All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
	Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Subject: [PATCH v3 16/22] btrfs: Add new FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ENCRYPT feature flag.
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 12:58:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <68dba5d948573f1fee9255c64642daa2d1f8dec1.1666281277.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1666281276.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>

From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>

As encrypted files will be incompatible with older filesystem versions,
new filesystems should be created with an incompat flag for fscrypt,
which will gate access to the encryption ioctls.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h           | 5 +++--
 fs/btrfs/super.c           | 5 +++++
 include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 1 +
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index f09a7872b296..32296dedeb95 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static_assert(sizeof(struct btrfs_super_block) == BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
 /*
- * Extent tree v2 supported only with CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
+ * Extent tree v2 and encryption supported only with CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
  */
 #define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP			\
 	(BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_BACKREF |		\
@@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ static_assert(sizeof(struct btrfs_super_block) == BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE);
 	 BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_METADATA_UUID	|	\
 	 BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RAID1C34	|	\
 	 BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ZONED		|	\
-	 BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENT_TREE_V2)
+	 BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENT_TREE_V2	|	\
+	 BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ENCRYPT)
 #else
 #define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP			\
 	(BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_BACKREF |		\
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 20123d3634a6..2eaaaf01b842 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -2705,6 +2705,11 @@ static void __init btrfs_print_mod_info(void)
 			", fsverity=yes"
 #else
 			", fsverity=no"
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
+			", fscrypt=yes"
+#else
+			", fscrypt=no"
 #endif
 			;
 	pr_info("Btrfs loaded, crc32c=%s%s\n", crc32c_impl(), options);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
index 5655e89b962b..1d29f0df995b 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
@@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args {
 #define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RAID1C34		(1ULL << 11)
 #define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ZONED		(1ULL << 12)
 #define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENT_TREE_V2	(1ULL << 13)
+#define BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ENCRYPT		(1ULL << 14)
 
 struct btrfs_ioctl_feature_flags {
 	__u64 compat_flags;
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-20 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-20 16:58 [PATCH v3 00/22] btrfs: add fscrypt integration Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/22] fscrypt: expose fscrypt_nokey_name Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 02/22] fscrypt: add fscrypt_have_same_policy() to check inode compatibility Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 20:52   ` Josef Bacik
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 03/22] fscrypt: allow fscrypt_generate_iv() to distinguish filenames Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 04/22] fscrypt: add extent-based encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 21:40   ` Eric Biggers
2022-10-20 22:20     ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 21:45   ` Eric Biggers
2022-10-20 22:55     ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 23:56       ` Eric Biggers
2022-10-21  0:37         ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 05/22] fscrypt: document btrfs' fscrypt quirks Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 21:41   ` Eric Biggers
2022-10-20 22:07     ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 06/22] btrfs: use struct qstr instead of name and namelen Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 07/22] btrfs: setup qstrings from dentrys using fscrypt helper Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 08/22] btrfs: use struct fscrypt_str instead of struct qstr Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-21 20:42   ` Josef Bacik
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 09/22] btrfs: store directory encryption state Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 10/22] btrfs: disable various operations on encrypted inodes Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 11/22] btrfs: start using fscrypt hooks Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 12/22] btrfs: add fscrypt_context items Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-21 20:54   ` Josef Bacik
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 13/22] btrfs: translate btrfs encryption flags and encrypted inode flag Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 14/22] btrfs: store a fscrypt extent context per normal file extent Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 15/22] btrfs: encrypt normal file extent data if appropriate Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-21 20:58   ` Josef Bacik
2022-10-20 16:58 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy [this message]
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 17/22] btrfs: implement fscrypt ioctls Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 18/22] btrfs: permit searching for nokey names for removal Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 19/22] btrfs: use correct name hash for nokey names Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 20/22] btrfs: adapt lookup for partially encrypted directories Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 21/22] fscrypt: add flag allowing partially-encrypted directories Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 22/22] btrfs: encrypt verity items Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 00/22] btrfs: add fscrypt integration Eric Biggers
2022-10-20 23:12   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=68dba5d948573f1fee9255c64642daa2d1f8dec1.1666281277.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
    --to=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.