All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/15] clk: samsung: Pass mask to wait_until_mux_stable()
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:02:31 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222030235.27815-12-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222030235.27815-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org>

Make it possible to use wait_until_mux_stable() for MUX registers where
the mask is different from MUX_MASK (e.g. in upcoming CPU clock
implementation for Exynos850).

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
---
Changes in v2:
  - none

 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c
index 93e961855875..89b24fd5d0a9 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c
@@ -135,16 +135,16 @@ static void wait_until_divider_stable(void __iomem *div_reg, unsigned long mask)
  * value was changed.
  */
 static void wait_until_mux_stable(void __iomem *mux_reg, u32 mux_pos,
-				  unsigned long mux_value)
+				  unsigned long mask, unsigned long mux_value)
 {
 	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MAX_STAB_TIME);
 
 	do {
-		if (((readl(mux_reg) >> mux_pos) & MUX_MASK) == mux_value)
+		if (((readl(mux_reg) >> mux_pos) & mask) == mux_value)
 			return;
 	} while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
 
-	if (((readl(mux_reg) >> mux_pos) & MUX_MASK) == mux_value)
+	if (((readl(mux_reg) >> mux_pos) & mask) == mux_value)
 		return;
 
 	pr_err("%s: re-parenting mux timed-out\n", __func__);
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int exynos_cpuclk_pre_rate_change(struct clk_notifier_data *ndata,
 	/* select sclk_mpll as the alternate parent */
 	mux_reg = readl(base + regs->mux_sel);
 	writel(mux_reg | (1 << 16), base + regs->mux_sel);
-	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 16, 2);
+	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 16, MUX_MASK, 2);
 
 	/* alternate parent is active now. set the dividers */
 	writel(div0, base + regs->div_cpu0);
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static int exynos_cpuclk_post_rate_change(struct clk_notifier_data *ndata,
 	/* select mout_apll as the alternate parent */
 	mux_reg = readl(base + regs->mux_sel);
 	writel(mux_reg & ~(1 << 16), base + regs->mux_sel);
-	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 16, 1);
+	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 16, MUX_MASK, 1);
 
 	if (cpuclk->flags & CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV) {
 		div |= (cfg_data->div0 & E4210_DIV0_ATB_MASK);
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static int exynos5433_cpuclk_pre_rate_change(struct clk_notifier_data *ndata,
 	/* select the alternate parent */
 	mux_reg = readl(base + regs->mux_sel);
 	writel(mux_reg | 1, base + regs->mux_sel);
-	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 0, 2);
+	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 0, MUX_MASK, 2);
 
 	/* alternate parent is active now. set the dividers */
 	writel(div0, base + regs->div_cpu0);
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static int exynos5433_cpuclk_post_rate_change(struct clk_notifier_data *ndata,
 	/* select apll as the alternate parent */
 	mux_reg = readl(base + regs->mux_sel);
 	writel(mux_reg & ~1, base + regs->mux_sel);
-	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 0, 1);
+	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 0, MUX_MASK, 1);
 
 	exynos_set_safe_div(cpuclk, div, div_mask);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(cpuclk->lock, flags);
-- 
2.39.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/15] clk: samsung: Pass mask to wait_until_mux_stable()
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:02:31 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222030235.27815-12-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222030235.27815-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org>

Make it possible to use wait_until_mux_stable() for MUX registers where
the mask is different from MUX_MASK (e.g. in upcoming CPU clock
implementation for Exynos850).

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
---
Changes in v2:
  - none

 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c
index 93e961855875..89b24fd5d0a9 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c
@@ -135,16 +135,16 @@ static void wait_until_divider_stable(void __iomem *div_reg, unsigned long mask)
  * value was changed.
  */
 static void wait_until_mux_stable(void __iomem *mux_reg, u32 mux_pos,
-				  unsigned long mux_value)
+				  unsigned long mask, unsigned long mux_value)
 {
 	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MAX_STAB_TIME);
 
 	do {
-		if (((readl(mux_reg) >> mux_pos) & MUX_MASK) == mux_value)
+		if (((readl(mux_reg) >> mux_pos) & mask) == mux_value)
 			return;
 	} while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
 
-	if (((readl(mux_reg) >> mux_pos) & MUX_MASK) == mux_value)
+	if (((readl(mux_reg) >> mux_pos) & mask) == mux_value)
 		return;
 
 	pr_err("%s: re-parenting mux timed-out\n", __func__);
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int exynos_cpuclk_pre_rate_change(struct clk_notifier_data *ndata,
 	/* select sclk_mpll as the alternate parent */
 	mux_reg = readl(base + regs->mux_sel);
 	writel(mux_reg | (1 << 16), base + regs->mux_sel);
-	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 16, 2);
+	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 16, MUX_MASK, 2);
 
 	/* alternate parent is active now. set the dividers */
 	writel(div0, base + regs->div_cpu0);
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static int exynos_cpuclk_post_rate_change(struct clk_notifier_data *ndata,
 	/* select mout_apll as the alternate parent */
 	mux_reg = readl(base + regs->mux_sel);
 	writel(mux_reg & ~(1 << 16), base + regs->mux_sel);
-	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 16, 1);
+	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 16, MUX_MASK, 1);
 
 	if (cpuclk->flags & CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV) {
 		div |= (cfg_data->div0 & E4210_DIV0_ATB_MASK);
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static int exynos5433_cpuclk_pre_rate_change(struct clk_notifier_data *ndata,
 	/* select the alternate parent */
 	mux_reg = readl(base + regs->mux_sel);
 	writel(mux_reg | 1, base + regs->mux_sel);
-	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 0, 2);
+	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 0, MUX_MASK, 2);
 
 	/* alternate parent is active now. set the dividers */
 	writel(div0, base + regs->div_cpu0);
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static int exynos5433_cpuclk_post_rate_change(struct clk_notifier_data *ndata,
 	/* select apll as the alternate parent */
 	mux_reg = readl(base + regs->mux_sel);
 	writel(mux_reg & ~1, base + regs->mux_sel);
-	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 0, 1);
+	wait_until_mux_stable(base + regs->mux_stat, 0, MUX_MASK, 1);
 
 	exynos_set_safe_div(cpuclk, div, div_mask);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(cpuclk->lock, flags);
-- 
2.39.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-22  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-22  3:02 [PATCH v2 00/15] clk: samsung: Add CPU clocks for Exynos850 Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] dt-bindings: clock: exynos850: Add CMU_CPUCLK0 and CMU_CPUCL1 Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] clk: samsung: Improve clk-cpu.c style Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] clk: samsung: Pull struct exynos_cpuclk into clk-cpu.c Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] clk: samsung: Reduce params count in exynos_register_cpu_clock() Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] clk: samsung: Use single CPU clock notifier callback for all chips Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] clk: samsung: Group CPU clock functions by chip Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] clk: samsung: Pass actual CPU clock registers base to CPU_CLK() Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] clk: samsung: Pass register layout type explicitly to CLK_CPU() Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] clk: samsung: Keep CPU clock chip specific data in a dedicated struct Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] clk: samsung: Keep register offsets in chip specific structure Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` Sam Protsenko [this message]
2024-02-22  3:02   ` [PATCH v2 11/15] clk: samsung: Pass mask to wait_until_mux_stable() Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] clk: samsung: Add CPU clock support for Exynos850 Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] clk: samsung: Implement manual PLL control for ARM64 SoCs Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] clk: samsung: exynos850: Add CMU_CPUCL0 and CMU_CPUCL1 Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] arm64: dts: exynos: Add CPU clocks for Exynos850 Sam Protsenko
2024-02-22  3:02   ` Sam Protsenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240222030235.27815-12-semen.protsenko@linaro.org \
    --to=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.