All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/MSI: handle both MSI-X and MSI in cfg space write intercept
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:45:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <571911AD02000078000E46C9@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1404 bytes --]

In commit aa7c1fdf9d ("x86/MSI: properly track guest masking requests")
I neglected to consider devices allowing for both MSI and MSI-X to be
used (not at the same time of course): The MSI-X part of the intercept
logic needs to fall through to the MSI one when the access is outside
the MSI-X capability bounds.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
@@ -1292,17 +1292,17 @@ int pci_msi_conf_write_intercept(struct
                                           PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
         ASSERT(pos);
 
-        if ( reg < pos || reg >= msix_pba_offset_reg(pos) + 4 )
-            return 0;
+        if ( reg >= pos && reg < msix_pba_offset_reg(pos) + 4 )
+        {
+            if ( reg != msix_control_reg(pos) || size != 2 )
+                return -EACCES;
 
-        if ( reg != msix_control_reg(pos) || size != 2 )
-            return -EACCES;
+            pdev->msix->guest_maskall = !!(*data & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL);
+            if ( pdev->msix->host_maskall )
+                *data |= PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL;
 
-        pdev->msix->guest_maskall = !!(*data & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL);
-        if ( pdev->msix->host_maskall )
-            *data |= PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL;
-
-        return 1;
+            return 1;
+        }
     }
 
     entry = find_msi_entry(pdev, -1, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);




[-- Attachment #2: x86-MSI-intercept-both.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1465 bytes --]

x86/MSI: handle both MSI-X and MSI in cfg space write intercept

In commit aa7c1fdf9d ("x86/MSI: properly track guest masking requests")
I neglected to consider devices allowing for both MSI and MSI-X to be
used (not at the same time of course): The MSI-X part of the intercept
logic needs to fall through to the MSI one when the access is outside
the MSI-X capability bounds.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
@@ -1292,17 +1292,17 @@ int pci_msi_conf_write_intercept(struct
                                           PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
         ASSERT(pos);
 
-        if ( reg < pos || reg >= msix_pba_offset_reg(pos) + 4 )
-            return 0;
+        if ( reg >= pos && reg < msix_pba_offset_reg(pos) + 4 )
+        {
+            if ( reg != msix_control_reg(pos) || size != 2 )
+                return -EACCES;
 
-        if ( reg != msix_control_reg(pos) || size != 2 )
-            return -EACCES;
+            pdev->msix->guest_maskall = !!(*data & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL);
+            if ( pdev->msix->host_maskall )
+                *data |= PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL;
 
-        pdev->msix->guest_maskall = !!(*data & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL);
-        if ( pdev->msix->host_maskall )
-            *data |= PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL;
-
-        return 1;
+            return 1;
+        }
     }
 
     entry = find_msi_entry(pdev, -1, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-21 15:45 Jan Beulich [this message]
2016-04-22 17:20 ` [PATCH] x86/MSI: handle both MSI-X and MSI in cfg space write intercept Andrew Cooper
2016-04-25 11:29 ` Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=571911AD02000078000E46C9@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.