All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Alan Maguire" <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"James Morris" <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	"Madhavan T . Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Marco Pagani" <marpagan@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Thara Gopinath" <tgopinath@microsoft.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"Wanpeng Li" <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	"Zahra Tarkhani" <ztarkhani@microsoft.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 8/8] kunit: Add tests for faults
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:04:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240229170409.365386-9-mic@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229170409.365386-1-mic@digikod.net>

The first test checks NULL pointer dereference and make sure it would
result as a failed test.

The second and third tests check that read-only data is indeed read-only
and trying to modify it would result as a failed test.

This kunit_x86_fault test suite is marked as skipped when run on a
non-x86 native architecture.  It is then skipped on UML because such
test would result to a kernel panic.

Tested with:
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64 kunit_x86_fault

Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
---
 lib/kunit/kunit-test.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
index f7980ef236a3..57d8eff00c66 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <kunit/test-bug.h>
 
 #include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
 #include <kunit/device.h>
 
 #include "string-stream.h"
@@ -109,6 +110,117 @@ static struct kunit_suite kunit_try_catch_test_suite = {
 	.test_cases = kunit_try_catch_test_cases,
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+
+static void kunit_test_null_dereference(void *data)
+{
+	struct kunit *test = data;
+	int *null = NULL;
+
+	*null = 0;
+
+	KUNIT_FAIL(test, "This line should never be reached\n");
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_fault_null_dereference(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch = ctx->try_catch;
+
+	kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch,
+			     test,
+			     kunit_test_null_dereference,
+			     kunit_test_catch);
+	kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, test);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, try_catch->try_result, -EINTR);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, ctx->function_called);
+}
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX) || defined(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX)
+
+const int test_const = 1;
+
+static void kunit_test_const(void *data)
+{
+	struct kunit *test = data;
+	/* Bypasses compiler check. */
+	int *ptr = (int *)&test_const;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_const, 1);
+	*ptr = 2;
+
+	KUNIT_FAIL(test, "This line should never be reached\n");
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_fault_const(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch = ctx->try_catch;
+
+	kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch, test, kunit_test_const,
+			     kunit_test_catch);
+	kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, test);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_const, 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, try_catch->try_result, -EINTR);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, ctx->function_called);
+}
+
+static int test_rodata __ro_after_init = 1;
+
+static void kunit_test_rodata(void *data)
+{
+	struct kunit *test = data;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_rodata, 1);
+	test_rodata = 2;
+
+	KUNIT_FAIL(test, "This line should never be reached\n");
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_fault_rodata(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch = ctx->try_catch;
+
+	if (!rodata_enabled)
+		kunit_skip(test, "Strict RWX is not enabled");
+
+	kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch, test, kunit_test_rodata,
+			     kunit_test_catch);
+	kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, test);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_rodata, 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, try_catch->try_result, -EINTR);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, ctx->function_called);
+}
+
+#else /* defined(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX) || defined(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX) */
+
+static void kunit_test_fault_rodata(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	kunit_skip(test, "Strict RWX is not supported");
+}
+
+#endif /* defined(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX) || defined(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX) */
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
+
+static struct kunit_case kunit_x86_fault_test_cases[] = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_fault_null_dereference),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_fault_const),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_fault_rodata),
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite kunit_x86_fault_test_suite = {
+	.name = "kunit_x86_fault",
+	.init = kunit_try_catch_test_init,
+	.test_cases = kunit_x86_fault_test_cases,
+};
+
 /*
  * Context for testing test managed resources
  * is_resource_initialized is used to test arbitrary resources
@@ -826,6 +938,7 @@ static struct kunit_suite kunit_current_test_suite = {
 
 kunit_test_suites(&kunit_try_catch_test_suite, &kunit_resource_test_suite,
 		  &kunit_log_test_suite, &kunit_status_test_suite,
-		  &kunit_current_test_suite, &kunit_device_test_suite);
+		  &kunit_current_test_suite, &kunit_device_test_suite,
+		  &kunit_x86_fault_test_suite);
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
2.44.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-29 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-29 17:04 [PATCH v1 0/8] Run KUnit tests late and handle faults Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] kunit: Run tests when the kernel is fully setup Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:21   ` Kees Cook
2024-03-01  5:29   ` kernel test robot
2024-03-01  7:14   ` David Gow
2024-03-01 19:03     ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-03-01 11:03   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] kunit: Handle thread creation error Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:21   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] kunit: Fix kthread reference Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:22   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] kunit: Fix timeout message Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:22   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] kunit: Handle test faults Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:24   ` Kees Cook
2024-03-01 19:09     ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] kunit: Fix KUNIT_SUCCESS() calls in iov_iter tests Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:24   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-29 17:04 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] kunit: Print last test location on fault Mickaël Salaün
2024-02-29 18:26   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-29 17:04 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2024-02-29 18:28   ` [PATCH v1 8/8] kunit: Add tests for faults Kees Cook
2024-03-01 19:16     ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-03-01 20:42   ` kernel test robot
2024-03-01  7:15 ` [PATCH v1 0/8] Run KUnit tests late and handle faults David Gow
2024-03-01  7:15   ` David Gow
2024-03-01 19:19   ` Mickaël Salaün

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240229170409.365386-9-mic@digikod.net \
    --to=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=marpagan@redhat.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tgopinath@microsoft.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ztarkhani@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.