All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: v7 setup function should invalidate L1 cache
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 21:55:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2080993.BUNZpO9uLL@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6452458.LAJUB33YSi@phil>

On Tuesday 19 May 2015 23:44:58 Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> 
> Michael Niewoehner tested this on a rk3188 (Cortex-A9) and wrote in [0]
> > Tested-by: Michael Niewoehner <mniewoeh@stud.hs-offenburg.de>
> > 
> > Tested on Radxa Rock Pro with RK3188.
> > The kernel panics on reboot I had before and also a kernel BUG when running
> > "memtester 1900M" went away and the rock seems to run stable now.
> 

We should probably create a separate fix for that and add it to the stable
kernels then. I would suggest something like the untested patch below,
which takes advantage of the fact that we already have separate assignments
for the start_secondary function pointer for A9 and A17.

	Arnd

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
index 46c22dedf632..ae0077e8fe98 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 
 ENTRY(rockchip_secondary_startup)
-	mrc	p15, 0, r0, c0, c0, 0	@ read main ID register
-	ldr	r1, =0x00000c09		@ Cortex-A9 primary part number
-	teq	r0, r1
 	beq	v7_invalidate_l1
 	b	secondary_startup
 ENDPROC(rockchip_secondary_startup)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
index 5b4ca3c3c879..5f46724cca2f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
@@ -149,8 +149,7 @@ static int __cpuinit rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
 		 * sram_base_addr + 8: start address for pc
 		 * */
 		udelay(10);
-		writel(virt_to_phys(rockchip_secondary_startup),
-			sram_base_addr + 8);
+		writel(virt_to_phys(secondary_startup), sram_base_addr + 8);
 		writel(0xDEADBEAF, sram_base_addr + 4);
 		dsb_sev();
 	}


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Cc: "Heiko Stuebner" <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"Russell King"
	<rmk+kernel-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	"Gregory Clement"
	<gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
	"Thierry Reding"
	<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Alexandre Courbot"
	<gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Florian Fainelli"
	<f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Magnus Damm"
	<magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Michal Simek"
	<michal.simek-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Wei Xu" <xuwei5-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
	"Sören Brinkmann"
	<soren.brinkmann-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Michael Niewöhner"
	<mniewoeh-0BV18Q16miHGpFsiFCTsGXqWYbMAw+HU@public.gmane.org>,
	"Sebastian Hesselbarth"
	<sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Jason Cooper" <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Stephen Warren"
	<swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
	"Marc Carino"
	<marc.ceeeee-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"Gregory Fong"
	<gregory.0xf0-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: v7 setup function should invalidate L1 cache
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:55:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2080993.BUNZpO9uLL@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6452458.LAJUB33YSi@phil>

On Tuesday 19 May 2015 23:44:58 Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> 
> Michael Niewoehner tested this on a rk3188 (Cortex-A9) and wrote in [0]
> > Tested-by: Michael Niewoehner <mniewoeh-0BV18Q16miHGpFsiFCTsGXqWYbMAw+HU@public.gmane.org>
> > 
> > Tested on Radxa Rock Pro with RK3188.
> > The kernel panics on reboot I had before and also a kernel BUG when running
> > "memtester 1900M" went away and the rock seems to run stable now.
> 

We should probably create a separate fix for that and add it to the stable
kernels then. I would suggest something like the untested patch below,
which takes advantage of the fact that we already have separate assignments
for the start_secondary function pointer for A9 and A17.

	Arnd

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
index 46c22dedf632..ae0077e8fe98 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 
 ENTRY(rockchip_secondary_startup)
-	mrc	p15, 0, r0, c0, c0, 0	@ read main ID register
-	ldr	r1, =0x00000c09		@ Cortex-A9 primary part number
-	teq	r0, r1
 	beq	v7_invalidate_l1
 	b	secondary_startup
 ENDPROC(rockchip_secondary_startup)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
index 5b4ca3c3c879..5f46724cca2f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
@@ -149,8 +149,7 @@ static int __cpuinit rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
 		 * sram_base_addr + 8: start address for pc
 		 * */
 		udelay(10);
-		writel(virt_to_phys(rockchip_secondary_startup),
-			sram_base_addr + 8);
+		writel(virt_to_phys(secondary_startup), sram_base_addr + 8);
 		writel(0xDEADBEAF, sram_base_addr + 4);
 		dsb_sev();
 	}

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: v7 setup function should invalidate L1 cache
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:55:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2080993.BUNZpO9uLL@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6452458.LAJUB33YSi@phil>

On Tuesday 19 May 2015 23:44:58 Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> 
> Michael Niewoehner tested this on a rk3188 (Cortex-A9) and wrote in [0]
> > Tested-by: Michael Niewoehner <mniewoeh@stud.hs-offenburg.de>
> > 
> > Tested on Radxa Rock Pro with RK3188.
> > The kernel panics on reboot I had before and also a kernel BUG when running
> > "memtester 1900M" went away and the rock seems to run stable now.
> 

We should probably create a separate fix for that and add it to the stable
kernels then. I would suggest something like the untested patch below,
which takes advantage of the fact that we already have separate assignments
for the start_secondary function pointer for A9 and A17.

	Arnd

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
index 46c22dedf632..ae0077e8fe98 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 
 ENTRY(rockchip_secondary_startup)
-	mrc	p15, 0, r0, c0, c0, 0	@ read main ID register
-	ldr	r1, =0x00000c09		@ Cortex-A9 primary part number
-	teq	r0, r1
 	beq	v7_invalidate_l1
 	b	secondary_startup
 ENDPROC(rockchip_secondary_startup)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
index 5b4ca3c3c879..5f46724cca2f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c
@@ -149,8 +149,7 @@ static int __cpuinit rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
 		 * sram_base_addr + 8: start address for pc
 		 * */
 		udelay(10);
-		writel(virt_to_phys(rockchip_secondary_startup),
-			sram_base_addr + 8);
+		writel(virt_to_phys(secondary_startup), sram_base_addr + 8);
 		writel(0xDEADBEAF, sram_base_addr + 4);
 		dsb_sev();
 	}

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-19 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-19 16:12 [PATCH] ARM: v7 setup function should invalidate L1 cache Russell King
2015-05-19 16:12 ` Russell King
2015-05-19 21:44 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-05-19 21:44   ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-05-19 21:44   ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-05-19 21:55   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-05-19 21:55     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 21:55     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 22:07     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-19 22:07       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-19 22:07       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-19 22:18       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 22:18         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 22:18         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 22:32         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-19 22:32           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-19 22:32           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-19 22:01 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-05-19 22:01   ` Florian Fainelli
2015-05-19 22:01   ` Florian Fainelli
2015-05-20 18:54 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-05-20 18:54   ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-05-20 18:54   ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-05-20 22:48 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-05-20 22:48   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-05-20 22:48   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-05-21  2:08 ` Shawn Guo
2015-05-21  2:08   ` Shawn Guo
2015-05-21  2:08   ` Shawn Guo
2015-05-21  8:30 ` Thierry Reding
2015-05-21  8:30   ` Thierry Reding
2015-05-21  8:30   ` Thierry Reding
2015-05-22  7:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-22  7:36   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-22  7:36   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 10:41   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 10:41     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 10:41     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 10:53     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-01 10:53       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-01 10:53       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-01 11:50       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 11:50         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 11:50         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-17 20:35         ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 20:35           ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 20:35           ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 21:30           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-17 21:30             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-17 21:30             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-17 22:12             ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 22:12               ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 22:12               ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 22:31               ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 22:31                 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 22:31                 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 22:51                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-17 22:51                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-17 22:51                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-22 10:45 ` Michal Simek
2015-05-22 10:45   ` Michal Simek
2015-05-22 10:45   ` Michal Simek
2015-06-01 10:21 ` Wei Xu
2015-06-01 10:21   ` Wei Xu
2015-06-01 10:21   ` Wei Xu
2015-07-08  1:17 ` [PATCH] ARM: BCM63xx: Remove custom secondary_startup function Florian Fainelli
2015-07-12  1:34   ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2080993.BUNZpO9uLL@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.