All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
To: ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
	"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>,
	"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Fix referencing invalid rsp field
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 15:05:29 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <252651381.41652940482659.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CGME20220519060529epcms2p8941ce10ed8cfb50c142140f1f69f8612@epcms2p8

This is a patch for fixing referencing sense data when it is invalid.
When the length of the data segment is 0, there is no valid information in
the rsp field, so ufshpb_rsp_upiu() is returned without additional
operation.

Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c | 19 +++++++------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
index f1f65383e97d..8882b47f76d3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
@@ -1304,6 +1304,13 @@ void ufshpb_rsp_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
 	struct utp_hpb_rsp *rsp_field = &lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->hr;
 	int data_seg_len;
 
+	data_seg_len = be32_to_cpu(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->header.dword_2)
+		& MASK_RSP_UPIU_DATA_SEG_LEN;
+
+	/* If data segment length is zero, rsp_field is not valid */
+	if (!data_seg_len)
+		return;
+
 	if (unlikely(lrbp->lun != rsp_field->lun)) {
 		struct scsi_device *sdev;
 		bool found = false;
@@ -1338,18 +1345,6 @@ void ufshpb_rsp_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	data_seg_len = be32_to_cpu(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->header.dword_2)
-		& MASK_RSP_UPIU_DATA_SEG_LEN;
-
-	/* To flush remained rsp_list, we queue the map_work task */
-	if (!data_seg_len) {
-		if (!ufshpb_is_general_lun(hpb->lun))
-			return;
-
-		ufshpb_kick_map_work(hpb);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct utp_hpb_rsp) != UTP_HPB_RSP_SIZE);
 
 	if (!ufshpb_is_hpb_rsp_valid(hba, lrbp, rsp_field))
-- 
2.25.1



       reply	other threads:[~2022-05-19  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20220519060529epcms2p8941ce10ed8cfb50c142140f1f69f8612@epcms2p8>
2022-05-19  6:05 ` Daejun Park [this message]
2022-05-19  6:37   ` [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Fix referencing invalid rsp field Avri Altman
2022-05-19  6:46   ` Chanho Park
2022-05-20  1:08   ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=252651381.41652940482659.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp4 \
    --to=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.