All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>
To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <david@redhat.com>,
	<shr@devkernel.io>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <riel@surriel.com>,
	<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, <sunnanyong@huawei.com>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: <tujinjiang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] selftest/mm: ksm_functional_tests: extend test case for ksm fork/exec
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:10:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240328111010.1502191-4-tujinjiang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240328111010.1502191-1-tujinjiang@huawei.com>

This extends test_prctl_fork() and test_prctl_fork_exec() to make sure
that deduplication really happens, instead of only testing the
MMF_VM_MERGE_ANY flag is set.

Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>
---
 .../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c       | 49 ++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
index 5462873df84c..2d277620fad2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
@@ -475,6 +475,36 @@ static void test_prctl(void)
 	ksft_test_result_pass("Setting/clearing PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE works\n");
 }
 
+static int test_child_ksm(void)
+{
+	const unsigned int size = 2 * MiB;
+	char *map;
+
+	/* Test if KSM is enabled for the process. */
+	if (prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE, 0, 0, 0, 0) != 1)
+		return -1;
+
+	/* Test if merge could really happen. */
+	map = __mmap_and_merge_range(0xcf, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, KSM_MERGE_NONE);
+	if (map == MAP_MERGE_FAIL)
+		return -2;
+	else if (map == MAP_MERGE_SKIP)
+		return -3;
+
+	munmap(map, size);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void test_child_ksm_err(int status)
+{
+	if (status == -1)
+		ksft_test_result_fail("unexpected PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE result in child\n");
+	else if (status == -2)
+		ksft_test_result_fail("Merge in child failed\n");
+	else if (status == -3)
+		ksft_test_result_skip("Merge in child skiped\n");
+}
+
 /* Verify that prctl ksm flag is inherited. */
 static void test_prctl_fork(void)
 {
@@ -494,7 +524,7 @@ static void test_prctl_fork(void)
 
 	child_pid = fork();
 	if (!child_pid) {
-		exit(prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE, 0, 0, 0, 0));
+		exit(test_child_ksm());
 	} else if (child_pid < 0) {
 		ksft_test_result_fail("fork() failed\n");
 		return;
@@ -503,8 +533,11 @@ static void test_prctl_fork(void)
 	if (waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0) < 0) {
 		ksft_test_result_fail("waitpid() failed\n");
 		return;
-	} else if (WEXITSTATUS(status) != 1) {
-		ksft_test_result_fail("unexpected PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE result in child\n");
+	}
+
+	status = WEXITSTATUS(status);
+	if (status) {
+		test_child_ksm_err(status);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -516,12 +549,6 @@ static void test_prctl_fork(void)
 	ksft_test_result_pass("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE value is inherited\n");
 }
 
-static int ksm_fork_exec_child(void)
-{
-	/* Test if KSM is enabled for the process. */
-	return prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE, 0, 0, 0, 0) == 1;
-}
-
 static void test_prctl_fork_exec(void)
 {
 	int ret, status;
@@ -554,7 +581,7 @@ static void test_prctl_fork_exec(void)
 		if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
 			status = WEXITSTATUS(status);
 			if (status) {
-				ksft_test_result_fail("KSM not enabled\n");
+				test_child_ksm_err(status);
 				return;
 			}
 		} else {
@@ -635,7 +662,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	int err;
 
 	if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], FORK_EXEC_CHILD_PRG_NAME)) {
-		exit(ksm_fork_exec_child() == 1 ? 0 : 1);
+		exit(test_child_ksm());
 	}
 
 #ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
-- 
2.25.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-28 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-28 11:10 [PATCH v4 0/3] mm/ksm: fix ksm exec support for prctl Jinjiang Tu
2024-03-28 11:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] " Jinjiang Tu
2024-03-28 11:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] selftest/mm: ksm_functional_tests: refactor mmap_and_merge_range() Jinjiang Tu
2024-03-28 11:30   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-28 11:10 ` Jinjiang Tu [this message]
2024-03-28 11:33   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] selftest/mm: ksm_functional_tests: extend test case for ksm fork/exec David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240328111010.1502191-4-tujinjiang@huawei.com \
    --to=tujinjiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=shr@devkernel.io \
    --cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.