All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: farman@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
	pmorel@linux.ibm.com, alifm@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [RFC v2 2/3] vfio-ccw: Prevent quiesce function going into an infinite loop
Date: Mon,  8 Apr 2019 17:05:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c17cf29fbce8fc1cfbf60cfd04559d00c8eeac0.1554756534.git.alifm@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1554756534.git.alifm@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1554756534.git.alifm@linux.ibm.com>

The quiesce function calls cio_cancel_halt_clear() and if we
get an -EBUSY we go into a loop where we:
	- wait for any interrupts
	- flush all I/O in the workqueue
	- retry cio_cancel_halt_clear

During the period where we are waiting for interrupts or
flushing all I/O, the channel subsystem could have completed
a halt/clear action and turned off the corresponding activity
control bits in the subchannel status word. This means the next
time we call cio_cancel_halt_clear(), we will again start by
calling cancel subchannel and so we can be stuck between calling
cancel and halt forever.

Rather than calling cio_cancel_halt_clear() immediately after
waiting, let's try to disable the subchannel. If we succeed in
disabling the subchannel then we know nothing else can happen
with the device.

Suggested-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
index 5aca475..4405f2a 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
@@ -43,26 +43,23 @@ int vfio_ccw_sch_quiesce(struct subchannel *sch)
 	if (ret != -EBUSY)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
+	iretry = 255;
 	do {
-		iretry = 255;
 
 		ret = cio_cancel_halt_clear(sch, &iretry);
-		while (ret == -EBUSY) {
-			/*
-			 * Flush all I/O and wait for
-			 * cancel/halt/clear completion.
-			 */
-			private->completion = &completion;
-			spin_unlock_irq(sch->lock);
-
+		/*
+		 * Flush all I/O and wait for
+		 * cancel/halt/clear completion.
+		 */
+		private->completion = &completion;
+		spin_unlock_irq(sch->lock);
+
+		if (ret == -EBUSY)
 			wait_for_completion_timeout(&completion, 3*HZ);
 
-			private->completion = NULL;
-			flush_workqueue(vfio_ccw_work_q);
-			spin_lock_irq(sch->lock);
-			ret = cio_cancel_halt_clear(sch, &iretry);
-		};
-
+		private->completion = NULL;
+		flush_workqueue(vfio_ccw_work_q);
+		spin_lock_irq(sch->lock);
 		ret = cio_disable_subchannel(sch);
 	} while (ret == -EBUSY);
 out_unlock:
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-08 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-08 21:05 [RFC v2 0/3] fio-ccw fixes for kernel stacktraces Farhan Ali
2019-04-08 21:05 ` [RFC v2 1/3] vfio-ccw: Do not call flush_workqueue while holding the spinlock Farhan Ali
2019-04-08 21:05 ` Farhan Ali [this message]
2019-04-11 16:24   ` [RFC v2 2/3] vfio-ccw: Prevent quiesce function going into an infinite loop Cornelia Huck
2019-04-11 20:30     ` Farhan Ali
2019-04-12  8:10       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-12 14:38         ` Farhan Ali
2019-04-15  8:13           ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-15 13:38             ` Farhan Ali
2019-04-15 14:18               ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-15 14:24                 ` Farhan Ali
2019-04-15 14:44                   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-08 21:05 ` [RFC v2 3/3] vfio-ccw: Release any channel program when releasing/removing vfio-ccw mdev Farhan Ali
2019-04-11 16:27   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-11 20:39     ` Farhan Ali
2019-04-12  8:12       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-12 14:13         ` Farhan Ali
2019-04-12 21:03           ` Eric Farman
2019-04-12 21:01   ` Eric Farman
2019-04-15 16:45 ` [RFC v2 0/3] fio-ccw fixes for kernel stacktraces Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2c17cf29fbce8fc1cfbf60cfd04559d00c8eeac0.1554756534.git.alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.