From: Piotr Wejman <piotrwejman90@gmail.com> To: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Piotr Wejman <piotrwejman90@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH v4] net: stmmac: fix rx queue priority assignment Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 21:22:39 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20240401192239.33942-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com> (raw) The driver should ensure that same priority is not mapped to multiple rx queues. From DesignWare Cores Ethernet Quality-of-Service Databook, section 17.1.29 MAC_RxQ_Ctrl2: "[...]The software must ensure that the content of this field is mutually exclusive to the PSRQ fields for other queues, that is, the same priority is not mapped to multiple Rx queues[...]" Previously rx_queue_priority() function was: - clearing all priorities from a queue - adding new priorities to that queue After this patch it will: - first assign new priorities to a queue - then remove those priorities from all other queues - keep other priorities previously assigned to that queue Fixes: a8f5102af2a7 ("net: stmmac: TX and RX queue priority configuration") Fixes: 2142754f8b9c ("net: stmmac: Add MAC related callbacks for XGMAC2") Signed-off-by: Piotr Wejman <piotrwejman90@gmail.com> --- Changes in v2: - Add some comments - Apply same changes to dwxgmac2_rx_queue_prio() - Revert "Rename prio argument to prio_mask" - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240219102405.32015-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/T/#u Changes in v3: - Fix trailing whitespace - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240226093144.31965-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/ Changes in v4: - amend comment and commit message - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240303190339.52496-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/ .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c | 40 ++++++++++++++----- .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c index 6b6d0de09619..eb2d0976d010 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c @@ -92,19 +92,41 @@ static void dwmac4_rx_queue_priority(struct mac_device_info *hw, u32 prio, u32 queue) { void __iomem *ioaddr = hw->pcsr; - u32 base_register; - u32 value; + u32 clear_mask = 0; + u32 ctrl2, ctrl3; + int i; - base_register = (queue < 4) ? GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2 : GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3; - if (queue >= 4) - queue -= 4; + ctrl2 = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2); + ctrl3 = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3); - value = readl(ioaddr + base_register); + /* The software must ensure that the same priority + * is not mapped to multiple Rx queues + */ + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) + clear_mask |= ((prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(i)) & + GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(i)); + + ctrl2 &= ~clear_mask; + ctrl3 &= ~clear_mask; + + /* First assign new priorities to a queue, then + * clear them from others queues + */ + if (queue < 4) { + ctrl2 |= (prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(queue)) & + GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(queue); - value &= ~GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(queue); - value |= (prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(queue)) & + writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2); + writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3); + } else { + queue -= 4; + + ctrl3 |= (prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(queue)) & GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(queue); - writel(value, ioaddr + base_register); + + writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3); + writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2); + } } static void dwmac4_tx_queue_priority(struct mac_device_info *hw, diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c index 1af2f89a0504..2bc05173884e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c @@ -105,17 +105,41 @@ static void dwxgmac2_rx_queue_prio(struct mac_device_info *hw, u32 prio, u32 queue) { void __iomem *ioaddr = hw->pcsr; - u32 value, reg; + u32 clear_mask = 0; + u32 ctrl2, ctrl3; + int i; - reg = (queue < 4) ? XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2 : XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3; - if (queue >= 4) + ctrl2 = readl(ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2); + ctrl3 = readl(ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3); + + /* The software must ensure that the same priority + * is not mapped to multiple Rx queues + */ + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) + clear_mask |= ((prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(i)) & + XGMAC_PSRQ(i)); + + ctrl2 &= ~clear_mask; + ctrl3 &= ~clear_mask; + + /* First assign new priorities to a queue, then + * clear them from others queues + */ + if (queue < 4) { + ctrl2 |= (prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(queue)) & + XGMAC_PSRQ(queue); + + writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2); + writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3); + } else { queue -= 4; - value = readl(ioaddr + reg); - value &= ~XGMAC_PSRQ(queue); - value |= (prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(queue)) & XGMAC_PSRQ(queue); + ctrl3 |= (prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(queue)) & + XGMAC_PSRQ(queue); - writel(value, ioaddr + reg); + writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3); + writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2); + } } static void dwxgmac2_tx_queue_prio(struct mac_device_info *hw, u32 prio, -- 2.25.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Piotr Wejman <piotrwejman90@gmail.com> To: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Piotr Wejman <piotrwejman90@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH v4] net: stmmac: fix rx queue priority assignment Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 21:22:39 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20240401192239.33942-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com> (raw) The driver should ensure that same priority is not mapped to multiple rx queues. From DesignWare Cores Ethernet Quality-of-Service Databook, section 17.1.29 MAC_RxQ_Ctrl2: "[...]The software must ensure that the content of this field is mutually exclusive to the PSRQ fields for other queues, that is, the same priority is not mapped to multiple Rx queues[...]" Previously rx_queue_priority() function was: - clearing all priorities from a queue - adding new priorities to that queue After this patch it will: - first assign new priorities to a queue - then remove those priorities from all other queues - keep other priorities previously assigned to that queue Fixes: a8f5102af2a7 ("net: stmmac: TX and RX queue priority configuration") Fixes: 2142754f8b9c ("net: stmmac: Add MAC related callbacks for XGMAC2") Signed-off-by: Piotr Wejman <piotrwejman90@gmail.com> --- Changes in v2: - Add some comments - Apply same changes to dwxgmac2_rx_queue_prio() - Revert "Rename prio argument to prio_mask" - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240219102405.32015-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/T/#u Changes in v3: - Fix trailing whitespace - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240226093144.31965-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/ Changes in v4: - amend comment and commit message - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240303190339.52496-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/ .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c | 40 ++++++++++++++----- .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c index 6b6d0de09619..eb2d0976d010 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c @@ -92,19 +92,41 @@ static void dwmac4_rx_queue_priority(struct mac_device_info *hw, u32 prio, u32 queue) { void __iomem *ioaddr = hw->pcsr; - u32 base_register; - u32 value; + u32 clear_mask = 0; + u32 ctrl2, ctrl3; + int i; - base_register = (queue < 4) ? GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2 : GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3; - if (queue >= 4) - queue -= 4; + ctrl2 = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2); + ctrl3 = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3); - value = readl(ioaddr + base_register); + /* The software must ensure that the same priority + * is not mapped to multiple Rx queues + */ + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) + clear_mask |= ((prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(i)) & + GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(i)); + + ctrl2 &= ~clear_mask; + ctrl3 &= ~clear_mask; + + /* First assign new priorities to a queue, then + * clear them from others queues + */ + if (queue < 4) { + ctrl2 |= (prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(queue)) & + GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(queue); - value &= ~GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(queue); - value |= (prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(queue)) & + writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2); + writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3); + } else { + queue -= 4; + + ctrl3 |= (prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(queue)) & GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(queue); - writel(value, ioaddr + base_register); + + writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3); + writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2); + } } static void dwmac4_tx_queue_priority(struct mac_device_info *hw, diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c index 1af2f89a0504..2bc05173884e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c @@ -105,17 +105,41 @@ static void dwxgmac2_rx_queue_prio(struct mac_device_info *hw, u32 prio, u32 queue) { void __iomem *ioaddr = hw->pcsr; - u32 value, reg; + u32 clear_mask = 0; + u32 ctrl2, ctrl3; + int i; - reg = (queue < 4) ? XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2 : XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3; - if (queue >= 4) + ctrl2 = readl(ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2); + ctrl3 = readl(ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3); + + /* The software must ensure that the same priority + * is not mapped to multiple Rx queues + */ + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) + clear_mask |= ((prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(i)) & + XGMAC_PSRQ(i)); + + ctrl2 &= ~clear_mask; + ctrl3 &= ~clear_mask; + + /* First assign new priorities to a queue, then + * clear them from others queues + */ + if (queue < 4) { + ctrl2 |= (prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(queue)) & + XGMAC_PSRQ(queue); + + writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2); + writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3); + } else { queue -= 4; - value = readl(ioaddr + reg); - value &= ~XGMAC_PSRQ(queue); - value |= (prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(queue)) & XGMAC_PSRQ(queue); + ctrl3 |= (prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(queue)) & + XGMAC_PSRQ(queue); - writel(value, ioaddr + reg); + writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3); + writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2); + } } static void dwxgmac2_tx_queue_prio(struct mac_device_info *hw, u32 prio, -- 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-01 19:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-04-01 19:22 Piotr Wejman [this message] 2024-04-01 19:22 ` [PATCH v4] net: stmmac: fix rx queue priority assignment Piotr Wejman 2024-04-04 2:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf 2024-04-04 2:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20240401192239.33942-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com \ --to=piotrwejman90@gmail.com \ --cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \ --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=edumazet@google.com \ --cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \ --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.