[PATCH v2 07/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Honor HFGITR_EL2.ERET being set

From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/13] KVM: arm64: nv: Honor HFGITR_EL2.ERET being set
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 10:05:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240226100601.2379693-8-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240226100601.2379693-1-maz@kernel.org>

If the L1 hypervisor decides to trap ERETs while running L2,
make sure we don't try to emulate it, just like we wouldn't
if it had its NV bit set.

The exception will be reinjected from the core handler.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
index eaf242b8e0cf..3ea9bdf6b555 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
@@ -220,7 +220,8 @@ static bool kvm_hyp_handle_eret(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
 	 * Unless the trap has to be forwarded further down the line,
 	 * of course...
 	 */
-	if (__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, HCR_EL2) & HCR_NV)
+	if ((__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, HCR_EL2) & HCR_NV) ||
+	    (__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, HFGITR_EL2) & HFGITR_EL2_ERET))
 		return false;
 
 	spsr = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SPSR);
-- 
2.39.2

