All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>, "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/HVM: restrict use of pinned cache attributes as well as associated flushing
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 07:50:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42d40da1-bc38-82fb-154a-e1fc876b0c24@suse.com> (raw)

We don't permit use of uncachable memory types elsewhere unless a domain
meets certain criteria. Enforce this also during registration of pinned
cache attribute ranges.

Furthermore restrict cache flushing to just uncachable range registration.
While there, also
- take CPU self-snoop as well as IOMMU snoop into account (albeit the
  latter still is a global property rather than a per-domain one),
- avoid flushes when the domain isn't running yet (which ought to be the
  common case).

Reported-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
---
At the expense of yet larger a diff it would be possible to get away
without any "goto", by moving the whole "new entry" handling into the
switch(). Personally I'd prefer that, but the larger diff may be
unwelcome.

I have to admit that I can't spot what part of epte_get_entry_emt() the
comment refers to that is being deleted. The function does use
hvm_get_mem_pinned_cacheattr(), yes, but there's nothing there that talks
about cache flushes (and their avoiding) in any way.

Is it really sensible to add/remove ranges once the guest is already
running? (If it is, limiting the scope of the flush would be nice, but
would require knowing dirtyness for the domain wrt the caches, which
currently we don't track.)

This is kind of amending XSA-428.

--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/mtrr.c
@@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ int hvm_set_mem_pinned_cacheattr(struct
 {
     struct hvm_mem_pinned_cacheattr_range *range, *newr;
     unsigned int nr = 0;
+    bool flush = false;
     int rc = 1;
 
     if ( !is_hvm_domain(d) )
@@ -612,31 +613,35 @@ int hvm_set_mem_pinned_cacheattr(struct
 
                 type = range->type;
                 call_rcu(&range->rcu, free_pinned_cacheattr_entry);
-                p2m_memory_type_changed(d);
                 switch ( type )
                 {
-                case X86_MT_UCM:
+                case X86_MT_WB:
+                case X86_MT_WP:
+                case X86_MT_WT:
                     /*
-                     * For EPT we can also avoid the flush in this case;
-                     * see epte_get_entry_emt().
+                     * Flush since we don't know what the cachability is going
+                     * to be.
                      */
-                    if ( hap_enabled(d) && cpu_has_vmx )
-                case X86_MT_UC:
-                        break;
-                    /* fall through */
-                default:
-                    flush_all(FLUSH_CACHE);
+                    if ( is_iommu_enabled(d) || cache_flush_permitted(d) )
+                        flush = true;
                     break;
                 }
-                return 0;
+                rc = 0;
+                goto finish;
             }
         domain_unlock(d);
         return -ENOENT;
 
     case X86_MT_UCM:
     case X86_MT_UC:
-    case X86_MT_WB:
     case X86_MT_WC:
+        /* Flush since we don't know what the cachability was. */
+        if ( !is_iommu_enabled(d) && !cache_flush_permitted(d) )
+            return -EPERM;
+        flush = true;
+        break;
+
+    case X86_MT_WB:
     case X86_MT_WP:
     case X86_MT_WT:
         break;
@@ -689,8 +694,12 @@ int hvm_set_mem_pinned_cacheattr(struct
 
     xfree(newr);
 
+ finish:
     p2m_memory_type_changed(d);
-    if ( type != X86_MT_WB )
+
+    if ( flush && d->creation_finished &&
+         (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XEN_SELFSNOOP) ||
+          (is_iommu_enabled(d) && !iommu_snoop)) )
         flush_all(FLUSH_CACHE);
 
     return rc;


                 reply	other threads:[~2023-03-22  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42d40da1-bc38-82fb-154a-e1fc876b0c24@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.