All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
	"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
	angquan yu <angquan21@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] selftests: x86: skip the tests if prerequisites aren't fulfilled
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:17:17 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327111720.3509180-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com> (raw)

Skip instead of failing when prerequisite conditions aren't fulfilled,
such as invalid xstate values etc. This patch would make the tests show
as skip when run by:
  make -C tools/testing/selftests/ TARGETS=x86 run_tests

  ...
  # timeout set to 45
  # selftests: x86: amx_64
  # # xstate cpuid: invalid tile data size/offset: 0/0
  ok 42 selftests: x86: amx_64 # SKIP
  # timeout set to 45
  # selftests: x86: lam_64
  # # Unsupported LAM feature!
  ok 43 selftests: x86: lam_64 # SKIP
  ...

In amx test, Move away from check_cpuid_xsave() and start using
arch_prctl() to find out if amx support is present or not. In the
kernels where amx isn't present, arch_prctl returns -EINVAL. Hence it is
backward compatible.

Reviewed-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
---
Changes since v2:
- Update the changelog

Changes since v1:
- Use arch_prctl to check if amx is supported
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/amx.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/amx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/amx.c
index d884fd69dd510..95aad6d8849be 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/amx.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/amx.c
@@ -103,21 +103,6 @@ static void clearhandler(int sig)
 
 #define CPUID_LEAF1_ECX_XSAVE_MASK	(1 << 26)
 #define CPUID_LEAF1_ECX_OSXSAVE_MASK	(1 << 27)
-static inline void check_cpuid_xsave(void)
-{
-	uint32_t eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
-
-	/*
-	 * CPUID.1:ECX.XSAVE[bit 26] enumerates general
-	 * support for the XSAVE feature set, including
-	 * XGETBV.
-	 */
-	__cpuid_count(1, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
-	if (!(ecx & CPUID_LEAF1_ECX_XSAVE_MASK))
-		fatal_error("cpuid: no CPU xsave support");
-	if (!(ecx & CPUID_LEAF1_ECX_OSXSAVE_MASK))
-		fatal_error("cpuid: no OS xsave support");
-}
 
 static uint32_t xbuf_size;
 
@@ -350,6 +335,7 @@ enum expected_result { FAIL_EXPECTED, SUCCESS_EXPECTED };
 
 /* arch_prctl() and sigaltstack() test */
 
+#define ARCH_GET_XCOMP_SUPP	0x1021
 #define ARCH_GET_XCOMP_PERM	0x1022
 #define ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_PERM	0x1023
 
@@ -928,8 +914,15 @@ static void test_ptrace(void)
 
 int main(void)
 {
-	/* Check hardware availability at first */
-	check_cpuid_xsave();
+	unsigned long features;
+	long rc;
+
+	rc = syscall(SYS_arch_prctl, ARCH_GET_XCOMP_SUPP, &features);
+	if (rc || (features & XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE) != XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE) {
+		ksft_print_msg("no AMX support\n");
+		return KSFT_SKIP;
+	}
+
 	check_cpuid_xtiledata();
 
 	init_stashed_xsave();
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
index 215b8150b7cca..c0f016f45ee17 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
@@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	if (!cpu_has_lam()) {
 		ksft_print_msg("Unsupported LAM feature!\n");
-		return -1;
+		return KSFT_SKIP;
 	}
 
 	while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "ht:")) != -1) {
-- 
2.39.2


             reply	other threads:[~2024-03-27 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-27 11:17 Muhammad Usama Anjum [this message]
2024-03-28 18:42 ` [PATCH v3] selftests: x86: skip the tests if prerequisites aren't fulfilled Shuah Khan
2024-03-29  7:36   ` Ingo Molnar
2024-03-29 15:01     ` Shuah Khan
2024-03-30 11:08       ` Ingo Molnar
2024-03-29  7:51 ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/selftests: Skip " tip-bot2 for Muhammad Usama Anjum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240327111720.3509180-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com \
    --to=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
    --cc=angquan21@gmail.com \
    --cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.