All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, haibo1.xu@intel.com,
	ajones@ventanamicro.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
	Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
	Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Move reject_set check logic to a function
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 18:40:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <341feff384c9f8a20ed4aac6e2dda0440d6b84f2.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>

No functional changes. Just move the reject_set check logic to a
function so we can check for specific errno for specific register.
This is a preparation for support reject_set in riscv.

Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 8 ++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c         | 7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
index aaf035c969ec..4e2e1fe833eb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
@@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg)
 	return false;
 }
 
+bool reject_set_fail(__u64 reg)
+{
+	if (reg == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS)
+		return (errno != EPERM);
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 #define REG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK)
 
 #define CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS	2
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
index f6ad7991a812..b956ee410996 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
@@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
 	printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id);
 }
 
+bool __weak reject_set_fail(__u64 reg)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #ifdef __aarch64__
 static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
 {
@@ -216,7 +221,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
 			if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) {
 				reject_reg = true;
 				ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, &reg);
-				if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) {
+				if (ret != -1 || reject_set_fail(reg.id)) {
 					printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno);
 					print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id);
 					putchar('\n');
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, haibo1.xu@intel.com,
	ajones@ventanamicro.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
	Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
	Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Move reject_set check logic to a function
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 18:40:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <341feff384c9f8a20ed4aac6e2dda0440d6b84f2.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>

No functional changes. Just move the reject_set check logic to a
function so we can check for specific errno for specific register.
This is a preparation for support reject_set in riscv.

Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 8 ++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c         | 7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
index aaf035c969ec..4e2e1fe833eb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
@@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg)
 	return false;
 }
 
+bool reject_set_fail(__u64 reg)
+{
+	if (reg == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS)
+		return (errno != EPERM);
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 #define REG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK)
 
 #define CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS	2
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
index f6ad7991a812..b956ee410996 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
@@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
 	printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id);
 }
 
+bool __weak reject_set_fail(__u64 reg)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #ifdef __aarch64__
 static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
 {
@@ -216,7 +221,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
 			if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) {
 				reject_reg = true;
 				ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, &reg);
-				if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) {
+				if (ret != -1 || reject_set_fail(reg.id)) {
 					printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno);
 					print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id);
 					putchar('\n');
-- 
2.34.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, haibo1.xu@intel.com,
	ajones@ventanamicro.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
	Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
	Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Move reject_set check logic to a function
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 18:40:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <341feff384c9f8a20ed4aac6e2dda0440d6b84f2.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>

No functional changes. Just move the reject_set check logic to a
function so we can check for specific errno for specific register.
This is a preparation for support reject_set in riscv.

Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 8 ++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c         | 7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
index aaf035c969ec..4e2e1fe833eb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
@@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg)
 	return false;
 }
 
+bool reject_set_fail(__u64 reg)
+{
+	if (reg == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS)
+		return (errno != EPERM);
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 #define REG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK)
 
 #define CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS	2
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
index f6ad7991a812..b956ee410996 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
@@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
 	printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id);
 }
 
+bool __weak reject_set_fail(__u64 reg)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #ifdef __aarch64__
 static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
 {
@@ -216,7 +221,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
 			if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) {
 				reject_reg = true;
 				ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, &reg);
-				if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) {
+				if (ret != -1 || reject_set_fail(reg.id)) {
 					printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno);
 					print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id);
 					putchar('\n');
-- 
2.34.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, haibo1.xu@intel.com,
	ajones@ventanamicro.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
	Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
	Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Move reject_set check logic to a function
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 18:40:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <341feff384c9f8a20ed4aac6e2dda0440d6b84f2.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>

No functional changes. Just move the reject_set check logic to a
function so we can check for specific errno for specific register.
This is a preparation for support reject_set in riscv.

Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 8 ++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c         | 7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
index aaf035c969ec..4e2e1fe833eb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
@@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg)
 	return false;
 }
 
+bool reject_set_fail(__u64 reg)
+{
+	if (reg == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS)
+		return (errno != EPERM);
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 #define REG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK)
 
 #define CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS	2
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
index f6ad7991a812..b956ee410996 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
@@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
 	printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id);
 }
 
+bool __weak reject_set_fail(__u64 reg)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #ifdef __aarch64__
 static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
 {
@@ -216,7 +221,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
 			if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) {
 				reject_reg = true;
 				ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, &reg);
-				if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) {
+				if (ret != -1 || reject_set_fail(reg.id)) {
 					printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno);
 					print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id);
 					putchar('\n');
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-23 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-23 10:40 [PATCH v4 00/12] RISCV: Add KVM_GET_REG_LIST API Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Replace str_with_index with strdup_printf Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Drop SVE cap check in print_reg Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove print_reg's dependency on vcpu_config Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Rename vcpu_config and add to kvm_util.h Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Delete core_reg_fixup Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Split get-reg-list test code Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Finish generalizing get-reg-list Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu [this message]
2023-06-23 10:40   ` [PATCH v4 08/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Move reject_set check logic to a function Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-27  9:09   ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27  9:09     ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27  9:09     ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-28  5:58     ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28  5:58       ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28  5:58       ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] KVM: selftests: Only do get/set tests on present blessed list Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-27  9:11   ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27  9:11     ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27  9:11     ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-28  6:00     ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28  6:00       ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28  6:00       ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: riscv: Add KVM_GET_REG_LIST API support Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add finalize_vcpu check in run_test Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-27  9:16   ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27  9:16     ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27  9:16     ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-28 10:29     ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 10:29       ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 10:29       ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add get-reg-list test Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40   ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-27  9:25   ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27  9:25     ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27  9:25     ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-28 10:28     ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 10:28       ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 10:28       ` Haibo Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=341feff384c9f8a20ed4aac6e2dda0440d6b84f2.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com \
    --to=haibo1.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=vipinsh@google.com \
    --cc=xiaobo55x@gmail.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.