All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: lukasz.luba@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
	nm@ti.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org,
	alim.akhtar@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
	mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] PM: EM: Change the em_adjust_new_capacity() to re-use code
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:04:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240314140421.3563571-3-lukasz.luba@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240314140421.3563571-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>

There is going to be a new update function addressing chip binning.
Therefore, some common code which can be refactored and called from
upcoming changes and em_adjust_new_capacity(). In this way the code
duplication can be avoided.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
---
 kernel/power/energy_model.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
index 9e1c9aa399ea9..6960dd7393b2d 100644
--- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -674,23 +674,15 @@ void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_dev_unregister_perf_domain);
 
-/*
- * Adjustment of CPU performance values after boot, when all CPUs capacites
- * are correctly calculated.
- */
-static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
-				   struct em_perf_domain *pd,
-				   u64 max_cap)
+static struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table_dup(struct em_perf_domain *pd)
 {
 	struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table;
 	struct em_perf_state *ps, *new_ps;
-	int ret, ps_size;
+	int ps_size;
 
 	em_table = em_table_alloc(pd);
-	if (!em_table) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "EM: allocation failed\n");
-		return;
-	}
+	if (!em_table)
+		return NULL;
 
 	new_ps = em_table->state;
 
@@ -702,24 +694,52 @@ static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
 
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-	em_init_performance(dev, pd, new_ps, pd->nr_perf_states);
-	ret = em_compute_costs(dev, new_ps, NULL, pd->nr_perf_states,
+	return em_table;
+}
+
+static int em_recalc_and_update(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+				struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = em_compute_costs(dev, em_table->state, NULL, pd->nr_perf_states,
 			       pd->flags);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "EM: compute costs failed\n");
-		return;
-	}
+	if (ret)
+		goto free_em_table;
 
 	ret = em_dev_update_perf_domain(dev, em_table);
 	if (ret)
-		dev_warn(dev, "EM: update failed %d\n", ret);
+		goto free_em_table;
 
 	/*
 	 * This is one-time-update, so give up the ownership in this updater.
 	 * The EM framework has incremented the usage counter and from now
 	 * will keep the reference (then free the memory when needed).
 	 */
+free_em_table:
 	em_table_free(em_table);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Adjustment of CPU performance values after boot, when all CPUs capacites
+ * are correctly calculated.
+ */
+static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
+				   struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+				   u64 max_cap)
+{
+	struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table;
+
+	em_table = em_table_dup(pd);
+	if (!em_table) {
+		dev_warn(dev, "EM: allocation failed\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	em_init_performance(dev, pd, em_table->state, pd->nr_perf_states);
+
+	em_recalc_and_update(dev, pd, em_table);
 }
 
 static void em_check_capacity_update(void)
-- 
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: lukasz.luba@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
	nm@ti.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org,
	alim.akhtar@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
	mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] PM: EM: Change the em_adjust_new_capacity() to re-use code
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:04:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240314140421.3563571-3-lukasz.luba@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240314140421.3563571-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>

There is going to be a new update function addressing chip binning.
Therefore, some common code which can be refactored and called from
upcoming changes and em_adjust_new_capacity(). In this way the code
duplication can be avoided.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
---
 kernel/power/energy_model.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
index 9e1c9aa399ea9..6960dd7393b2d 100644
--- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -674,23 +674,15 @@ void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_dev_unregister_perf_domain);
 
-/*
- * Adjustment of CPU performance values after boot, when all CPUs capacites
- * are correctly calculated.
- */
-static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
-				   struct em_perf_domain *pd,
-				   u64 max_cap)
+static struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table_dup(struct em_perf_domain *pd)
 {
 	struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table;
 	struct em_perf_state *ps, *new_ps;
-	int ret, ps_size;
+	int ps_size;
 
 	em_table = em_table_alloc(pd);
-	if (!em_table) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "EM: allocation failed\n");
-		return;
-	}
+	if (!em_table)
+		return NULL;
 
 	new_ps = em_table->state;
 
@@ -702,24 +694,52 @@ static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
 
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-	em_init_performance(dev, pd, new_ps, pd->nr_perf_states);
-	ret = em_compute_costs(dev, new_ps, NULL, pd->nr_perf_states,
+	return em_table;
+}
+
+static int em_recalc_and_update(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+				struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = em_compute_costs(dev, em_table->state, NULL, pd->nr_perf_states,
 			       pd->flags);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_warn(dev, "EM: compute costs failed\n");
-		return;
-	}
+	if (ret)
+		goto free_em_table;
 
 	ret = em_dev_update_perf_domain(dev, em_table);
 	if (ret)
-		dev_warn(dev, "EM: update failed %d\n", ret);
+		goto free_em_table;
 
 	/*
 	 * This is one-time-update, so give up the ownership in this updater.
 	 * The EM framework has incremented the usage counter and from now
 	 * will keep the reference (then free the memory when needed).
 	 */
+free_em_table:
 	em_table_free(em_table);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Adjustment of CPU performance values after boot, when all CPUs capacites
+ * are correctly calculated.
+ */
+static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
+				   struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+				   u64 max_cap)
+{
+	struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table;
+
+	em_table = em_table_dup(pd);
+	if (!em_table) {
+		dev_warn(dev, "EM: allocation failed\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	em_init_performance(dev, pd, em_table->state, pd->nr_perf_states);
+
+	em_recalc_and_update(dev, pd, em_table);
 }
 
 static void em_check_capacity_update(void)
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-14 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-14 14:04 [PATCH 0/4] Update Energy Model after chip binning adjusted voltages Lukasz Luba
2024-03-14 14:04 ` Lukasz Luba
2024-03-14 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] OPP: OF: Export dev_opp_pm_calc_power() for usage from EM Lukasz Luba
2024-03-14 14:04   ` Lukasz Luba
2024-03-14 14:04 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2024-03-14 14:04   ` [PATCH 2/4] PM: EM: Change the em_adjust_new_capacity() to re-use code Lukasz Luba
2024-03-14 14:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] PM: EM: Add em_dev_update_chip_binning() Lukasz Luba
2024-03-14 14:04   ` Lukasz Luba
2024-03-14 14:32   ` Christian Loehle
2024-03-14 14:32     ` Christian Loehle
2024-03-22 10:26     ` Lukasz Luba
2024-03-22 10:26       ` Lukasz Luba
2024-03-15 15:54   ` kernel test robot
2024-03-15 15:54     ` kernel test robot
2024-03-15 16:36   ` kernel test robot
2024-03-15 16:36     ` kernel test robot
2024-03-14 14:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] soc: samsung: exynos-asv: Update Energy Model after adjusting voltage Lukasz Luba
2024-03-14 14:04   ` Lukasz Luba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240314140421.3563571-3-lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.