All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Cc: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / WMI: Call acpi_wmi_init() later
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:49:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601877.IhOx20xkUK@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171208151159.urdcrzl5qpfd6jnu@earth.li>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Calling acpi_wmi_init() at the subsys_initcall() level causes ordering
issues to appear on some systems and they are difficult to reproduce,
because there is no guaranteed ordering between subsys_initcall()
calls, so they may occur in different orders on different systems.

In particular, commit 86d9f48534e8 (mm/slab: fix kmemcg cache
creation delayed issue) exposed one of these issues where genl_init()
and acpi_wmi_init() are both called at the same initcall level, but
the former must run before the latter so as to avoid a NULL pointer
dereference.

For this reason, move the acpi_wmi_init() invocation to the
initcall_sync level which should still be early enough for things
to work correctly in the WMI land.

Link: https://marc.info/?t=151274596700002&r=1&w=2
Reported-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Tested-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
@@ -1458,5 +1458,5 @@ static void __exit acpi_wmi_exit(void)
 	class_unregister(&wmi_bus_class);
 }
 
-subsys_initcall(acpi_wmi_init);
+subsys_initcall_sync(acpi_wmi_init);
 module_exit(acpi_wmi_exit);

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Cc: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / WMI: Call acpi_wmi_init() later
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:49:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601877.IhOx20xkUK@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171208151159.urdcrzl5qpfd6jnu@earth.li>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Calling acpi_wmi_init() at the subsys_initcall() level causes ordering
issues to appear on some systems and they are difficult to reproduce,
because there is no guaranteed ordering between subsys_initcall()
calls, so they may occur in different orders on different systems.

In particular, commit 86d9f48534e8 (mm/slab: fix kmemcg cache
creation delayed issue) exposed one of these issues where genl_init()
and acpi_wmi_init() are both called at the same initcall level, but
the former must run before the latter so as to avoid a NULL pointer
dereference.

For this reason, move the acpi_wmi_init() invocation to the
initcall_sync level which should still be early enough for things
to work correctly in the WMI land.

Link: https://marc.info/?t=151274596700002&r=1&w=2
Reported-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Tested-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
@@ -1458,5 +1458,5 @@ static void __exit acpi_wmi_exit(void)
 	class_unregister(&wmi_bus_class);
 }
 
-subsys_initcall(acpi_wmi_init);
+subsys_initcall_sync(acpi_wmi_init);
 module_exit(acpi_wmi_exit);

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-03 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-08 15:11 ACPI issues on cold power on [bisected] Jonathan McDowell
2017-12-08 15:11 ` Jonathan McDowell
2017-12-22  0:21 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-12-22  0:21   ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-12-29 16:36   ` Jonathan McDowell
2017-12-29 16:36     ` Jonathan McDowell
2018-01-02  2:54     ` Joonsoo Kim
2018-01-02  2:54       ` Joonsoo Kim
2018-01-02 10:25       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-02 10:25         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-03  2:11         ` Joonsoo Kim
2018-01-03  2:11           ` Joonsoo Kim
2018-01-03 10:38           ` Jonathan McDowell
2018-01-03 10:38             ` Jonathan McDowell
2018-01-03 11:29             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-03 11:29               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-03 11:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2018-01-03 11:49   ` [PATCH] ACPI / WMI: Call acpi_wmi_init() later Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-05 23:30   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-05 23:30     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-06  1:16     ` Darren Hart
2018-01-06  1:16       ` Darren Hart
2018-01-06 11:02     ` Jonathan McDowell
2018-01-06 11:02       ` Jonathan McDowell
2018-01-06 22:59       ` Darren Hart
2018-01-06 22:59         ` Darren Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601877.IhOx20xkUK@aspire.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=noodles@earth.li \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.