All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: <linuxarm@huawei.com>, <justin.he@arm.com>, <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 06/18] ACPI: scan: Add parameter to allow defering some actions in acpi_scan_check_and_detach.
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Precursor patch adds the ability to pass a flag (not yet used) into
acpi_scan_check_and detach().  Done in a separate patch with no
functional changes to reduce complexity of the actual deferal which
follows.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

---
v5: New patch resulting from rebase.
    - Internal review suggested we could also do this with flags
      so I'm looking for feedback on which option people find
      more readable.
---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 7c157bf92695..79b1f4d2b6bd 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -244,13 +244,19 @@ static int acpi_scan_try_to_offline(struct acpi_device *device)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *check)
+struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param {
+	bool check_status;
+	bool eject;
+};
+
+static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *p)
 {
 	struct acpi_scan_handler *handler = adev->handler;
+	struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param *param = p;
 
-	acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_scan_check_and_detach, check);
+	acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_scan_check_and_detach, p);
 
-	if (check) {
+	if (param->check_status) {
 		acpi_bus_get_status(adev);
 		/*
 		 * Skip devices that are still there and take the enabled
@@ -288,7 +294,11 @@ static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *check)
 
 static void acpi_scan_check_subtree(struct acpi_device *adev)
 {
-	acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, (void *)true);
+	struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param p = {
+		.check_status = true, /* Not update until after ej0 */
+		.eject = false,
+	};
+	acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, &p);
 }
 
 static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
@@ -2600,7 +2610,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_scan);
  */
 void acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *adev)
 {
-	acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, NULL);
+	struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param p = {
+		.check_status = false,
+		.eject = false,
+	};
+
+	acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, &p);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_bus_trim);
 
-- 
2.39.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: <linuxarm@huawei.com>, <justin.he@arm.com>, <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 06/18] ACPI: scan: Add parameter to allow defering some actions in acpi_scan_check_and_detach.
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Precursor patch adds the ability to pass a flag (not yet used) into
acpi_scan_check_and detach().  Done in a separate patch with no
functional changes to reduce complexity of the actual deferal which
follows.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

---
v5: New patch resulting from rebase.
    - Internal review suggested we could also do this with flags
      so I'm looking for feedback on which option people find
      more readable.
---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 7c157bf92695..79b1f4d2b6bd 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -244,13 +244,19 @@ static int acpi_scan_try_to_offline(struct acpi_device *device)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *check)
+struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param {
+	bool check_status;
+	bool eject;
+};
+
+static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *p)
 {
 	struct acpi_scan_handler *handler = adev->handler;
+	struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param *param = p;
 
-	acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_scan_check_and_detach, check);
+	acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_scan_check_and_detach, p);
 
-	if (check) {
+	if (param->check_status) {
 		acpi_bus_get_status(adev);
 		/*
 		 * Skip devices that are still there and take the enabled
@@ -288,7 +294,11 @@ static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *check)
 
 static void acpi_scan_check_subtree(struct acpi_device *adev)
 {
-	acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, (void *)true);
+	struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param p = {
+		.check_status = true, /* Not update until after ej0 */
+		.eject = false,
+	};
+	acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, &p);
 }
 
 static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
@@ -2600,7 +2610,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_scan);
  */
 void acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *adev)
 {
-	acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, NULL);
+	struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param p = {
+		.check_status = false,
+		.eject = false,
+	};
+
+	acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, &p);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_bus_trim);
 
-- 
2.39.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-12 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-12 14:37 [PATCH v5 00/18] ACPI/arm64: add support for virtual cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] cpu: Do not warn on arch_register_cpu() returning -EPROBE_DEFER Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 17:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-12 17:42     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-22  3:53   ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-22  3:53     ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] ACPI: processor: Set the ACPI_COMPANION for the struct cpu instance Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 18:10   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-12 18:10     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 15:48     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 15:48       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 16:16       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 16:16         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 16:19         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 16:19           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 16:50           ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 16:50             ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 17:34             ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 17:34               ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 17:41               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 17:41                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-16 17:35                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-16 17:35                   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 18:30   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-12 18:30     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-12 20:16     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-04-12 20:16       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-04-12 20:54       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-12 20:54         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-12 21:52         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-04-12 21:52           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-04-12 23:23           ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-12 23:23             ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-15  8:45             ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15  8:45               ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15  9:16               ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15  9:16                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15  9:31                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15  9:31                   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:57                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:57                   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:37               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 11:37                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 11:56                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:56                   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 12:04                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 12:04                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 12:23                     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 12:23                       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-16 17:41                       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-16 17:41                         ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-16 19:02                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-16 19:02                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-17 10:39                           ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-17 10:39                             ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 12:37                     ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-15 12:37                       ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-15 12:41                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 12:41                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 11:51         ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-15 11:51           ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-15 12:51           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 12:51             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 15:31             ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-15 15:31               ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-15 16:38               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 16:38                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-17 15:01                 ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-17 15:01                   ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-17 16:19                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-17 16:19                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 10:52     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 10:52       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:11       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:11         ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-15 11:52       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 11:52         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-15 11:07     ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-15 11:07       ` Salil Mehta
2024-04-16 14:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-16 14:00     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init and remove pre-processor guards Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] ACPI: utils: Add an acpi_sta_enabled() helper and use it in acpi_processor_make_present() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-04-12 14:37   ` [PATCH v5 06/18] ACPI: scan: Add parameter to allow defering some actions in acpi_scan_check_and_detach Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] ACPI: convert acpi_processor_post_eject() to use IS_ENABLED() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] ACPI: Warn when the present bit changes but the feature is not enabled Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] arm64: arch_register_cpu() variant to allow checking of ACPI _STA Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] ACPI: add support to (un)register CPUs based on the _STA enabled bit Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online Jonathan Cameron
2024-04-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240412143719.11398-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.