All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fdmanana@kernel.org
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] generic: test fsync after punching hole adjacent to an existing hole
Date: Mon,  8 Aug 2022 12:18:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83a74ba89e9e4ee1060b7dfa1f190d4b51691909.1659957268.git.fdmanana@suse.com> (raw)

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

Test that if we punch a hole adjacent to an existing hole, fsync the file
and then power fail, the new hole exists after mounting again the
filesystem.

This currently fails on btrfs with kernels 5.18 and 5.19 when not using
the "no-holes" feature. The "no-holes" feature is enabled by default at
mkfs time starting with btrfs-progs 5.15, so to trigger the issue with
btrfs-progs 5.15+ and kernel 5.18 or kernel 5.19, one must set
"-O ^no-holes" in the MKFS_OPTIONS environment variable (part of the
btrfs test matrix).

The issue is fixed for btrfs with the following kernel patch:

  "btrfs: update generation of hole file extent item when merging holes"

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
---
 tests/generic/694     | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/generic/694.out | 15 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tests/generic/694
 create mode 100644 tests/generic/694.out

diff --git a/tests/generic/694 b/tests/generic/694
new file mode 100755
index 00000000..c034f914
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/generic/694
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (C) 2022 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# FS QA Test 694
+#
+# Test that if we punch a hole adjacent to an existing hole, fsync the file and
+# then power fail, the new hole exists after mounting again the filesystem.
+#
+. ./common/preamble
+_begin_fstest quick log punch
+
+_cleanup()
+{
+	_cleanup_flakey
+	cd /
+	rm -r -f $tmp.*
+}
+
+# Import common functions.
+. ./common/filter
+. ./common/dmflakey
+. ./common/punch
+
+# real QA test starts here
+
+# Modify as appropriate.
+_supported_fs generic
+_require_scratch
+_require_dm_target flakey
+_require_xfs_io_command "fpunch"
+_require_xfs_io_command "fiemap"
+
+_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
+_require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV
+_init_flakey
+_mount_flakey
+
+# Create our test file with the following layout:
+#
+# [0, 2M)    - hole
+# [2M, 10M)  - extent
+# [10M, 12M) - hole
+$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 12M" \
+	     -c "pwrite -S 0xab 2M 8M" \
+	     $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar | _filter_xfs_io
+
+# Persist everything, commit the filesystem's transaction.
+sync
+
+# Now punch two holes in the file:
+#
+# 1) For the range [2M, 4M), which is adjacent to the existing hole in the range
+#    [0, 2M);
+# 2) For the range [8M, 10M), which is adjacent to the existing hole in the
+#    range [10M, 12M).
+#
+# These operations start a new filesystem transaction.
+# Then finally fsync the file.
+$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fpunch 2M 2M" \
+	     -c "fpunch 8M 2M" \
+	     -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
+
+# Simulate a power failure and mount the filesystem to check that everything
+# is in the same state as before the power failure.
+_flakey_drop_and_remount
+
+# We expect the following file layout:
+#
+# [0, 4M)    - hole
+# [4M, 8M)   - extent
+# [8M, 12M)  - hole
+echo "File layout after power failure:"
+$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar | _filter_fiemap
+
+# When reading the file we expect to get the range [4M, 8M) filled with bytes
+# that have a value of 0xab and 0x00 for anything outside that range.
+echo "File content after power failure:"
+od -A d -t x1 $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
+
+_unmount_flakey
+
+# success, all done
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/generic/694.out b/tests/generic/694.out
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f55212f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/generic/694.out
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+QA output created by 694
+wrote 8388608/8388608 bytes at offset 2097152
+XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
+File layout after power failure:
+0: [0..8191]: hole
+1: [8192..16383]: data
+2: [16384..24575]: hole
+File content after power failure:
+0000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
+*
+4194304 ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab
+*
+8388608 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
+*
+12582912
-- 
2.35.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-08-08 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-08 11:18 fdmanana [this message]
2022-08-09  3:35 ` [PATCH] generic: test fsync after punching hole adjacent to an existing hole Zorro Lang
2022-08-09  7:29   ` Filipe Manana
2022-08-09 15:13     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-08-11 17:05       ` Zorro Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83a74ba89e9e4ee1060b7dfa1f190d4b51691909.1659957268.git.fdmanana@suse.com \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.