All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
	Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace hardcoded value 0 for the initial value for SPTE
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:35:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240412173532.3481264-3-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240412173532.3481264-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

The TDX support will need the "suppress #VE" bit (bit 63) set as the
initial value for SPTE.  To reduce code change size, introduce a new macro
SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE for the initial value for the shadow page table
entry (SPTE) and replace hard-coded value 0 for it.  Initialize shadow page
tables with their value.

The plan is to unconditionally set the "suppress #VE" bit for both AMD and
Intel as: 1) AMD hardware uses the bit 63 as NX for present SPTE and
ignored for non-present SPTE; 2) for conventional VMX guests, KVM never
enables the "EPT-violation #VE" in VMCS control and "suppress #VE" bit is
ignored by hardware.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Message-Id: <acdf09bf60cad12c495005bf3495c54f6b3069c9.1705965635.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
[Remove unnecessary CONFIG_X86_64 check. - Paolo]
Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c         | 14 +++++++++-----
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h        |  4 +++-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c     | 12 ++++++------
 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 27d59c791ecc..addd7f7f7606 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -567,9 +567,9 @@ static u64 mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
 
 	if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte) ||
 	    !spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte))
-		__update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, 0ull);
+		__update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
 	else
-		old_spte = __update_clear_spte_slow(sptep, 0ull);
+		old_spte = __update_clear_spte_slow(sptep, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
 
 	if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte))
 		return old_spte;
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static u64 mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
  */
 static void mmu_spte_clear_no_track(u64 *sptep)
 {
-	__update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, 0ull);
+	__update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
 }
 
 static u64 mmu_spte_get_lockless(u64 *sptep)
@@ -1897,7 +1897,8 @@ static bool kvm_sync_page_check(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 
 static int kvm_sync_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int i)
 {
-	if (!sp->spt[i])
+	/* sp->spt[i] has initial value of shadow page table allocation */
+	if (sp->spt[i] == SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE)
 		return 0;
 
 	return vcpu->arch.mmu->sync_spte(vcpu, sp, i);
@@ -6128,7 +6129,10 @@ int kvm_mmu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache.kmem_cache = mmu_page_header_cache;
 	vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;
 
-	vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;
+	vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache.init_value =
+		SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE;
+	if (!vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache.init_value)
+		vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;
 
 	vcpu->arch.mmu = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
 	vcpu->arch.walk_mmu = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
index 4d4e98fe4f35..bebd73cd61bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ static int FNAME(sync_spte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int
 	gpa_t pte_gpa;
 	gfn_t gfn;
 
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!sp->spt[i]))
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(sp->spt[i] == SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE))
 		return 0;
 
 	first_pte_gpa = FNAME(get_level1_sp_gpa)(sp);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index f5c600c52f83..0f4ec2859474 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ static_assert(MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_BITS == 8 && MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_BITS == 11);
 
 #define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_BITS + MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_BITS - 1, 0)
 
+#define SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE	0ULL
+
 extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_host_writable_mask;
 extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_mmu_writable_mask;
 extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_nx_mask;
@@ -194,7 +196,7 @@ extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_nonpresent_or_rsvd_mask;
  *
  * Only used by the TDP MMU.
  */
-#define REMOVED_SPTE	0x5a0ULL
+#define REMOVED_SPTE	(SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE | 0x5a0ULL)
 
 /* Removed SPTEs must not be misconstrued as shadow present PTEs. */
 static_assert(!(REMOVED_SPTE & SPTE_MMU_PRESENT_MASK));
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index c6192a52bd31..f5401967897a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
 	 * here since the SPTE is going from non-present to non-present.  Use
 	 * the raw write helper to avoid an unnecessary check on volatile bits.
 	 */
-	__kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(iter->sptep, 0);
+	__kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(iter->sptep, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -740,8 +740,8 @@ static void __tdp_mmu_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 			continue;
 
 		if (!shared)
-			tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
-		else if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter, 0))
+			tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, &iter, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
+		else if (tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE))
 			goto retry;
 	}
 }
@@ -808,8 +808,8 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte)))
 		return false;
 
-	tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, kvm_mmu_page_as_id(sp), sp->ptep, old_spte, 0,
-			 sp->gfn, sp->role.level + 1);
+	tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, kvm_mmu_page_as_id(sp), sp->ptep, old_spte,
+			 SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE, sp->gfn, sp->role.level + 1);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ static bool tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 		    !is_last_spte(iter.old_spte, iter.level))
 			continue;
 
-		tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
+		tdp_mmu_iter_set_spte(kvm, &iter, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
 
 		/*
 		 * Zappings SPTEs in invalid roots doesn't require a TLB flush,
-- 
2.43.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-12 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-12 17:35 [PATCH 00/10] KVM: MMU changes for confidential computing Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-12 17:35 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: Allow page-sized MMU caches to be initialized with custom 64-bit values Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-12 17:35 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2024-04-15 12:53   ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace hardcoded value 0 for the initial value for SPTE Chao Gao
2024-04-12 17:35 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow non-zero value for non-present SPTE and removed SPTE Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-12 17:35 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Add Suppress VE bit to EPT shadow_mmio_mask/shadow_present_mask Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-15 13:07   ` Chao Gao
2024-04-16 17:41     ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-12 17:35 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Track shadow MMIO value on a per-VM basis Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-12 17:35 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM, x86: add architectural support code for #VE Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-12 17:35 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: VMX: Introduce test mode related to EPT violation VE Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-15 13:21   ` Chao Gao
2024-04-16 17:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-12 17:35 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass around full 64-bit error code for KVM page faults Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-12 17:35 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Use PFERR_GUEST_ENC_MASK to indicate fault is private Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-12 17:35 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: x86/mmu: check for invalid async page faults involving private memory Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240412173532.3481264-3-pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.