All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>, Max Zhen <max.zhen@amd.com>,
	Sonal Santan <sonal.santan@amd.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
	Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
	Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/2] of: dynamic: Synchronize of_changeset_destroy() with the devlink removals
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:21:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240325152140.198219-3-herve.codina@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240325152140.198219-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com>

In the following sequence:
  1) of_platform_depopulate()
  2) of_overlay_remove()

During the step 1, devices are destroyed and devlinks are removed.
During the step 2, OF nodes are destroyed but
__of_changeset_entry_destroy() can raise warnings related to missing
of_node_put():
  ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2 ...

Indeed, during the devlink removals performed at step 1, the removal
itself releasing the device (and the attached of_node) is done by a job
queued in a workqueue and so, it is done asynchronously with respect to
function calls.
When the warning is present, of_node_put() will be called but wrongly
too late from the workqueue job.

In order to be sure that any ongoing devlink removals are done before
the of_node destruction, synchronize the of_changeset_destroy() with the
devlink removals.

Fixes: 80dd33cf72d1 ("drivers: base: Fix device link removal")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Tested-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
---
 drivers/of/dynamic.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
index 3bf27052832f..4d57a4e34105 100644
--- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c
+++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 
 #define pr_fmt(fmt)	"OF: " fmt
 
+#include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -667,6 +668,17 @@ void of_changeset_destroy(struct of_changeset *ocs)
 {
 	struct of_changeset_entry *ce, *cen;
 
+	/*
+	 * When a device is deleted, the device links to/from it are also queued
+	 * for deletion. Until these device links are freed, the devices
+	 * themselves aren't freed. If the device being deleted is due to an
+	 * overlay change, this device might be holding a reference to a device
+	 * node that will be freed. So, wait until all already pending device
+	 * links are deleted before freeing a device node. This ensures we don't
+	 * free any device node that has a non-zero reference count.
+	 */
+	device_link_wait_removal();
+
 	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(ce, cen, &ocs->entries, node)
 		__of_changeset_entry_destroy(ce);
 }
-- 
2.44.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-25 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-25 15:21 [PATCH v6 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals Herve Codina
2024-03-25 15:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal() Herve Codina
2024-03-25 16:44   ` Rob Herring
2024-03-26  8:20     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-03-25 18:37   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-03-26  7:56     ` Herve Codina
2024-03-25 18:38   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-03-26  7:05     ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-25 15:21 ` Herve Codina [this message]
2024-03-26 20:43 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240325152140.198219-3-herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
    --cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
    --cc=max.zhen@amd.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=sonal.santan@amd.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.