All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Andi Shyti" <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>,
	"Andrzej Hajda" <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	"Nirmoy Das" <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
	"Jonathan Cavitt" <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	"Niranjana Vishwanathapura" <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>,
	"Janusz Krzysztofik" <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/3] drm/i915/vma: Fix UAF on destroy against retire race
Date: Tue,  5 Mar 2024 15:35:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240305143747.335367-6-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240305143747.335367-5-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>

Object debugging tools were sporadically reporting illegal attempts to
free a still active i915 VMA object when parking a GT believed to be idle.

[161.359441] ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object: ffff88811643b958 object type: i915_active hint: __i915_vma_active+0x0/0x50 [i915]
[161.360082] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 276 at lib/debugobjects.c:514 debug_print_object+0x80/0xb0
...
[161.360304] CPU: 5 PID: 276 Comm: kworker/5:2 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1-CI_DRM_13375-g003f860e5577+ #1
[161.360314] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Rocket Lake Client Platform/RocketLake S UDIMM 6L RVP, BIOS RKLSFWI1.R00.3173.A03.2204210138 04/21/2022
[161.360322] Workqueue: i915-unordered __intel_wakeref_put_work [i915]
[161.360592] RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x80/0xb0
...
[161.361347] debug_object_free+0xeb/0x110
[161.361362] i915_active_fini+0x14/0x130 [i915]
[161.361866] release_references+0xfe/0x1f0 [i915]
[161.362543] i915_vma_parked+0x1db/0x380 [i915]
[161.363129] __gt_park+0x121/0x230 [i915]
[161.363515] ____intel_wakeref_put_last+0x1f/0x70 [i915]

That has been tracked down to be happening when another thread is
deactivating the VMA inside __active_retire() helper, after the VMA's
active counter has been already decremented to 0, but before deactivation
of the VMA's object is reported to the object debugging tool.

We could prevent from that race by serializing i915_active_fini() with
__active_retire() via ref->tree_lock, but that wouldn't stop the VMA from
being used, e.g. from __i915_vma_retire() called at the end of
__active_retire(), after that VMA has been already freed by a concurrent
i915_vma_destroy() on return from the i915_active_fini().  Then, we should
rather fix the issue at the VMA level, not in i915_active.

Since __i915_vma_parked() is called from __gt_park() on last put of the
GT's wakeref, the issue could be addressed by holding the GT wakeref long
enough for __active_retire() to complete before that wakeref is released
and the GT parked.

I believe the issue was introduced by commit d93939730347 ("drm/i915:
Remove the vma refcount") which moved a call to i915_active_fini() from
a dropped i915_vma_release(), called on last put of the removed VMA kref,
to i915_vma_parked() processing path called on last put of a GT wakeref.
However, its visibility to the object debugging tool was suppressed by a
bug in i915_active that was fixed two weeks later with commit e92eb246feb9
("drm/i915/active: Fix missing debug object activation").

A VMA associated with a request doesn't acquire a GT wakeref by itself.
Instead, it depends on a wakeref held directly by the request's active
intel_context for a GT associated with its VM, and indirectly on that
intel_context's engine wakeref if the engine belongs to the same GT as the
VMA's VM.  Those wakerefs are released asynchronously to VMA deactivation.

Fix the issue by getting a wakeref for the VMA's GT when activating it,
and putting that wakeref only after the VMA is deactivated.  However,
exclude global GTT from that processing path, otherwise the GPU never goes
idle.  Since __i915_vma_retire() may be called from atomic contexts, use
async variant of wakeref put.  Also, to avoid circular locking dependency,
take care of acquiring the wakeref before VM mutex when both are needed.

v7: Add inline comments with justifications for:
    - using untracked variants of intel_gt_pm_get/put() (Nirmoy),
    - using async variant of _put(),
    - not getting the wakeref in case of a global GTT,
    - always getting the first wakeref outside vm->mutex.
v6: Since __i915_vma_active/retire() callbacks are not serialized, storing
    a wakeref tracking handle inside struct i915_vma is not safe, and
    there is no other good place for that.  Use untracked variants of
    intel_gt_pm_get/put_async().
v5: Replace "tile" with "GT" across commit description (Rodrigo),
  - avoid mentioning multi-GT case in commit description (Rodrigo),
  - explain why we need to take a temporary wakeref unconditionally inside
    i915_vma_pin_ww() (Rodrigo).
v4: Refresh on top of commit 5e4e06e4087e ("drm/i915: Track gt pm
    wakerefs") (Andi),
  - for more easy backporting, split out removal of former insufficient
    workarounds and move them to separate patches (Nirmoy).
  - clean up commit message and description a bit.
v3: Identify root cause more precisely, and a commit to blame,
  - identify and drop former workarounds,
  - update commit message and description.
v2: Get the wakeref before VM mutex to avoid circular locking dependency,
  - drop questionable Fixes: tag.

Fixes: d93939730347 ("drm/i915: Remove the vma refcount")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8875
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.19+
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
index d09aad34ba37f..b70715b1411d6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 #include "gt/intel_engine.h"
 #include "gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.h"
 #include "gt/intel_gt.h"
+#include "gt/intel_gt_pm.h"
 #include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
 #include "gt/intel_tlb.h"
 
@@ -103,12 +104,42 @@ static inline struct i915_vma *active_to_vma(struct i915_active *ref)
 
 static int __i915_vma_active(struct i915_active *ref)
 {
-	return i915_vma_tryget(active_to_vma(ref)) ? 0 : -ENOENT;
+	struct i915_vma *vma = active_to_vma(ref);
+
+	if (!i915_vma_tryget(vma))
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	/*
+	 * Exclude global GTT VMA from holding a GT wakeref
+	 * while active, otherwise GPU never goes idle.
+	 */
+	if (!i915_vma_is_ggtt(vma)) {
+		/*
+		 * Since we and our _retire() counterpart can be
+		 * called asynchronously, storing a wakeref tracking
+		 * handle inside struct i915_vma is not safe, and
+		 * there is no other good place for that.  Hence,
+		 * use untracked variants of intel_gt_pm_get/put().
+		 */
+		intel_gt_pm_get_untracked(vma->vm->gt);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void __i915_vma_retire(struct i915_active *ref)
 {
-	i915_vma_put(active_to_vma(ref));
+	struct i915_vma *vma = active_to_vma(ref);
+
+	if (!i915_vma_is_ggtt(vma)) {
+		/*
+		 * Since we can be called from atomic contexts,
+		 * use an async variant of intel_gt_pm_put().
+		 */
+		intel_gt_pm_put_async_untracked(vma->vm->gt);
+	}
+
+	i915_vma_put(vma);
 }
 
 static struct i915_vma *
@@ -1404,7 +1435,7 @@ int i915_vma_pin_ww(struct i915_vma *vma, struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 	struct i915_vma_work *work = NULL;
 	struct dma_fence *moving = NULL;
 	struct i915_vma_resource *vma_res = NULL;
-	intel_wakeref_t wakeref = 0;
+	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
 	unsigned int bound;
 	int err;
 
@@ -1424,8 +1455,14 @@ int i915_vma_pin_ww(struct i915_vma *vma, struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	if (flags & PIN_GLOBAL)
-		wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&vma->vm->i915->runtime_pm);
+	/*
+	 * In case of a global GTT, we must hold a runtime-pm wakeref
+	 * while global PTEs are updated.  In other cases, we hold
+	 * the rpm reference while the VMA is active.  Since runtime
+	 * resume may require allocations, which are forbidden inside
+	 * vm->mutex, get the first rpm wakeref outside of the mutex.
+	 */
+	wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&vma->vm->i915->runtime_pm);
 
 	if (flags & vma->vm->bind_async_flags) {
 		/* lock VM */
@@ -1561,8 +1598,7 @@ int i915_vma_pin_ww(struct i915_vma *vma, struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 	if (work)
 		dma_fence_work_commit_imm(&work->base);
 err_rpm:
-	if (wakeref)
-		intel_runtime_pm_put(&vma->vm->i915->runtime_pm, wakeref);
+	intel_runtime_pm_put(&vma->vm->i915->runtime_pm, wakeref);
 
 	if (moving)
 		dma_fence_put(moving);
-- 
2.43.0


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-05 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-05 14:35 [PATCH v7 0/3] drm/i915: Fix VMA UAF on destroy against deactivate race Janusz Krzysztofik
2024-03-05 14:35 ` Janusz Krzysztofik [this message]
2024-03-05 14:59   ` [PATCH v7 1/3] drm/i915/vma: Fix UAF on destroy against retire race Nirmoy Das
2024-03-05 14:35 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] drm/i915: Remove extra multi-gt pm-references Janusz Krzysztofik
2024-03-05 15:00   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-03-05 14:35 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] Revert "drm/i915: Wait for active retire before i915_active_fini()" Janusz Krzysztofik
2024-03-05 14:59   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-03-06  1:03 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Fix VMA UAF on destroy against deactivate race (rev5) Patchwork
2024-03-06  1:22 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-03-06 20:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Fix VMA UAF on destroy against deactivate race (rev6) Patchwork
2024-03-06 21:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-03-07 22:44 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Fix VMA UAF on destroy against deactivate race (rev7) Patchwork
2024-03-07 22:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-03-08  9:57 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-03-14 12:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Fix VMA UAF on destroy against deactivate race (rev8) Patchwork
2024-03-14 13:09 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-03-15 11:06 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-03-26 11:16 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] drm/i915: Fix VMA UAF on destroy against deactivate race Andi Shyti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240305143747.335367-6-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
    --to=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.