All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jianfeng Wang <jianfeng.w.wang@oracle.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
	iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	vbabka@suse.cz, junxiao.bi@oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH] slub: limit number of slabs to scan in count_partial()
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:40:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240411164023.99368-1-jianfeng.w.wang@oracle.com> (raw)

When reading "/proc/slabinfo", the kernel needs to report the number
of free objects for each kmem_cache. The current implementation relies
on count_partial() that counts the number of free objects by scanning
each kmem_cache_node's list of partial slabs and summing free objects
from every partial slab in the list. This process must hold per
kmem_cache_node spinlock and disable IRQ and may take a long time.
Consequently, it can block slab allocation requests on other CPU cores
and cause timeouts for network devices etc., when the partial slab list
is long. In production, even NMI watchdog can be triggered due to this
matter: e.g., for "buffer_head", the number of partial slabs was
observed to be ~1M in one kmem_cache_node. This problem was also
confirmed by several others [1-3] in the past.

Iterating a partial list to get the exact count of objects can cause
soft lockups for a long list with or without the lock (e.g., if
preemption is disabled), and is not very useful too: the object
count can change right after the lock is released. The approach of
maintaining free-object counters requires atomic operations on the
fast path [3].

So, the fix is to limit the number of slabs to scan in
count_partial(), and output an approximated result if the list is too
long. Default to 10000 which should be enough for most sane cases.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/
alpine.DEB.2.21.2003031602460.1537@www.lameter.com/T/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2008071258020.55871@www.lameter.com/T/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
1e01092b-140d-2bab-aeba-321a74a194ee@linux.com/T/

Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Wang <jianfeng.w.wang@oracle.com>
---
 mm/slub.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 1bb2a93cf7b6..5ed998ec7d6d 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -3213,16 +3213,25 @@ static inline bool free_debug_processing(struct kmem_cache *s,
 #endif /* CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG */
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG) || defined(SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS)
+#define MAX_PARTIAL_TO_SCAN 10000
+
 static unsigned long count_partial(struct kmem_cache_node *n,
 					int (*get_count)(struct slab *))
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned long x = 0;
+	unsigned long scanned = 0;
 	struct slab *slab;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
-	list_for_each_entry(slab, &n->partial, slab_list)
+	list_for_each_entry(slab, &n->partial, slab_list) {
 		x += get_count(slab);
+		if (++scanned > MAX_PARTIAL_TO_SCAN) {
+			/* Approximate total count of objects */
+			x = mult_frac(x, n->nr_partial, scanned);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
 	return x;
 }
-- 
2.42.1


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-11 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-11 16:40 Jianfeng Wang [this message]
2024-04-11 17:02 ` [PATCH] slub: limit number of slabs to scan in count_partial() Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-04-12  7:48   ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-04-12 17:29     ` [External] : " Jianfeng Wang
2024-04-12 18:16       ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-04-12 18:32         ` Jianfeng Wang
2024-04-12 20:20       ` [External] : " Vlastimil Babka
2024-04-12 20:44         ` Jianfeng Wang
2024-04-13  1:17           ` Jianfeng Wang
2024-04-15  7:35             ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-04-16 18:58               ` Jianfeng Wang
2024-04-16 20:14                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-04-15 16:20             ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-04-13  4:43         ` [External] : " Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-12  7:41 ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240411164023.99368-1-jianfeng.w.wang@oracle.com \
    --to=jianfeng.w.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.