All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	jakub@redhat.com, segher@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/bitops: Fix possible undefined behaviour with fls() and fls64()
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:05:46 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <348c2d3f19ffcff8abe50d52513f989c4581d000.1603375524.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> (raw)

fls() and fls64() are using __builtin_ctz() and _builtin_ctzll().
On powerpc, those builtins trivially use ctlzw and ctlzd power
instructions.

Allthough those instructions provide the expected result with
input argument 0, __builtin_ctz() and __builtin_ctzll() are
documented as undefined for value 0.

The easiest fix would be to use fls() and fls64() functions
defined in include/asm-generic/bitops/builtin-fls.h and
include/asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h, but GCC output is not optimal:

00000388 <testfls>:
 388:   2c 03 00 00     cmpwi   r3,0
 38c:   41 82 00 10     beq     39c <testfls+0x14>
 390:   7c 63 00 34     cntlzw  r3,r3
 394:   20 63 00 20     subfic  r3,r3,32
 398:   4e 80 00 20     blr
 39c:   38 60 00 00     li      r3,0
 3a0:   4e 80 00 20     blr

000003b0 <testfls64>:
 3b0:   2c 03 00 00     cmpwi   r3,0
 3b4:   40 82 00 1c     bne     3d0 <testfls64+0x20>
 3b8:   2f 84 00 00     cmpwi   cr7,r4,0
 3bc:   38 60 00 00     li      r3,0
 3c0:   4d 9e 00 20     beqlr   cr7
 3c4:   7c 83 00 34     cntlzw  r3,r4
 3c8:   20 63 00 20     subfic  r3,r3,32
 3cc:   4e 80 00 20     blr
 3d0:   7c 63 00 34     cntlzw  r3,r3
 3d4:   20 63 00 40     subfic  r3,r3,64
 3d8:   4e 80 00 20     blr

When the input of fls(x) is a constant, just check x for nullity and
return either 0 or __builtin_clz(x). Otherwise, use cntlzw instruction
directly.

For fls64() on PPC64, do the same but with __builtin_clzll() and
cntlzd instruction. On PPC32, lets take the generic fls64() which
will use our fls(). The result is as expected:

00000388 <testfls>:
 388:   7c 63 00 34     cntlzw  r3,r3
 38c:   20 63 00 20     subfic  r3,r3,32
 390:   4e 80 00 20     blr

000003a0 <testfls64>:
 3a0:   2c 03 00 00     cmpwi   r3,0
 3a4:   40 82 00 10     bne     3b4 <testfls64+0x14>
 3a8:   7c 83 00 34     cntlzw  r3,r4
 3ac:   20 63 00 20     subfic  r3,r3,32
 3b0:   4e 80 00 20     blr
 3b4:   7c 63 00 34     cntlzw  r3,r3
 3b8:   20 63 00 40     subfic  r3,r3,64
 3bc:   4e 80 00 20     blr

Fixes: 2fcff790dcb4 ("powerpc: Use builtin functions for fls()/__fls()/fls64()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h
index 4a4d3afd5340..299ab33505a6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -216,15 +216,34 @@ static inline void arch___clear_bit_unlock(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
  */
 static inline int fls(unsigned int x)
 {
-	return 32 - __builtin_clz(x);
+	int lz;
+
+	if (__builtin_constant_p(x))
+		return x ? 32 - __builtin_clz(x) : 0;
+	asm("cntlzw %0,%1" : "=r" (lz) : "r" (x));
+	return 32 - lz;
 }
 
 #include <asm-generic/bitops/builtin-__fls.h>
 
+/*
+ * 64-bit can do this using one cntlzd (count leading zeroes doubleword)
+ * instruction; for 32-bit we use the generic version, which does two
+ * 32-bit fls calls.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 static inline int fls64(__u64 x)
 {
-	return 64 - __builtin_clzll(x);
+	int lz;
+
+	if (__builtin_constant_p(x))
+		return x ? 64 - __builtin_clzll(x) : 0;
+	asm("cntlzd %0,%1" : "=r" (lz) : "r" (x));
+	return 64 - lz;
 }
+#else
+#include <asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h>
+#endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 unsigned int __arch_hweight8(unsigned int w);
-- 
2.25.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	 jakub@redhat.com, segher@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/bitops: Fix possible undefined behaviour with fls() and fls64()
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:05:46 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <348c2d3f19ffcff8abe50d52513f989c4581d000.1603375524.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> (raw)

fls() and fls64() are using __builtin_ctz() and _builtin_ctzll().
On powerpc, those builtins trivially use ctlzw and ctlzd power
instructions.

Allthough those instructions provide the expected result with
input argument 0, __builtin_ctz() and __builtin_ctzll() are
documented as undefined for value 0.

The easiest fix would be to use fls() and fls64() functions
defined in include/asm-generic/bitops/builtin-fls.h and
include/asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h, but GCC output is not optimal:

00000388 <testfls>:
 388:   2c 03 00 00     cmpwi   r3,0
 38c:   41 82 00 10     beq     39c <testfls+0x14>
 390:   7c 63 00 34     cntlzw  r3,r3
 394:   20 63 00 20     subfic  r3,r3,32
 398:   4e 80 00 20     blr
 39c:   38 60 00 00     li      r3,0
 3a0:   4e 80 00 20     blr

000003b0 <testfls64>:
 3b0:   2c 03 00 00     cmpwi   r3,0
 3b4:   40 82 00 1c     bne     3d0 <testfls64+0x20>
 3b8:   2f 84 00 00     cmpwi   cr7,r4,0
 3bc:   38 60 00 00     li      r3,0
 3c0:   4d 9e 00 20     beqlr   cr7
 3c4:   7c 83 00 34     cntlzw  r3,r4
 3c8:   20 63 00 20     subfic  r3,r3,32
 3cc:   4e 80 00 20     blr
 3d0:   7c 63 00 34     cntlzw  r3,r3
 3d4:   20 63 00 40     subfic  r3,r3,64
 3d8:   4e 80 00 20     blr

When the input of fls(x) is a constant, just check x for nullity and
return either 0 or __builtin_clz(x). Otherwise, use cntlzw instruction
directly.

For fls64() on PPC64, do the same but with __builtin_clzll() and
cntlzd instruction. On PPC32, lets take the generic fls64() which
will use our fls(). The result is as expected:

00000388 <testfls>:
 388:   7c 63 00 34     cntlzw  r3,r3
 38c:   20 63 00 20     subfic  r3,r3,32
 390:   4e 80 00 20     blr

000003a0 <testfls64>:
 3a0:   2c 03 00 00     cmpwi   r3,0
 3a4:   40 82 00 10     bne     3b4 <testfls64+0x14>
 3a8:   7c 83 00 34     cntlzw  r3,r4
 3ac:   20 63 00 20     subfic  r3,r3,32
 3b0:   4e 80 00 20     blr
 3b4:   7c 63 00 34     cntlzw  r3,r3
 3b8:   20 63 00 40     subfic  r3,r3,64
 3bc:   4e 80 00 20     blr

Fixes: 2fcff790dcb4 ("powerpc: Use builtin functions for fls()/__fls()/fls64()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h
index 4a4d3afd5340..299ab33505a6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -216,15 +216,34 @@ static inline void arch___clear_bit_unlock(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
  */
 static inline int fls(unsigned int x)
 {
-	return 32 - __builtin_clz(x);
+	int lz;
+
+	if (__builtin_constant_p(x))
+		return x ? 32 - __builtin_clz(x) : 0;
+	asm("cntlzw %0,%1" : "=r" (lz) : "r" (x));
+	return 32 - lz;
 }
 
 #include <asm-generic/bitops/builtin-__fls.h>
 
+/*
+ * 64-bit can do this using one cntlzd (count leading zeroes doubleword)
+ * instruction; for 32-bit we use the generic version, which does two
+ * 32-bit fls calls.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 static inline int fls64(__u64 x)
 {
-	return 64 - __builtin_clzll(x);
+	int lz;
+
+	if (__builtin_constant_p(x))
+		return x ? 64 - __builtin_clzll(x) : 0;
+	asm("cntlzd %0,%1" : "=r" (lz) : "r" (x));
+	return 64 - lz;
 }
+#else
+#include <asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h>
+#endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 unsigned int __arch_hweight8(unsigned int w);
-- 
2.25.0


             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-22 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-22 14:05 Christophe Leroy [this message]
2020-10-22 14:05 ` [PATCH] powerpc/bitops: Fix possible undefined behaviour with fls() and fls64() Christophe Leroy
2020-10-22 16:37 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-10-22 16:37   ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-11-25 11:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-11-25 11:57   ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=348c2d3f19ffcff8abe50d52513f989c4581d000.1603375524.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.