All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>
To: Frank.li@nxp.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com,
	john.g.garry@oracle.com, jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
	irogers@google.com
Cc: mike.leach@linaro.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	adrian.hunter@intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/7] perf: imx_perf: refactor driver for imx93
Date: Thu,  7 Mar 2024 10:47:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240307024754.3469810-2-xu.yang_2@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240307024754.3469810-1-xu.yang_2@nxp.com>

This driver is initinally used to support imx93 Soc and now it's time to
add support for imx95 Soc. However, some macro definitions and events are
different on these two Socs. For preparing imx95 supports, this will
refactor driver for imx93.

Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>

---
Changes in v4:
 - new patch
Changes in v5:
 - use is_visible to hide unwanted attributes as suggested by Will
---
 drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
index 9685645bfe04..f4dca813b174 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
@@ -11,14 +11,14 @@
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
 
 /* Performance monitor configuration */
-#define PMCFG1  			0x00
-#define PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN 	BIT(31)
-#define PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN 	BIT(30)
-#define PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN 		BIT(29)
-#define PMCFG1_ID_MASK  		GENMASK(17, 0)
+#define PMCFG1				0x00
+#define MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN	BIT(31)
+#define MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN	BIT(30)
+#define MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN	BIT(29)
+#define MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK		GENMASK(17, 0)
 
-#define PMCFG2  			0x04
-#define PMCFG2_ID			GENMASK(17, 0)
+#define PMCFG2				0x04
+#define MX93_PMCFG2_ID			GENMASK(17, 0)
 
 /* Global control register affects all counters and takes priority over local control registers */
 #define PMGC0		0x40
@@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ static const struct imx_ddr_devtype_data imx93_devtype_data = {
 	.identifier = "imx93",
 };
 
+static inline bool is_imx93(struct ddr_pmu *pmu)
+{
+	return pmu->devtype_data == &imx93_devtype_data;
+}
+
 static const struct of_device_id imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "fsl,imx93-ddr-pmu", .data = &imx93_devtype_data},
 	{ /* sentinel */ }
@@ -178,7 +183,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_ld_wiq_6, 70),
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_ld_wiq_7, 71),
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_empty, 72),
-	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt, 73),
+	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt, 73),	/* imx93 specific*/
 
 	/* counter3 specific events */
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_0, 64),
@@ -190,7 +195,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_6, 70),
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_7, 71),
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_full, 72),
-	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt, 73),
+	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt, 73),	/* imx93 specific*/
 
 	/* counter4 specific events */
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_0, 64),
@@ -202,7 +207,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_6, 70),
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_7, 71),
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_ld_rdq2_rmw, 72),
-	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt, 73),
+	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt, 73),	/* imx93 specific*/
 
 	/* counter5 specific events */
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_valid_start_0, 64),
@@ -237,9 +242,26 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
 	NULL,
 };
 
+static umode_t
+ddr_perf_events_attrs_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
+				       struct attribute *attr, int unused)
+{
+	struct pmu *pmu = dev_get_drvdata(kobj_to_dev(kobj));
+	struct ddr_pmu *ddr_pmu = to_ddr_pmu(pmu);
+
+	if ((!strcmp(attr->name, "eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt") ||
+		!strcmp(attr->name, "eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt") ||
+		!strcmp(attr->name, "eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt")) &&
+		!is_imx93(ddr_pmu))
+		return 0;
+
+	return attr->mode;
+}
+
 static const struct attribute_group ddr_perf_events_attr_group = {
 	.name = "events",
 	.attrs = ddr_perf_events_attrs,
+	.is_visible = ddr_perf_events_attrs_is_visible,
 };
 
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-7");
@@ -361,7 +383,7 @@ static void ddr_perf_counter_local_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int config,
 	}
 }
 
-static void ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int cfg, int cfg1, int cfg2)
+static void imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int cfg, int cfg1, int cfg2)
 {
 	u32 pmcfg1, pmcfg2;
 	int event, counter;
@@ -372,27 +394,27 @@ static void ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int cfg, int cfg1, int
 	pmcfg1 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG1);
 
 	if (counter == 2 && event == 73)
-		pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
+		pmcfg1 |= MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
 	else if (counter == 2 && event != 73)
-		pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
+		pmcfg1 &= ~MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
 
 	if (counter == 3 && event == 73)
-		pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
+		pmcfg1 |= MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
 	else if (counter == 3 && event != 73)
-		pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
+		pmcfg1 &= ~MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
 
 	if (counter == 4 && event == 73)
-		pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
+		pmcfg1 |= MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
 	else if (counter == 4 && event != 73)
-		pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
+		pmcfg1 &= ~MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
 
-	pmcfg1 &= ~FIELD_PREP(PMCFG1_ID_MASK, 0x3FFFF);
-	pmcfg1 |= FIELD_PREP(PMCFG1_ID_MASK, cfg2);
+	pmcfg1 &= ~FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK, 0x3FFFF);
+	pmcfg1 |= FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK, cfg2);
 	writel(pmcfg1, pmu->base + PMCFG1);
 
 	pmcfg2 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG2);
-	pmcfg2 &= ~FIELD_PREP(PMCFG2_ID, 0x3FFFF);
-	pmcfg2 |= FIELD_PREP(PMCFG2_ID, cfg1);
+	pmcfg2 &= ~FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG2_ID, 0x3FFFF);
+	pmcfg2 |= FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG2_ID, cfg1);
 	writel(pmcfg2, pmu->base + PMCFG2);
 }
 
@@ -480,7 +502,7 @@ static int ddr_perf_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 		ddr_perf_event_start(event, flags);
 
 	/* read trans, write trans, read beat */
-	ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, cfg, cfg1, cfg2);
+	imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, cfg, cfg1, cfg2);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.34.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>
To: Frank.li@nxp.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com,
	john.g.garry@oracle.com, jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
	irogers@google.com
Cc: mike.leach@linaro.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	adrian.hunter@intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/7] perf: imx_perf: refactor driver for imx93
Date: Thu,  7 Mar 2024 10:47:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240307024754.3469810-2-xu.yang_2@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240307024754.3469810-1-xu.yang_2@nxp.com>

This driver is initinally used to support imx93 Soc and now it's time to
add support for imx95 Soc. However, some macro definitions and events are
different on these two Socs. For preparing imx95 supports, this will
refactor driver for imx93.

Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>

---
Changes in v4:
 - new patch
Changes in v5:
 - use is_visible to hide unwanted attributes as suggested by Will
---
 drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
index 9685645bfe04..f4dca813b174 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
@@ -11,14 +11,14 @@
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
 
 /* Performance monitor configuration */
-#define PMCFG1  			0x00
-#define PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN 	BIT(31)
-#define PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN 	BIT(30)
-#define PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN 		BIT(29)
-#define PMCFG1_ID_MASK  		GENMASK(17, 0)
+#define PMCFG1				0x00
+#define MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN	BIT(31)
+#define MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN	BIT(30)
+#define MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN	BIT(29)
+#define MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK		GENMASK(17, 0)
 
-#define PMCFG2  			0x04
-#define PMCFG2_ID			GENMASK(17, 0)
+#define PMCFG2				0x04
+#define MX93_PMCFG2_ID			GENMASK(17, 0)
 
 /* Global control register affects all counters and takes priority over local control registers */
 #define PMGC0		0x40
@@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ static const struct imx_ddr_devtype_data imx93_devtype_data = {
 	.identifier = "imx93",
 };
 
+static inline bool is_imx93(struct ddr_pmu *pmu)
+{
+	return pmu->devtype_data == &imx93_devtype_data;
+}
+
 static const struct of_device_id imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "fsl,imx93-ddr-pmu", .data = &imx93_devtype_data},
 	{ /* sentinel */ }
@@ -178,7 +183,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_ld_wiq_6, 70),
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_ld_wiq_7, 71),
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_empty, 72),
-	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt, 73),
+	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt, 73),	/* imx93 specific*/
 
 	/* counter3 specific events */
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_0, 64),
@@ -190,7 +195,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_6, 70),
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_7, 71),
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_full, 72),
-	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt, 73),
+	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt, 73),	/* imx93 specific*/
 
 	/* counter4 specific events */
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_0, 64),
@@ -202,7 +207,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_6, 70),
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_7, 71),
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_ld_rdq2_rmw, 72),
-	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt, 73),
+	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt, 73),	/* imx93 specific*/
 
 	/* counter5 specific events */
 	IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_valid_start_0, 64),
@@ -237,9 +242,26 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
 	NULL,
 };
 
+static umode_t
+ddr_perf_events_attrs_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
+				       struct attribute *attr, int unused)
+{
+	struct pmu *pmu = dev_get_drvdata(kobj_to_dev(kobj));
+	struct ddr_pmu *ddr_pmu = to_ddr_pmu(pmu);
+
+	if ((!strcmp(attr->name, "eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt") ||
+		!strcmp(attr->name, "eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt") ||
+		!strcmp(attr->name, "eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt")) &&
+		!is_imx93(ddr_pmu))
+		return 0;
+
+	return attr->mode;
+}
+
 static const struct attribute_group ddr_perf_events_attr_group = {
 	.name = "events",
 	.attrs = ddr_perf_events_attrs,
+	.is_visible = ddr_perf_events_attrs_is_visible,
 };
 
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-7");
@@ -361,7 +383,7 @@ static void ddr_perf_counter_local_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int config,
 	}
 }
 
-static void ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int cfg, int cfg1, int cfg2)
+static void imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int cfg, int cfg1, int cfg2)
 {
 	u32 pmcfg1, pmcfg2;
 	int event, counter;
@@ -372,27 +394,27 @@ static void ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int cfg, int cfg1, int
 	pmcfg1 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG1);
 
 	if (counter == 2 && event == 73)
-		pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
+		pmcfg1 |= MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
 	else if (counter == 2 && event != 73)
-		pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
+		pmcfg1 &= ~MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
 
 	if (counter == 3 && event == 73)
-		pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
+		pmcfg1 |= MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
 	else if (counter == 3 && event != 73)
-		pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
+		pmcfg1 &= ~MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
 
 	if (counter == 4 && event == 73)
-		pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
+		pmcfg1 |= MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
 	else if (counter == 4 && event != 73)
-		pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
+		pmcfg1 &= ~MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
 
-	pmcfg1 &= ~FIELD_PREP(PMCFG1_ID_MASK, 0x3FFFF);
-	pmcfg1 |= FIELD_PREP(PMCFG1_ID_MASK, cfg2);
+	pmcfg1 &= ~FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK, 0x3FFFF);
+	pmcfg1 |= FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK, cfg2);
 	writel(pmcfg1, pmu->base + PMCFG1);
 
 	pmcfg2 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG2);
-	pmcfg2 &= ~FIELD_PREP(PMCFG2_ID, 0x3FFFF);
-	pmcfg2 |= FIELD_PREP(PMCFG2_ID, cfg1);
+	pmcfg2 &= ~FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG2_ID, 0x3FFFF);
+	pmcfg2 |= FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG2_ID, cfg1);
 	writel(pmcfg2, pmu->base + PMCFG2);
 }
 
@@ -480,7 +502,7 @@ static int ddr_perf_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 		ddr_perf_event_start(event, flags);
 
 	/* read trans, write trans, read beat */
-	ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, cfg, cfg1, cfg2);
+	imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, cfg, cfg1, cfg2);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-07  2:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-07  2:47 [PATCH v5 1/7] dt-bindings: perf: fsl-imx-ddr: Add i.MX95 compatible Xu Yang
2024-03-07  2:47 ` Xu Yang
2024-03-07  2:47 ` Xu Yang [this message]
2024-03-07  2:47   ` [PATCH v5 2/7] perf: imx_perf: refactor driver for imx93 Xu Yang
2024-03-07  2:47 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] perf: imx_perf: fix counter start and config sequence Xu Yang
2024-03-07  2:47   ` Xu Yang
2024-03-07  2:47 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] perf: imx_perf: add macro definitions for parsing config attr Xu Yang
2024-03-07  2:47   ` Xu Yang
2024-03-07  2:47 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] perf: imx_perf: add support for i.MX95 platform Xu Yang
2024-03-07  2:47   ` Xu Yang
2024-03-07  3:11   ` Frank Li
2024-03-07  3:11     ` Frank Li
2024-03-07  2:47 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] perf: imx_perf: limit counter ID from user space and optimize counter usage Xu Yang
2024-03-07  2:47   ` Xu Yang
2024-03-07  2:47 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] perf vendor events arm64:: Add i.MX95 DDR Performance Monitor metrics Xu Yang
2024-03-07  2:47   ` Xu Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240307024754.3469810-2-xu.yang_2@nxp.com \
    --to=xu.yang_2@nxp.com \
    --cc=Frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.