All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: liubo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>, David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: make inode ref log recovery faster
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:09:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D64B2B2.3020703@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D64661F.1050801@cn.fujitsu.com>


When we recover from crash via write-ahead log tree and process
the inode refs, for each btrfs_inode_ref item, we will
1) check if we already have a perfect match in fs/file tree, if
   we have, then we're done.
2) search the corresponding back reference in fs/file tree, and
   check all the names in this back reference to see if they are
   also in the log to avoid conflict corners.
3) recover the logged inode refs to fs/file tree.

In current btrfs, however,
- for 2)'s check, once is enough, since the checked back reference
  will remain unchanged after processing all the inode refs belonged
  to the key.
- it has no need to do another 1) between 2) and 3).

I've made a small test to show how it improves,

$dd if=/dev/zero of=foobar bs=4K count=1
$sync
$make 100 hard links continuously, like ln foobar link_i
$fsync foobar
$echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger
after reboot
$time mount DEV PATH

without patch:
real    0m0.285s
user    0m0.001s
sys     0m0.009s

with patch:
real    0m0.123s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.010s

Changelog v1->v2:
- fix double free - pointed by David Sterba

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c |   37 +++++++++++++------------------------
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
index a4bbb85..bbdc63e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -799,12 +799,12 @@ static noinline int add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	struct inode *dir;
 	int ret;
 	struct btrfs_inode_ref *ref;
-	struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
 	struct inode *inode;
 	char *name;
 	int namelen;
 	unsigned long ref_ptr;
 	unsigned long ref_end;
+	int search_done = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * it is possible that we didn't log all the parent directories
@@ -845,7 +845,10 @@ again:
 	 * existing back reference, and we don't want to create
 	 * dangling pointers in the directory.
 	 */
-conflict_again:
+
+	if (search_done)
+		goto insert;
+
 	ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, key, path, 0, 0);
 	if (ret == 0) {
 		char *victim_name;
@@ -887,36 +890,22 @@ conflict_again:
 							 inode, victim_name,
 							 victim_name_len);
 				kfree(victim_name);
-				btrfs_release_path(root, path);
-				goto conflict_again;
 			}
-			kfree(victim_name);
+			if (victim_name)
+				kfree(victim_name);
 			ptr = (unsigned long)(victim_ref + 1) + victim_name_len;
 		}
 		BUG_ON(ret);
-	}
-	btrfs_release_path(root, path);
 
-	/* look for a conflicting sequence number */
-	di = btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item(trans, root, path, dir->i_ino,
-					 btrfs_inode_ref_index(eb, ref),
-					 name, namelen, 0);
-	if (di && !IS_ERR(di)) {
-		ret = drop_one_dir_item(trans, root, path, dir, di);
-		BUG_ON(ret);
-	}
-	btrfs_release_path(root, path);
-
-
-	/* look for a conflicting name */
-	di = btrfs_lookup_dir_item(trans, root, path, dir->i_ino,
-				   name, namelen, 0);
-	if (di && !IS_ERR(di)) {
-		ret = drop_one_dir_item(trans, root, path, dir, di);
-		BUG_ON(ret);
+		/*
+		 * NOTE: we have searched root tree and checked the
+		 * coresponding ref, it does not need to check again.
+		 */
+		search_done = 1;
 	}
 	btrfs_release_path(root, path);
 
+insert:
 	/* insert our name */
 	ret = btrfs_add_link(trans, dir, inode, name, namelen, 0,
 			     btrfs_inode_ref_index(eb, ref));
-- 
1.6.5.2


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-23  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-22 11:42 [PATCH] btrfs: make inode ref log recovery faster liubo
2011-02-22 14:32 ` David Sterba
2011-02-23  1:12   ` liubo
2011-02-23  1:30     ` Josef Bacik
2011-02-23  1:42       ` liubo
2011-02-23  7:09         ` liubo [this message]
2011-02-23  7:20           ` [PATCH v2] " Li Zefan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D64B2B2.3020703@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=dave@jikos.cz \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.