All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: girishks2000@gmail.com
To: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, Girish K S <girishks2000@gmail.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v1 2/3] spi: s3c64xx: Added provision for dedicated cs pin
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:30:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51bfe973.4266420a.3737.352b@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371531611-29031-1-git-send-email-0000-cover-letter.patch>

From: Girish K S <girishks2000@gmail.com>

The existing driver supports gpio based /cs signal.
For controller's that have one device per controller,
the slave device's /cs signal might be internally controlled
by the chip select bit of slave select register. They are not
externally asserted/deasserted using gpio pin.

This patch adds support for controllers with dedicated /cs pin.
if "cs-gpio" property doesnt exist in a spi dts node, the controller
would treat the /cs pin as dedicated.

Signed-off-by: Girish K S <ks.giri@samsung.com>
---
changes in v1:
		Added the missing data structure that caused the
compilation error

 drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
index 0a80692..eaf9e1c 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data {
 	struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config	*port_conf;
 	unsigned int			port_id;
 	unsigned long			gpios[4];
+	bool				cs_gpio;
 };
 
 static void flush_fifo(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd)
@@ -570,14 +571,16 @@ static inline void enable_cs(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
 		if (sdd->tgl_spi != spi) { /* if last mssg on diff device */
 			/* Deselect the last toggled device */
 			cs = sdd->tgl_spi->controller_data;
-			gpio_set_value(cs->line,
-				spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
+			if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+				gpio_set_value(cs->line,
+					spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
 		}
 		sdd->tgl_spi = NULL;
 	}
 
 	cs = spi->controller_data;
-	gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 1 : 0);
+	if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+		gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 1 : 0);
 
 	/* Start the signals */
 	writel(0, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
@@ -709,7 +712,8 @@ static inline void disable_cs(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
 	if (sdd->tgl_spi == spi)
 		sdd->tgl_spi = NULL;
 
-	gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
+	if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+		gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
 
 	/* Quiese the signals */
 	writel(S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SIG_INACT, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
@@ -997,8 +1001,10 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *s3c64xx_get_slave_ctrldata(
 {
 	struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *cs;
 	struct device_node *slave_np, *data_np = NULL;
+	struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd;
 	u32 fb_delay = 0;
 
+	sdd = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
 	slave_np = spi->dev.of_node;
 	if (!slave_np) {
 		dev_err(&spi->dev, "device node not found\n");
@@ -1018,7 +1024,10 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *s3c64xx_get_slave_ctrldata(
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
 
-	cs->line = of_get_named_gpio(data_np, "cs-gpio", 0);
+	/* The CS line is asserted/deasserted by the gpio pin */
+	if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+		cs->line = of_get_named_gpio(data_np, "cs-gpio", 0);
+
 	if (!gpio_is_valid(cs->line)) {
 		dev_err(&spi->dev, "chip select gpio is not specified or invalid\n");
 		kfree(cs);
@@ -1058,7 +1067,8 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	if (!spi_get_ctldata(spi)) {
+	/* Request gpio only if cs line is asserted by gpio pins */
+	if (sdd->cs_gpio) {
 		err = gpio_request_one(cs->line, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH,
 				       dev_name(&spi->dev));
 		if (err) {
@@ -1067,9 +1077,11 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
 				cs->line, err);
 			goto err_gpio_req;
 		}
-		spi_set_ctldata(spi, cs);
 	}
 
+	if (!spi_get_ctldata(spi))
+		spi_set_ctldata(spi, cs);
+
 	sci = sdd->cntrlr_info;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sdd->lock, flags);
@@ -1147,8 +1159,10 @@ err_gpio_req:
 static void s3c64xx_spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)
 {
 	struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *cs = spi_get_ctldata(spi);
+	struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd;
 
-	if (cs) {
+	sdd = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
+	if (cs && sdd->cs_gpio) {
 		gpio_free(cs->line);
 		if (spi->dev.of_node)
 			kfree(cs);
@@ -1325,7 +1339,11 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	sdd->cntrlr_info = sci;
 	sdd->pdev = pdev;
 	sdd->sfr_start = mem_res->start;
+	sdd->cs_gpio = false;
 	if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
+		if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpio", NULL))
+			sdd->cs_gpio = true;
+
 		ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "spi");
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get alias id, errno %d\n",
-- 
1.7.5.4


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: girishks2000-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
To: spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Cc: broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	Girish K S <girishks2000-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v1 2/3] spi: s3c64xx: Added provision for dedicated cs pin
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:30:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51bfe973.4266420a.3737.352b@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371531611-29031-1-git-send-email-0000-cover-letter.patch>

From: Girish K S <girishks2000-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

The existing driver supports gpio based /cs signal.
For controller's that have one device per controller,
the slave device's /cs signal might be internally controlled
by the chip select bit of slave select register. They are not
externally asserted/deasserted using gpio pin.

This patch adds support for controllers with dedicated /cs pin.
if "cs-gpio" property doesnt exist in a spi dts node, the controller
would treat the /cs pin as dedicated.

Signed-off-by: Girish K S <ks.giri-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
---
changes in v1:
		Added the missing data structure that caused the
compilation error

 drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
index 0a80692..eaf9e1c 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data {
 	struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config	*port_conf;
 	unsigned int			port_id;
 	unsigned long			gpios[4];
+	bool				cs_gpio;
 };
 
 static void flush_fifo(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd)
@@ -570,14 +571,16 @@ static inline void enable_cs(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
 		if (sdd->tgl_spi != spi) { /* if last mssg on diff device */
 			/* Deselect the last toggled device */
 			cs = sdd->tgl_spi->controller_data;
-			gpio_set_value(cs->line,
-				spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
+			if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+				gpio_set_value(cs->line,
+					spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
 		}
 		sdd->tgl_spi = NULL;
 	}
 
 	cs = spi->controller_data;
-	gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 1 : 0);
+	if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+		gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 1 : 0);
 
 	/* Start the signals */
 	writel(0, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
@@ -709,7 +712,8 @@ static inline void disable_cs(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
 	if (sdd->tgl_spi == spi)
 		sdd->tgl_spi = NULL;
 
-	gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
+	if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+		gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
 
 	/* Quiese the signals */
 	writel(S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SIG_INACT, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
@@ -997,8 +1001,10 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *s3c64xx_get_slave_ctrldata(
 {
 	struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *cs;
 	struct device_node *slave_np, *data_np = NULL;
+	struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd;
 	u32 fb_delay = 0;
 
+	sdd = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
 	slave_np = spi->dev.of_node;
 	if (!slave_np) {
 		dev_err(&spi->dev, "device node not found\n");
@@ -1018,7 +1024,10 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *s3c64xx_get_slave_ctrldata(
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
 
-	cs->line = of_get_named_gpio(data_np, "cs-gpio", 0);
+	/* The CS line is asserted/deasserted by the gpio pin */
+	if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+		cs->line = of_get_named_gpio(data_np, "cs-gpio", 0);
+
 	if (!gpio_is_valid(cs->line)) {
 		dev_err(&spi->dev, "chip select gpio is not specified or invalid\n");
 		kfree(cs);
@@ -1058,7 +1067,8 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	if (!spi_get_ctldata(spi)) {
+	/* Request gpio only if cs line is asserted by gpio pins */
+	if (sdd->cs_gpio) {
 		err = gpio_request_one(cs->line, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH,
 				       dev_name(&spi->dev));
 		if (err) {
@@ -1067,9 +1077,11 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
 				cs->line, err);
 			goto err_gpio_req;
 		}
-		spi_set_ctldata(spi, cs);
 	}
 
+	if (!spi_get_ctldata(spi))
+		spi_set_ctldata(spi, cs);
+
 	sci = sdd->cntrlr_info;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sdd->lock, flags);
@@ -1147,8 +1159,10 @@ err_gpio_req:
 static void s3c64xx_spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)
 {
 	struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *cs = spi_get_ctldata(spi);
+	struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd;
 
-	if (cs) {
+	sdd = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
+	if (cs && sdd->cs_gpio) {
 		gpio_free(cs->line);
 		if (spi->dev.of_node)
 			kfree(cs);
@@ -1325,7 +1339,11 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	sdd->cntrlr_info = sci;
 	sdd->pdev = pdev;
 	sdd->sfr_start = mem_res->start;
+	sdd->cs_gpio = false;
 	if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
+		if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpio", NULL))
+			sdd->cs_gpio = true;
+
 		ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "spi");
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get alias id, errno %d\n",
-- 
1.7.5.4


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: girishks2000@gmail.com (girishks2000 at gmail.com)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v1 2/3] spi: s3c64xx: Added provision for dedicated cs pin
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:30:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51bfe973.4266420a.3737.352b@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371531611-29031-1-git-send-email-0000-cover-letter.patch>

From: Girish K S <girishks2000@gmail.com>

The existing driver supports gpio based /cs signal.
For controller's that have one device per controller,
the slave device's /cs signal might be internally controlled
by the chip select bit of slave select register. They are not
externally asserted/deasserted using gpio pin.

This patch adds support for controllers with dedicated /cs pin.
if "cs-gpio" property doesnt exist in a spi dts node, the controller
would treat the /cs pin as dedicated.

Signed-off-by: Girish K S <ks.giri@samsung.com>
---
changes in v1:
		Added the missing data structure that caused the
compilation error

 drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
index 0a80692..eaf9e1c 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data {
 	struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config	*port_conf;
 	unsigned int			port_id;
 	unsigned long			gpios[4];
+	bool				cs_gpio;
 };
 
 static void flush_fifo(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd)
@@ -570,14 +571,16 @@ static inline void enable_cs(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
 		if (sdd->tgl_spi != spi) { /* if last mssg on diff device */
 			/* Deselect the last toggled device */
 			cs = sdd->tgl_spi->controller_data;
-			gpio_set_value(cs->line,
-				spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
+			if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+				gpio_set_value(cs->line,
+					spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
 		}
 		sdd->tgl_spi = NULL;
 	}
 
 	cs = spi->controller_data;
-	gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 1 : 0);
+	if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+		gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 1 : 0);
 
 	/* Start the signals */
 	writel(0, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
@@ -709,7 +712,8 @@ static inline void disable_cs(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
 	if (sdd->tgl_spi == spi)
 		sdd->tgl_spi = NULL;
 
-	gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
+	if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+		gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
 
 	/* Quiese the signals */
 	writel(S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SIG_INACT, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
@@ -997,8 +1001,10 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *s3c64xx_get_slave_ctrldata(
 {
 	struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *cs;
 	struct device_node *slave_np, *data_np = NULL;
+	struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd;
 	u32 fb_delay = 0;
 
+	sdd = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
 	slave_np = spi->dev.of_node;
 	if (!slave_np) {
 		dev_err(&spi->dev, "device node not found\n");
@@ -1018,7 +1024,10 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *s3c64xx_get_slave_ctrldata(
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
 
-	cs->line = of_get_named_gpio(data_np, "cs-gpio", 0);
+	/* The CS line is asserted/deasserted by the gpio pin */
+	if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+		cs->line = of_get_named_gpio(data_np, "cs-gpio", 0);
+
 	if (!gpio_is_valid(cs->line)) {
 		dev_err(&spi->dev, "chip select gpio is not specified or invalid\n");
 		kfree(cs);
@@ -1058,7 +1067,8 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	if (!spi_get_ctldata(spi)) {
+	/* Request gpio only if cs line is asserted by gpio pins */
+	if (sdd->cs_gpio) {
 		err = gpio_request_one(cs->line, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH,
 				       dev_name(&spi->dev));
 		if (err) {
@@ -1067,9 +1077,11 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
 				cs->line, err);
 			goto err_gpio_req;
 		}
-		spi_set_ctldata(spi, cs);
 	}
 
+	if (!spi_get_ctldata(spi))
+		spi_set_ctldata(spi, cs);
+
 	sci = sdd->cntrlr_info;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sdd->lock, flags);
@@ -1147,8 +1159,10 @@ err_gpio_req:
 static void s3c64xx_spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)
 {
 	struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *cs = spi_get_ctldata(spi);
+	struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd;
 
-	if (cs) {
+	sdd = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
+	if (cs && sdd->cs_gpio) {
 		gpio_free(cs->line);
 		if (spi->dev.of_node)
 			kfree(cs);
@@ -1325,7 +1339,11 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	sdd->cntrlr_info = sci;
 	sdd->pdev = pdev;
 	sdd->sfr_start = mem_res->start;
+	sdd->cs_gpio = false;
 	if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
+		if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpio", NULL))
+			sdd->cs_gpio = true;
+
 		ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "spi");
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get alias id, errno %d\n",
-- 
1.7.5.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-18  5:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1371531611-29031-1-git-send-email-0000-cover-letter.patch>
2013-06-18  5:00 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 1/3] spi: s3c64xx: added support for polling mode girishks2000
2013-06-18  5:00   ` girishks2000 at gmail.com
2013-06-18  5:00   ` girishks2000-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
2013-06-18  5:00 ` girishks2000 [this message]
2013-06-18  5:00   ` [RESEND PATCH v1 2/3] spi: s3c64xx: Added provision for dedicated cs pin girishks2000 at gmail.com
2013-06-18  5:00   ` girishks2000-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
2013-06-18  5:00 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 3/3] spi: s3c64xx: Added support for exynos5440 spi girishks2000
2013-06-18  5:00   ` girishks2000 at gmail.com
2013-06-18  5:00   ` girishks2000-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51bfe973.4266420a.3737.352b@mx.google.com \
    --to=girishks2000@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.