From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] x86/cpuidle: really use C1 for "urgent" CPUs Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 06:17:41 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5CE68F650200007800231B38@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5CE68CD30200007800231B01@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> For one on recent AMD CPUs entering C1 (if available at all) requires use of MWAIT, while HLT (i.e. default_idle()) would put the processor into as deep as CC6. And then even on other vendors' CPUs we should avoid entering default_idle() when the intended state can be reached by using the active idle driver's facilities. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c @@ -580,12 +580,15 @@ static void acpi_processor_idle(void) u32 exp = 0, pred = 0; u32 irq_traced[4] = { 0 }; - if ( max_cstate > 0 && power && !sched_has_urgent_vcpu() && + if ( max_cstate > 0 && power && (next_state = cpuidle_current_governor->select(power)) > 0 ) { + unsigned int max_state = sched_has_urgent_vcpu() ? ACPI_STATE_C1 + : max_cstate; + do { cx = &power->states[next_state]; - } while ( cx->type > max_cstate && --next_state ); + } while ( cx->type > max_state && --next_state ); if ( next_state ) { if ( cx->type == ACPI_STATE_C3 && power->flags.bm_check && --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mwait-idle.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mwait-idle.c @@ -724,11 +724,14 @@ static void mwait_idle(void) u64 before, after; u32 exp = 0, pred = 0, irq_traced[4] = { 0 }; - if (max_cstate > 0 && power && !sched_has_urgent_vcpu() && + if (max_cstate > 0 && power && (next_state = cpuidle_current_governor->select(power)) > 0) { + unsigned int max_state = sched_has_urgent_vcpu() ? ACPI_STATE_C1 + : max_cstate; + do { cx = &power->states[next_state]; - } while (cx->type > max_cstate && --next_state); + } while (cx->type > max_state && --next_state); if (!next_state) cx = NULL; else if (tb_init_done) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> To: "xen-devel" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] x86/cpuidle: really use C1 for "urgent" CPUs Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 06:17:41 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5CE68F650200007800231B38@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20190523121741.xzcRX3fxUIHTGASfVuyMsWROiNX4PHqDDLSKqdC3Ck0@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5CE68CD30200007800231B01@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> For one on recent AMD CPUs entering C1 (if available at all) requires use of MWAIT, while HLT (i.e. default_idle()) would put the processor into as deep as CC6. And then even on other vendors' CPUs we should avoid entering default_idle() when the intended state can be reached by using the active idle driver's facilities. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c @@ -580,12 +580,15 @@ static void acpi_processor_idle(void) u32 exp = 0, pred = 0; u32 irq_traced[4] = { 0 }; - if ( max_cstate > 0 && power && !sched_has_urgent_vcpu() && + if ( max_cstate > 0 && power && (next_state = cpuidle_current_governor->select(power)) > 0 ) { + unsigned int max_state = sched_has_urgent_vcpu() ? ACPI_STATE_C1 + : max_cstate; + do { cx = &power->states[next_state]; - } while ( cx->type > max_cstate && --next_state ); + } while ( cx->type > max_state && --next_state ); if ( next_state ) { if ( cx->type == ACPI_STATE_C3 && power->flags.bm_check && --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mwait-idle.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mwait-idle.c @@ -724,11 +724,14 @@ static void mwait_idle(void) u64 before, after; u32 exp = 0, pred = 0, irq_traced[4] = { 0 }; - if (max_cstate > 0 && power && !sched_has_urgent_vcpu() && + if (max_cstate > 0 && power && (next_state = cpuidle_current_governor->select(power)) > 0) { + unsigned int max_state = sched_has_urgent_vcpu() ? ACPI_STATE_C1 + : max_cstate; + do { cx = &power->states[next_state]; - } while (cx->type > max_cstate && --next_state); + } while (cx->type > max_state && --next_state); if (!next_state) cx = NULL; else if (tb_init_done) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-23 12:17 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-05-23 12:06 [PATCH 0/5] x86: CPU idle management adjustments Jan Beulich 2019-05-23 12:06 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-23 12:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/cpuidle: switch to uniform meaning of "max_cstate=" Jan Beulich 2019-05-23 12:16 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-06-10 15:48 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-06-11 12:13 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-23 12:17 ` Jan Beulich [this message] 2019-05-23 12:17 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] x86/cpuidle: really use C1 for "urgent" CPUs Jan Beulich 2019-06-10 15:50 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-05-23 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/AMD: make C-state handling independent of Dom0 Jan Beulich 2019-05-23 12:18 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-06-10 16:28 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-06-11 12:42 ` Jan Beulich 2019-06-18 17:22 ` Woods, Brian 2019-06-19 6:20 ` Jan Beulich 2019-06-19 15:54 ` Woods, Brian 2019-06-21 6:37 ` Jan Beulich 2019-06-21 14:29 ` Woods, Brian 2019-06-21 14:56 ` Jan Beulich 2019-06-21 15:26 ` Woods, Brian 2019-05-23 12:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: allow limiting the max C-state sub-state Jan Beulich 2019-05-23 12:18 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-06-10 16:43 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-06-11 12:46 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-23 12:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] tools/libxc: allow controlling " Jan Beulich 2019-05-23 12:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-24 14:00 ` Wei Liu 2019-05-24 14:00 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu 2019-06-10 16:54 ` Andrew Cooper 2019-06-11 12:50 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=5CE68F650200007800231B38@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com \ --to=jbeulich@suse.com \ --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \ --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \ --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \ --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.