From: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>, Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@broadcom.com>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v7 22/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add a test for PMU snapshot functionality Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:44:19 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20240416184421.3693802-23-atishp@rivosinc.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240416184421.3693802-1-atishp@rivosinc.com> Verify PMU snapshot functionality by setting up the shared memory correctly and reading the counter values from the shared memory instead of the CSR. Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h | 25 +++ .../selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c | 12 ++ .../selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 181 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h index 6675ca673c77..046b432ae896 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h @@ -8,6 +8,12 @@ #ifndef SELFTEST_KVM_SBI_H #define SELFTEST_KVM_SBI_H +/* SBI spec version fields */ +#define SBI_SPEC_VERSION_DEFAULT 0x1 +#define SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MAJOR_SHIFT 24 +#define SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK 0x7f +#define SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MINOR_MASK 0xffffff + /* SBI return error codes */ #define SBI_SUCCESS 0 #define SBI_ERR_FAILURE -1 @@ -33,6 +39,9 @@ enum sbi_ext_id { }; enum sbi_ext_base_fid { + SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_SPEC_VERSION = 0, + SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_IMP_ID, + SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_IMP_VERSION, SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT = 3, }; enum sbi_ext_pmu_fid { @@ -60,6 +69,12 @@ union sbi_pmu_ctr_info { }; }; +struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data { + u64 ctr_overflow_mask; + u64 ctr_values[64]; + u64 reserved[447]; +}; + struct sbiret { long error; long value; @@ -113,4 +128,14 @@ struct sbiret sbi_ecall(int ext, int fid, unsigned long arg0, bool guest_sbi_probe_extension(int extid, long *out_val); +/* Make SBI version */ +static inline unsigned long sbi_mk_version(unsigned long major, + unsigned long minor) +{ + return ((major & SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK) << SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MAJOR_SHIFT) + | (minor & SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MINOR_MASK); +} + +unsigned long get_host_sbi_spec_version(void); + #endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_SBI_H */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c index e8211f5d6863..ccb35573749c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c @@ -502,3 +502,15 @@ bool guest_sbi_probe_extension(int extid, long *out_val) return true; } + +unsigned long get_host_sbi_spec_version(void) +{ + struct sbiret ret; + + ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_SPEC_VERSION, 0, + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); + + GUEST_ASSERT(!ret.error); + + return ret.value; +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c index 7c81691e39c5..9002ff451abf 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ #define RISCV_MAX_PMU_COUNTERS 64 union sbi_pmu_ctr_info ctrinfo_arr[RISCV_MAX_PMU_COUNTERS]; +/* Snapshot shared memory data */ +#define PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE BIT(30) +static void *snapshot_gva; +static vm_paddr_t snapshot_gpa; + /* Cache the available counters in a bitmask */ static unsigned long counter_mask_available; @@ -186,6 +191,32 @@ static unsigned long read_counter(int idx, union sbi_pmu_ctr_info ctrinfo) return counter_val; } +static inline void verify_sbi_requirement_assert(void) +{ + long out_val = 0; + bool probe; + + probe = guest_sbi_probe_extension(SBI_EXT_PMU, &out_val); + GUEST_ASSERT(probe && out_val == 1); + + if (get_host_sbi_spec_version() < sbi_mk_version(2, 0)) + __GUEST_ASSERT(0, "SBI implementation version doesn't support PMU Snapshot"); +} + +static void snapshot_set_shmem(vm_paddr_t gpa, unsigned long flags) +{ + unsigned long lo = (unsigned long)gpa; +#if __riscv_xlen == 32 + unsigned long hi = (unsigned long)(gpa >> 32); +#else + unsigned long hi = gpa == -1 ? -1 : 0; +#endif + struct sbiret ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM, + lo, hi, flags, 0, 0, 0); + + GUEST_ASSERT(ret.value == 0 && ret.error == 0); +} + static void test_pmu_event(unsigned long event) { unsigned long counter; @@ -234,6 +265,59 @@ static void test_pmu_event(unsigned long event) stop_reset_counter(counter, 0); } +static void test_pmu_event_snapshot(unsigned long event) +{ + unsigned long counter; + unsigned long counter_value_pre, counter_value_post; + unsigned long counter_init_value = 100; + struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *snapshot_data = snapshot_gva; + + counter = get_counter_index(0, counter_mask_available, 0, event); + counter_value_pre = read_counter(counter, ctrinfo_arr[counter]); + + /* Do not set the initial value */ + start_counter(counter, 0, 0); + dummy_func_loop(10000); + stop_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT); + + /* The counter value is updated w.r.t relative index of cbase */ + counter_value_post = READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0]); + __GUEST_ASSERT(counter_value_post > counter_value_pre, + "Event update verification failed: post [%lx] pre [%lx]\n", + counter_value_post, counter_value_pre); + + /* + * We can't just update the counter without starting it. + * Do start/stop twice to simulate that by first initializing to a very + * high value and a low value after that. + */ + WRITE_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0], ULONG_MAX/2); + start_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_INIT_SNAPSHOT, 0); + stop_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT); + counter_value_pre = READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0]); + + WRITE_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0], counter_init_value); + start_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_INIT_SNAPSHOT, 0); + stop_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT); + counter_value_post = READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0]); + __GUEST_ASSERT(counter_value_pre > counter_value_post, + "Counter reinitialization verification failed : post [%lx] pre [%lx]\n", + counter_value_post, counter_value_pre); + + /* Now set the initial value and compare */ + WRITE_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0], counter_init_value); + start_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_INIT_SNAPSHOT, 0); + dummy_func_loop(10000); + stop_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT); + + counter_value_post = READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0]); + __GUEST_ASSERT(counter_value_post > counter_init_value, + "Event update verification failed: post [%lx] pre [%lx]\n", + counter_value_post, counter_init_value); + + stop_reset_counter(counter, 0); +} + static void test_invalid_event(void) { struct sbiret ret; @@ -301,6 +385,34 @@ static void test_pmu_basic_sanity(void) GUEST_DONE(); } +static void test_pmu_events_snaphost(void) +{ + int num_counters = 0; + struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *snapshot_data = snapshot_gva; + int i; + + /* Verify presence of SBI PMU and minimum requrired SBI version */ + verify_sbi_requirement_assert(); + + snapshot_set_shmem(snapshot_gpa, 0); + + /* Get the counter details */ + num_counters = get_num_counters(); + update_counter_info(num_counters); + + /* Validate shared memory access */ + GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_overflow_mask), 0); + for (i = 0; i < num_counters; i++) { + if (counter_mask_available & (BIT(i))) + GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[i]), 0); + } + /* Only these two events are guranteed to be present */ + test_pmu_event_snapshot(SBI_PMU_HW_CPU_CYCLES); + test_pmu_event_snapshot(SBI_PMU_HW_INSTRUCTIONS); + + GUEST_DONE(); +} + static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct ucall uc; @@ -357,6 +469,35 @@ static void test_vm_events_test(void *guest_code) test_vm_destroy(vm); } +static void test_vm_setup_snapshot_mem(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + /* PMU Snapshot requires single page only */ + vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE, 1, 1, 0); + /* PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE is identity mapped */ + virt_map(vm, PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE, PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE, 1); + + snapshot_gva = (void *)(PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE); + snapshot_gpa = addr_gva2gpa(vcpu->vm, (vm_vaddr_t)snapshot_gva); + sync_global_to_guest(vcpu->vm, snapshot_gva); + sync_global_to_guest(vcpu->vm, snapshot_gpa); +} + +static void test_vm_events_snapshot_test(void *guest_code) +{ + struct kvm_vm *vm = NULL; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + + vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code); + __TEST_REQUIRE(__vcpu_has_sbi_ext(vcpu, KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_PMU), + "SBI PMU not available, skipping test"); + + test_vm_setup_snapshot_mem(vm, vcpu); + + run_vcpu(vcpu); + + test_vm_destroy(vm); +} + int main(void) { test_vm_basic_test(test_pmu_basic_sanity); @@ -365,5 +506,8 @@ int main(void) test_vm_events_test(test_pmu_events); pr_info("SBI PMU event verification test : PASS\n"); + test_vm_events_snapshot_test(test_pmu_events_snaphost); + pr_info("SBI PMU event verification with snapshot test : PASS\n"); + return 0; } -- 2.34.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>, Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@broadcom.com>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v7 22/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add a test for PMU snapshot functionality Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:44:19 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20240416184421.3693802-23-atishp@rivosinc.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240416184421.3693802-1-atishp@rivosinc.com> Verify PMU snapshot functionality by setting up the shared memory correctly and reading the counter values from the shared memory instead of the CSR. Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h | 25 +++ .../selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c | 12 ++ .../selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 181 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h index 6675ca673c77..046b432ae896 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h @@ -8,6 +8,12 @@ #ifndef SELFTEST_KVM_SBI_H #define SELFTEST_KVM_SBI_H +/* SBI spec version fields */ +#define SBI_SPEC_VERSION_DEFAULT 0x1 +#define SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MAJOR_SHIFT 24 +#define SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK 0x7f +#define SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MINOR_MASK 0xffffff + /* SBI return error codes */ #define SBI_SUCCESS 0 #define SBI_ERR_FAILURE -1 @@ -33,6 +39,9 @@ enum sbi_ext_id { }; enum sbi_ext_base_fid { + SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_SPEC_VERSION = 0, + SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_IMP_ID, + SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_IMP_VERSION, SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT = 3, }; enum sbi_ext_pmu_fid { @@ -60,6 +69,12 @@ union sbi_pmu_ctr_info { }; }; +struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data { + u64 ctr_overflow_mask; + u64 ctr_values[64]; + u64 reserved[447]; +}; + struct sbiret { long error; long value; @@ -113,4 +128,14 @@ struct sbiret sbi_ecall(int ext, int fid, unsigned long arg0, bool guest_sbi_probe_extension(int extid, long *out_val); +/* Make SBI version */ +static inline unsigned long sbi_mk_version(unsigned long major, + unsigned long minor) +{ + return ((major & SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK) << SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MAJOR_SHIFT) + | (minor & SBI_SPEC_VERSION_MINOR_MASK); +} + +unsigned long get_host_sbi_spec_version(void); + #endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_SBI_H */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c index e8211f5d6863..ccb35573749c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c @@ -502,3 +502,15 @@ bool guest_sbi_probe_extension(int extid, long *out_val) return true; } + +unsigned long get_host_sbi_spec_version(void) +{ + struct sbiret ret; + + ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_SPEC_VERSION, 0, + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); + + GUEST_ASSERT(!ret.error); + + return ret.value; +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c index 7c81691e39c5..9002ff451abf 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ #define RISCV_MAX_PMU_COUNTERS 64 union sbi_pmu_ctr_info ctrinfo_arr[RISCV_MAX_PMU_COUNTERS]; +/* Snapshot shared memory data */ +#define PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE BIT(30) +static void *snapshot_gva; +static vm_paddr_t snapshot_gpa; + /* Cache the available counters in a bitmask */ static unsigned long counter_mask_available; @@ -186,6 +191,32 @@ static unsigned long read_counter(int idx, union sbi_pmu_ctr_info ctrinfo) return counter_val; } +static inline void verify_sbi_requirement_assert(void) +{ + long out_val = 0; + bool probe; + + probe = guest_sbi_probe_extension(SBI_EXT_PMU, &out_val); + GUEST_ASSERT(probe && out_val == 1); + + if (get_host_sbi_spec_version() < sbi_mk_version(2, 0)) + __GUEST_ASSERT(0, "SBI implementation version doesn't support PMU Snapshot"); +} + +static void snapshot_set_shmem(vm_paddr_t gpa, unsigned long flags) +{ + unsigned long lo = (unsigned long)gpa; +#if __riscv_xlen == 32 + unsigned long hi = (unsigned long)(gpa >> 32); +#else + unsigned long hi = gpa == -1 ? -1 : 0; +#endif + struct sbiret ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM, + lo, hi, flags, 0, 0, 0); + + GUEST_ASSERT(ret.value == 0 && ret.error == 0); +} + static void test_pmu_event(unsigned long event) { unsigned long counter; @@ -234,6 +265,59 @@ static void test_pmu_event(unsigned long event) stop_reset_counter(counter, 0); } +static void test_pmu_event_snapshot(unsigned long event) +{ + unsigned long counter; + unsigned long counter_value_pre, counter_value_post; + unsigned long counter_init_value = 100; + struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *snapshot_data = snapshot_gva; + + counter = get_counter_index(0, counter_mask_available, 0, event); + counter_value_pre = read_counter(counter, ctrinfo_arr[counter]); + + /* Do not set the initial value */ + start_counter(counter, 0, 0); + dummy_func_loop(10000); + stop_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT); + + /* The counter value is updated w.r.t relative index of cbase */ + counter_value_post = READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0]); + __GUEST_ASSERT(counter_value_post > counter_value_pre, + "Event update verification failed: post [%lx] pre [%lx]\n", + counter_value_post, counter_value_pre); + + /* + * We can't just update the counter without starting it. + * Do start/stop twice to simulate that by first initializing to a very + * high value and a low value after that. + */ + WRITE_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0], ULONG_MAX/2); + start_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_INIT_SNAPSHOT, 0); + stop_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT); + counter_value_pre = READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0]); + + WRITE_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0], counter_init_value); + start_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_INIT_SNAPSHOT, 0); + stop_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT); + counter_value_post = READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0]); + __GUEST_ASSERT(counter_value_pre > counter_value_post, + "Counter reinitialization verification failed : post [%lx] pre [%lx]\n", + counter_value_post, counter_value_pre); + + /* Now set the initial value and compare */ + WRITE_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0], counter_init_value); + start_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_INIT_SNAPSHOT, 0); + dummy_func_loop(10000); + stop_counter(counter, SBI_PMU_STOP_FLAG_TAKE_SNAPSHOT); + + counter_value_post = READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[0]); + __GUEST_ASSERT(counter_value_post > counter_init_value, + "Event update verification failed: post [%lx] pre [%lx]\n", + counter_value_post, counter_init_value); + + stop_reset_counter(counter, 0); +} + static void test_invalid_event(void) { struct sbiret ret; @@ -301,6 +385,34 @@ static void test_pmu_basic_sanity(void) GUEST_DONE(); } +static void test_pmu_events_snaphost(void) +{ + int num_counters = 0; + struct riscv_pmu_snapshot_data *snapshot_data = snapshot_gva; + int i; + + /* Verify presence of SBI PMU and minimum requrired SBI version */ + verify_sbi_requirement_assert(); + + snapshot_set_shmem(snapshot_gpa, 0); + + /* Get the counter details */ + num_counters = get_num_counters(); + update_counter_info(num_counters); + + /* Validate shared memory access */ + GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_overflow_mask), 0); + for (i = 0; i < num_counters; i++) { + if (counter_mask_available & (BIT(i))) + GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(READ_ONCE(snapshot_data->ctr_values[i]), 0); + } + /* Only these two events are guranteed to be present */ + test_pmu_event_snapshot(SBI_PMU_HW_CPU_CYCLES); + test_pmu_event_snapshot(SBI_PMU_HW_INSTRUCTIONS); + + GUEST_DONE(); +} + static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct ucall uc; @@ -357,6 +469,35 @@ static void test_vm_events_test(void *guest_code) test_vm_destroy(vm); } +static void test_vm_setup_snapshot_mem(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + /* PMU Snapshot requires single page only */ + vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE, 1, 1, 0); + /* PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE is identity mapped */ + virt_map(vm, PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE, PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE, 1); + + snapshot_gva = (void *)(PMU_SNAPSHOT_GPA_BASE); + snapshot_gpa = addr_gva2gpa(vcpu->vm, (vm_vaddr_t)snapshot_gva); + sync_global_to_guest(vcpu->vm, snapshot_gva); + sync_global_to_guest(vcpu->vm, snapshot_gpa); +} + +static void test_vm_events_snapshot_test(void *guest_code) +{ + struct kvm_vm *vm = NULL; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + + vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code); + __TEST_REQUIRE(__vcpu_has_sbi_ext(vcpu, KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_PMU), + "SBI PMU not available, skipping test"); + + test_vm_setup_snapshot_mem(vm, vcpu); + + run_vcpu(vcpu); + + test_vm_destroy(vm); +} + int main(void) { test_vm_basic_test(test_pmu_basic_sanity); @@ -365,5 +506,8 @@ int main(void) test_vm_events_test(test_pmu_events); pr_info("SBI PMU event verification test : PASS\n"); + test_vm_events_snapshot_test(test_pmu_events_snaphost); + pr_info("SBI PMU event verification with snapshot test : PASS\n"); + return 0; } -- 2.34.1 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 18:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-04-16 18:43 [PATCH v7 00/24] RISC-V SBI v2.0 PMU improvements and Perf sampling in KVM guest Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:43 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:43 ` [PATCH v7 01/24] RISC-V: Fix the typo in Scountovf CSR name Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:43 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:43 ` [PATCH v7 02/24] RISC-V: Add FIRMWARE_READ_HI definition Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:43 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 03/24] drivers/perf: riscv: Read upper bits of a firmware counter Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 04/24] drivers/perf: riscv: Use BIT macro for shifting operations Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 05/24] RISC-V: Add SBI PMU snapshot definitions Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 06/24] RISC-V: KVM: Rename the SBI_STA_SHMEM_DISABLE to a generic name Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 07/24] RISC-V: Use the minor version mask while computing sbi version Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 08/24] drivers/perf: riscv: Implement SBI PMU snapshot function Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-17 4:02 ` Samuel Holland 2024-04-17 4:02 ` Samuel Holland 2024-04-18 7:47 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-18 7:47 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-18 20:01 ` Samuel Holland 2024-04-18 20:01 ` Samuel Holland 2024-04-19 23:42 ` Atish Kumar Patra 2024-04-19 23:42 ` Atish Kumar Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 09/24] drivers/perf: riscv: Fix counter mask iteration for RV32 Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 10/24] RISC-V: KVM: Fix the initial sample period value Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 11/24] RISC-V: KVM: No need to update the counter value during reset Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 12/24] RISC-V: KVM: No need to exit to the user space if perf event failed Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 13/24] RISC-V: KVM: Implement SBI PMU Snapshot feature Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 14/24] RISC-V: KVM: Add perf sampling support for guests Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 15/24] RISC-V: KVM: Support 64 bit firmware counters on RV32 Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 16/24] RISC-V: KVM: Improve firmware counter read function Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 17/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Move sbi definitions to its own header file Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 18/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add helper functions for extension checks Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 19/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add Sscofpmf to get-reg-list test Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 20/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI PMU extension definitions Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 21/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI PMU selftest Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra [this message] 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 22/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add a test for PMU snapshot functionality Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 23/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add a test for counter overflow Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH v7 24/24] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add commandline option for SBI PMU test Atish Patra 2024-04-16 18:44 ` Atish Patra 2024-04-16 20:54 ` [PATCH v7 00/24] RISC-V SBI v2.0 PMU improvements and Perf sampling in KVM guest Palmer Dabbelt 2024-04-16 20:54 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20240416184421.3693802-23-atishp@rivosinc.com \ --to=atishp@rivosinc.com \ --cc=ajay.kaher@broadcom.com \ --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \ --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \ --cc=anup@brainfault.org \ --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \ --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \ --cc=jgross@suse.com \ --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \ --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=shuah@kernel.org \ --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.