All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
	 Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: zswap: always shrink in zswap_store() if zswap_pool_reached_full
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 02:24:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240413022407.785696-2-yosryahmed@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240413022407.785696-1-yosryahmed@google.com>

The cleanup code in zswap_store() is not pretty, particularly the
'shrink' label at the bottom that ends up jumping between cleanup
labels.

Instead of having a dedicated label to shrink the pool, just use
zswap_pool_reached_full directly to figure out if the pool needs
shrinking. zswap_pool_reached_full should be true if and only if the
pool needs shrinking.

The only caveat is that the value of zswap_pool_reached_full may be
changed by concurrent zswap_store() calls between checking the limit and
testing zswap_pool_reached_full in the cleanup code. This is fine
because:
- If zswap_pool_reached_full was true during limit checking then became
  false during the cleanup code, then someone else already took care of
  shrinking the pool and there is no need to queue the worker. That
  would be a good change.
- If zswap_pool_reached_full was false during limit checking then became
  true during the cleanup code, then someone else hit the limit
  meanwhile. In this case, both threads will try to queue the worker,
  but it never gets queued more than once anyway. Also, calling
  queue_work() multiple times when the limit is hit could already happen
  today, so this isn't a significant change in any way.

Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
---
 mm/zswap.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
index 741957f36f38b..77b6bb2099763 100644
--- a/mm/zswap.c
+++ b/mm/zswap.c
@@ -1429,12 +1429,12 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
 	if (cur_pages >= max_pages) {
 		zswap_pool_limit_hit++;
 		zswap_pool_reached_full = true;
-		goto shrink;
+		goto reject;
 	}
 
 	if (zswap_pool_reached_full) {
 		if (cur_pages > zswap_accept_thr_pages())
-			goto shrink;
+			goto reject;
 		else
 			zswap_pool_reached_full = false;
 	}
@@ -1540,6 +1540,8 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
 	zswap_entry_cache_free(entry);
 reject:
 	obj_cgroup_put(objcg);
+	if (zswap_pool_reached_full)
+		queue_work(shrink_wq, &zswap_shrink_work);
 check_old:
 	/*
 	 * If the zswap store fails or zswap is disabled, we must invalidate the
@@ -1550,10 +1552,6 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
 	if (entry)
 		zswap_entry_free(entry);
 	return false;
-
-shrink:
-	queue_work(shrink_wq, &zswap_shrink_work);
-	goto reject;
 }
 
 bool zswap_load(struct folio *folio)
-- 
2.44.0.683.g7961c838ac-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-13  2:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-13  2:24 [PATCH v3 0/4] zswap same-filled and limit checking cleanups Yosry Ahmed
2024-04-13  2:24 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2024-04-13  2:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm: zswap: refactor limit checking from zswap_store() Yosry Ahmed
2024-04-16  0:29   ` Nhat Pham
2024-04-13  2:24 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: zswap: move more same-filled pages checks outside of zswap_store() Yosry Ahmed
2024-04-13  2:24 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm: zswap: remove same_filled module params Yosry Ahmed
2024-04-13 20:56   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2024-04-14 21:06     ` Yosry Ahmed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240413022407.785696-2-yosryahmed@google.com \
    --to=yosryahmed@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.