All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: vinod.govindapillai@intel.com, stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com,
	ville.syrjala@intel.com, jani.saarinen@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 2/6] drm/i915/display: Extract code required to calculate max qgv/psf gv point
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 01:10:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240326231021.281780-3-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240326231021.281780-1-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>

From: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>

We need that in order to force disable SAGV in next patch.
Also it is beneficial to separate that code, as in majority cases,
when SAGV is enabled, we don't even need those calculations.
Also we probably need to determine max PSF GV point as well, however
currently we don't do that when we disable SAGV, which might be
actually causing some issues in that case.

v2: - Introduce helper adl_qgv_bw(counterpart to adl_psf_bw)
      (Ville Syrjälä)
    - Don't restrict psf gv points for SAGV disable case
      (Ville Syrjälä)
v3: - Update icl_max_bw_qgv_point_mask to return max qgv point
      mask (Vinod)
v4: - Minor changes in icl_find_qgv_points (Vinod)

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 80 +++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
index 77886cc21211..c00094e5f11c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
@@ -661,6 +661,22 @@ static unsigned int adl_psf_bw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	return bi->psf_bw[psf_gv_point];
 }
 
+static unsigned int icl_qgv_bw(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+			       int num_active_planes, int qgv_point)
+{
+	unsigned int idx;
+
+	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
+		idx = tgl_max_bw_index(i915, num_active_planes, qgv_point);
+	else
+		idx = icl_max_bw_index(i915, num_active_planes, qgv_point);
+
+	if (idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(i915->display.bw.max))
+		return 0;
+
+	return i915->display.bw.max[idx].deratedbw[qgv_point];
+}
+
 void intel_bw_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
 	if (!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
@@ -806,6 +822,35 @@ intel_atomic_get_bw_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	return to_intel_bw_state(bw_state);
 }
 
+static unsigned int icl_max_bw_qgv_point_mask(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+					      int num_active_planes)
+{
+	unsigned int num_qgv_points = i915->display.bw.max[0].num_qgv_points;
+	unsigned int max_bw_point_mask = 0;
+	unsigned int max_bw = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_qgv_points; i++) {
+		unsigned int max_data_rate =
+			icl_qgv_bw(i915, num_active_planes, i);
+
+		/*
+		 * We need to know which qgv point gives us
+		 * maximum bandwidth in order to disable SAGV
+		 * if we find that we exceed SAGV block time
+		 * with watermarks. By that moment we already
+		 * have those, as it is calculated earlier in
+		 * intel_atomic_check,
+		 */
+		if (max_data_rate > max_bw) {
+			max_bw_point_mask = BIT(i);
+			max_bw = max_data_rate;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return max_bw_point_mask;
+}
+
 static int mtl_find_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 			       unsigned int data_rate,
 			       unsigned int num_active_planes,
@@ -883,8 +928,6 @@ static int icl_find_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 			       const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state,
 			       struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state)
 {
-	unsigned int max_bw_point = 0;
-	unsigned int max_bw = 0;
 	unsigned int num_psf_gv_points = i915->display.bw.max[0].num_psf_gv_points;
 	unsigned int num_qgv_points = i915->display.bw.max[0].num_qgv_points;
 	u16 psf_points = 0;
@@ -897,31 +940,8 @@ static int icl_find_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 		return ret;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num_qgv_points; i++) {
-		unsigned int idx;
-		unsigned int max_data_rate;
-
-		if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
-			idx = tgl_max_bw_index(i915, num_active_planes, i);
-		else
-			idx = icl_max_bw_index(i915, num_active_planes, i);
-
-		if (idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(i915->display.bw.max))
-			continue;
-
-		max_data_rate = i915->display.bw.max[idx].deratedbw[i];
-
-		/*
-		 * We need to know which qgv point gives us
-		 * maximum bandwidth in order to disable SAGV
-		 * if we find that we exceed SAGV block time
-		 * with watermarks. By that moment we already
-		 * have those, as it is calculated earlier in
-		 * intel_atomic_check,
-		 */
-		if (max_data_rate > max_bw) {
-			max_bw_point = i;
-			max_bw = max_data_rate;
-		}
+		unsigned int max_data_rate = icl_qgv_bw(i915,
+							num_active_planes, i);
 		if (max_data_rate >= data_rate)
 			qgv_points |= BIT(i);
 
@@ -965,9 +985,9 @@ static int icl_find_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 	 * cause.
 	 */
 	if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(i915, new_bw_state)) {
-		qgv_points = BIT(max_bw_point);
-		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "No SAGV, using single QGV point %d\n",
-			    max_bw_point);
+		qgv_points = icl_max_bw_qgv_point_mask(i915, num_active_planes);
+		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "No SAGV, using single QGV point mask 0x%x\n",
+			    qgv_points);
 	}
 
 	/*
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-26 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-26 23:10 [PATCH v9 0/6] QGV/SAGV related fixes Vinod Govindapillai
2024-03-26 23:10 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] drm/i915/display: Add meaningful traces for QGV point info error handling Vinod Govindapillai
2024-03-26 23:10 ` Vinod Govindapillai [this message]
2024-03-26 23:10 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] drm/i915/display: extract code to prepare qgv points mask Vinod Govindapillai
2024-03-26 23:10 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] drm/i915/display: Disable SAGV on bw init, to force QGV point recalculation Vinod Govindapillai
2024-03-26 23:10 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] drm/i915/display: handle systems with duplicate qgv/psf gv points Vinod Govindapillai
2024-03-26 23:10 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] drm/i915/display: force qgv check after the hw state readout Vinod Govindapillai
2024-03-26 23:20 ` [PATCH v9 0/6] QGV/SAGV related fixes Govindapillai, Vinod
2024-03-27  2:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for QGV/SAGV related fixes (rev9) Patchwork
2024-03-27  2:39 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-03-27 12:08 ` Patchwork
2024-03-27 16:03 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-03-28  2:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-04-01 17:00 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240326231021.281780-3-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
    --to=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.saarinen@intel.com \
    --cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.