read:A
+	 *
+	 * Note: _prb_commit:B and desc_update_last_finalized:A can be
+	 *       different CPUs. However, the desc_update_last_finalized:A
+	 *       CPU (which performs the release) must have previously seen
+	 *       _prb_commit:B.
+	 */
+	if (!atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_release(&desc_ring->last_finalized_seq,
+				&oldval, newval)) { /* LMM(desc_update_last_finalized:A) */
+		old_seq = __ulseq_to_u64seq(rb, oldval);
+		goto try_again;
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Attempt to finalize a specified descriptor. If this fails, the descriptor
  * is either already final or it will finalize itself when the writer commits.
  */
-static void desc_make_final(struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring, unsigned long id)
+static void desc_make_final(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb, unsigned long id)
 {
+	struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring = &rb->desc_ring;
 	unsigned long prev_state_val = DESC_SV(id, desc_committed);
 	struct prb_desc *d = to_desc(desc_ring, id);
 
-	atomic_long_cmpxchg_relaxed(&d->state_var, prev_state_val,
-			DESC_SV(id, desc_finalized)); /* LMM(desc_make_final:A) */
-
-	/* Best effort to remember the last finalized @id. */
-	atomic_long_set(&desc_ring->last_finalized_id, id);
+	if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&d->state_var, &prev_state_val,
+			DESC_SV(id, desc_finalized))) { /* LMM(desc_make_final:A) */
+		desc_update_last_finalized(rb);
+	}
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1550,7 +1652,7 @@ bool prb_reserve(struct prb_reserved_entry *e, struct printk_ringbuffer *rb,
 	 * readers. (For seq==0 there is no previous descriptor.)
 	 */
 	if (info->seq > 0)
-		desc_make_final(desc_ring, DESC_ID(id - 1));
+		desc_make_final(rb, DESC_ID(id - 1));
 
 	r->text_buf = data_alloc(rb, r->text_buf_size, &d->text_blk_lpos, id);
 	/* If text data allocation fails, a data-less record is committed. */
@@ -1643,7 +1745,7 @@ void prb_commit(struct prb_reserved_entry *e)
 	 */
 	head_id = atomic_long_read(&desc_ring->head_id); /* LMM(prb_commit:A) */
 	if (head_id != e->id)
-		desc_make_final(desc_ring, e->id);
+		desc_make_final(e->rb, e->id);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1663,12 +1765,9 @@ void prb_commit(struct prb_reserved_entry *e)
  */
 void prb_final_commit(struct prb_reserved_entry *e)
 {
-	struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring = &e->rb->desc_ring;
-
 	_prb_commit(e, desc_finalized);
 
-	/* Best effort to remember the last finalized @id. */
-	atomic_long_set(&desc_ring->last_finalized_id, e->id);
+	desc_update_last_finalized(e->rb);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2008,7 +2107,9 @@ u64 prb_first_valid_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb)
  * newest sequence number available to readers will be.
  *
  * This provides readers a sequence number to jump to if all currently
- * available records should be skipped.
+ * available records should be skipped. It is guaranteed that all records
+ * previous to the returned value have been finalized and are (or were)
+ * available to the reader.
  *
  * Context: Any context.
  * Return: The sequence number of the next newest (not yet available) record
@@ -2016,34 +2117,19 @@ u64 prb_first_valid_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb)
  */
 u64 prb_next_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb)
 {
-	struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring = &rb->desc_ring;
-	enum desc_state d_state;
-	unsigned long id;
 	u64 seq;
 
-	/* Check if the cached @id still points to a valid @seq. */
-	id = atomic_long_read(&desc_ring->last_finalized_id);
-	d_state = desc_read(desc_ring, id, NULL, &seq, NULL);
+	seq = desc_last_finalized_seq(rb);
 
-	if (d_state == desc_finalized || d_state == desc_reusable) {
-		/*
-		 * Begin searching after the last finalized record.
-		 *
-		 * On 0, the search must begin at 0 because of hack#2
-		 * of the bootstrapping phase it is not known if a
-		 * record at index 0 exists.
-		 */
-		if (seq != 0)
-			seq++;
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * The information about the last finalized sequence number
-		 * has gone. It should happen only when there is a flood of
-		 * new messages and the ringbuffer is rapidly recycled.
-		 * Give up and start from the beginning.
-		 */
-		seq = 0;
-	}
+	/*
+	 * Begin searching after the last finalized record.
+	 *
+	 * On 0, the search must begin at 0 because of hack#2
+	 * of the bootstrapping phase it is not known if a
+	 * record at index 0 exists.
+	 */
+	if (seq != 0)
+		seq++;
 
 	/*
 	 * The information about the last finalized @seq might be inaccurate.
@@ -2085,7 +2171,7 @@ void prb_init(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb,
 	rb->desc_ring.infos = infos;
 	atomic_long_set(&rb->desc_ring.head_id, DESC0_ID(descbits));
 	atomic_long_set(&rb->desc_ring.tail_id, DESC0_ID(descbits));
-	atomic_long_set(&rb->desc_ring.last_finalized_id, DESC0_ID(descbits));
+	atomic_long_set(&rb->desc_ring.last_finalized_seq, 0);
 
 	rb->text_data_ring.size_bits = textbits;
 	rb->text_data_ring.data = text_buf;
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
index ee294aaf4aeb..2d948cc82b5b 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct prb_desc_ring {
 	struct printk_info	*infos;
 	atomic_long_t		head_id;
 	atomic_long_t		tail_id;
-	atomic_long_t		last_finalized_id;
+	atomic_long_t		last_finalized_seq;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static struct printk_ringbuffer name = {							\
 		.infos		= &_##name##_infos[0],						\
 		.head_id	= ATOMIC_INIT(DESC0_ID(descbits)),				\
 		.tail_id	= ATOMIC_INIT(DESC0_ID(descbits)),				\
-		.last_finalized_id = ATOMIC_INIT(DESC0_ID(descbits)),				\
+		.last_finalized_seq = ATOMIC_INIT(0),						\
 	},											\
 	.text_data_ring = {									\
 		.size_bits	= (avgtextbits) + (descbits),					\
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-07 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-07 13:40 [PATCH printk v4 00/14] fix console flushing John Ogness
2024-02-07 13:40 ` [PATCH printk v4 01/14] printk: nbcon: Relocate 32bit seq macros John Ogness
2024-02-07 13:40 ` [PATCH printk v4 02/14] printk: Adjust mapping for " John Ogness
2024-02-07 13:40 ` [PATCH printk v4 03/14] printk: Use prb_first_seq() as base " John Ogness
2024-02-07 13:40 ` John Ogness [this message]
2024-02-07 16:00   ` [PATCH printk v4 04/14] printk: ringbuffer: Do not skip non-finalized records with prb_next_seq() Petr Mladek
2024-02-07 13:40 ` [PATCH printk v4 05/14] printk: ringbuffer: Clarify special lpos values John Ogness
2024-02-07 13:40 ` [PATCH printk v4 06/14] printk: For @suppress_panic_printk check for other CPU in panic John Ogness
2024-02-07 13:40 ` [PATCH printk v4 07/14] printk: Add this_cpu_in_panic() John Ogness
2024-02-07 13:40 ` [PATCH printk v4 08/14] printk: ringbuffer: Cleanup reader terminology John Ogness
2024-02-07 13:40 ` [PATCH printk v4 09/14] printk: Wait for all reserved records with pr_flush() John Ogness
2024-02-07 13:40 ` [PATCH printk v4 10/14] printk: ringbuffer: Skip non-finalized records in panic John Ogness
2024-02-07 13:41 ` [PATCH printk v4 11/14] printk: Disable passing console lock owner completely during panic() John Ogness
2024-02-07 13:41 ` [PATCH printk v4 12/14] printk: Avoid non-panic CPUs writing to ringbuffer John Ogness
2024-02-07 13:41 ` [PATCH printk v4 13/14] panic: Flush kernel log buffer at the end John Ogness
2024-02-07 13:41 ` [PATCH printk v4 14/14] dump_stack: Do not get cpu_sync for panic CPU John Ogness
2024-02-07 16:16   ` Petr Mladek
2024-02-07 16:18 ` [PATCH printk v4 00/14] fix console flushing Petr Mladek
2024-02-07 16:53   ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240207134103.1357162-5-john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.